UCC attachment filed separately - will this create problems with my UCC-1?
I'm dealing with a complex equipment financing situation and need some guidance. Filed a UCC-1 last month for a multi-million dollar industrial equipment deal, but the collateral description was getting too long for the standard form. My attorney suggested filing the detailed equipment list as a separate UCC attachment document. The main UCC-1 just says 'See attached Schedule A for complete collateral description' and references the attachment filing number. Everything was accepted by the SOS system, but now I'm second-guessing whether this approach actually perfects our security interest properly. Has anyone dealt with UCC attachment filings before? The debtor is asking questions about why there are two separate documents in the system, and I want to make sure we didn't create any gaps in our lien coverage. The equipment includes everything from CNC machines to conveyor systems, so the full description runs about 4 pages. Any insights on whether separate UCC attachments are as legally solid as including everything in the main filing?
33 comments
Join the conversation
Abby Marshall
UCC attachments are totally standard for complex collateral situations. You did the right thing - trying to cram 4 pages of equipment descriptions into the main form would have been a nightmare. As long as your UCC-1 clearly references the attachment and both documents are properly filed, you're covered.
0 coins
Sadie Benitez
•Agreed, but make sure the cross-reference is crystal clear. I've seen cases where vague references to attachments caused problems later during enforcement.
0 coins
Drew Hathaway
•What exactly did you put in the main collateral description? Just curious about the wording you used to reference the attachment.
0 coins
Laila Prince
I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and attachment filings are common practice, especially in equipment finance. The key is making sure the attachment document is properly incorporated by reference in your main UCC-1. Sounds like you handled it correctly.
0 coins
Isabel Vega
•Do you know if there are any state-specific rules about how the attachment reference needs to be worded? I'm always paranoid about getting the language wrong.
0 coins
Dominique Adams
•Most states follow the standard UCC article 9 rules for attachments. The reference just needs to be clear enough that someone searching the records can locate and identify the attachment.
0 coins
Marilyn Dixon
•This is making me nervous about a filing I did last week. I referenced an attachment but didn't include the specific filing number. Think that's a problem?
0 coins
Louisa Ramirez
You might want to double-check that both documents are properly linked in the system. I had a situation where the UCC-1 was accepted but the attachment got a different filing number than expected, which created confusion during a lien search.
0 coins
TommyKapitz
•This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document checker. You can upload both your UCC-1 and attachment PDFs and it verifies that all the cross-references match up correctly. Saved me from a similar headache.
0 coins
Angel Campbell
•That's a good point about the filing numbers. The SOS systems can be unpredictable about how they assign numbers to related documents.
0 coins
Payton Black
Your lender should be fine with the attachment approach. Most institutional lenders actually prefer detailed attachments for equipment deals because it makes the collateral easier to identify and value. The debtor's questions are probably just standard due diligence.
0 coins
Harold Oh
•Yeah, I think the debtor is just trying to understand why there are multiple documents. Better to over-document than under-document in these situations.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•Have you considered sending the debtor a brief explanation of why you used an attachment? Might help with their due diligence process.
0 coins
Summer Green
•The debtor probably just wants to make sure they understand all the documents that were filed against them. Totally reasonable question on their part.
0 coins
Gael Robinson
One thing to watch out for - make sure your continuation filing in 5 years includes both the main UCC-1 and the attachment. I've seen situations where people only continued the main filing and forgot about the attachment.
0 coins
Edward McBride
•Good catch! Do you need to file separate continuations for each document or can one continuation cover both?
0 coins
Darcy Moore
•Usually one continuation can cover both if it properly references the original filings. But check your state's specific requirements.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
I'm curious about the practical side - did you file both documents on the same day? Sometimes there can be timing issues if you file them separately.
0 coins
Liam Duke
•That's a good question. I always try to file attachments immediately after the main UCC-1 to avoid any gaps in coverage.
0 coins
Manny Lark
•The timing shouldn't matter as long as both documents are properly filed and cross-referenced. The perfection date should be based on when the main UCC-1 was filed.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
For what it's worth, I just went through a similar situation with a manufacturing equipment deal. Used Certana.ai to verify that my main UCC-1 and attachment were properly linked before submitting everything to the lender. Definitely gave me peace of mind.
0 coins
Khalid Howes
•How does that verification process work? Do you just upload both documents and it checks them against each other?
0 coins
Ben Cooper
•Yeah, you upload the PDFs and it automatically cross-checks things like filing numbers, debtor names, and collateral references to make sure everything matches up properly.
0 coins
Naila Gordon
Don't overthink this. UCC attachments are standard operating procedure for complex collateral. Your security interest is properly perfected as long as both documents are filed and properly cross-referenced, which it sounds like you did correctly.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
•Sometimes the simplest answer is the right one. If the SOS accepted both filings, you're probably in good shape.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
•I agree. The debtor's questions are probably just standard due diligence. Nothing to worry about.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
Just make sure you keep copies of both documents together in your files. When it comes time for amendments or terminations, you'll want to have the complete picture readily available.
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
•Good advice. I always keep attachment documents stapled or clipped to the main UCC-1 in my physical files.
0 coins
Demi Hall
•Digital file management is crucial too. Make sure both documents are linked in your document management system.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
Quick follow-up question - when you eventually need to terminate this UCC-1, do you need to reference both the main filing and the attachment in the UCC-3 termination? Or does terminating the main UCC-1 automatically terminate the attachment?
0 coins
Kara Yoshida
•Usually terminating the main UCC-1 should terminate the attachment too, but I'd reference both filing numbers in the termination just to be safe.
0 coins
Philip Cowan
•That's exactly what I would do. Better to over-reference than under-reference when it comes to terminations.
0 coins
Caesar Grant
•This is why I use Certana.ai for these complex filings. When you upload multiple related documents, it helps ensure you don't miss any cross-references in amendments or terminations.
0 coins