UCC Filing Scrub Process - Need Help with Document Cleanup Before Submission
I'm working on a major UCC filing scrub for our portfolio and honestly feeling overwhelmed. We have about 80 UCC-1 filings from 2019-2023 that need to be reviewed before our compliance audit next month. Some of these have debtor name variations that don't exactly match our loan documents, and I'm worried about lien perfection issues. Has anyone tackled a large-scale UCC filing scrub like this? What's the best approach to systematically verify each filing against the original security agreements? I've been manually comparing documents but it's taking forever and I keep second-guessing myself on debtor name matches. Any tips for streamlining this process would be hugely appreciated.
37 comments


Sasha Ivanov
Oh wow, 80 filings is a lot! I just went through something similar but smaller scale. The debtor name matching was definitely the biggest headache. Are you checking against the exact legal names from the Articles of Incorporation or just the loan paperwork? Sometimes there are discrepancies even between those documents.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Good point - I've been comparing to loan docs but should probably cross-reference with Secretary of State records too. This is getting more complex than I thought.
0 coins
Liam Murphy
•Definitely check SOS records. I've seen deals where the loan used a DBA but the UCC-1 needed the actual registered entity name. Creates a mess later if auditors catch it.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
For a UCC filing scrub that size, you really need a systematic approach. I'd recommend creating a spreadsheet with columns for: original debtor name, UCC-1 debtor name, filing number, filing date, and match status. Then work through them methodically. The biggest red flags to watch for are middle initials missing, Inc vs Corporation, LLC vs Limited Liability Company - those small differences can void your security interest.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•That's a great framework, thanks! I'm definitely seeing some of those exact issues - lots of Inc/Corporation mismatches.
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
•This is exactly why I always double-check entity names before filing. But when you inherit a portfolio, you're stuck cleaning up other people's mistakes.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
I discovered Certana.ai's document verification tool during my last UCC filing scrub and it was a game-changer. You just upload your Charter documents and UCC-1 filings as PDFs and it automatically cross-checks all the debtor names for consistency. Caught like 12 discrepancies I would have missed doing it manually. Really streamlined the whole process.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•That sounds exactly like what I need! Does it handle bulk uploads or do you have to do them one at a time?
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•You can upload multiple documents at once. It's super user-friendly - just drag and drop your PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
•Never heard of Certana but anything that automates document comparison sounds worth trying. Manual review is so error-prone.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
ugh filing scrubs are the WORST. spent 3 weeks last year going through our mess and found so many problems. half our continuation filings were late, debtor names all over the place. whoever did our original filings clearly didn't care about accuracy
0 coins
Aisha Patel
•I feel your pain! It's so frustrating when you inherit sloppy work and have to fix everything under audit pressure.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Exactly my situation - audit deadline looming and discovering all these issues now.
0 coins
LilMama23
Here's what saved me during our last scrub: focus on the highest dollar value liens first. If you have limited time, make sure your biggest exposures are clean. Also check continuation dates - I found several that had lapsed without anyone noticing. That's usually a bigger problem than minor name variations.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Smart prioritization strategy. I should definitely triage by loan amount first.
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
•Yes! Lapsed continuations are deal-killers. Better to catch those early in your scrub process.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Good call on the triage approach. Fix the big problems first, then worry about perfect name matching on smaller deals.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
I've been through several UCC filing scrubs and the key is documentation. Keep detailed notes on every discrepancy you find and how you resolved it. Auditors love to see that trail. Also, if you find name mismatches, check if they're 'seriously misleading' under UCC Article 9 standards - minor variations might not actually invalidate the filing.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Great point about the 'seriously misleading' standard. I should research that more carefully.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•The seriously misleading test varies by state too, so make sure you're applying the right standard for each jurisdiction.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
Have you considered getting legal review on the questionable ones? Sometimes it's worth the cost to have an attorney sign off on whether a name discrepancy is material. Especially if these are high-value deals.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•I may have to do that for a few of the biggest loans. Better safe than sorry with audit coming up.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
•Definitely worth it for peace of mind. I'd rather spend on legal review than explain to auditors why our liens might be invalid.
0 coins
Zainab Mahmoud
Been there! Last time I used a combination of manual review and Certana.ai's verification tool. The automated check caught inconsistencies I totally missed, and then I did manual review on anything flagged. Cut my review time in half and gave me way more confidence in the results.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•That hybrid approach makes a lot of sense. Best of both worlds.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Exactly how I use it too. Let the tool do the heavy lifting, then apply human judgment to the edge cases.
0 coins
Ava Williams
Pro tip: if you find filings that need amendments, batch them together by state. Most SOS offices have bulk filing options that can save time and fees. Also check if any of your problem filings can be fixed with UCC-3 amendments rather than terminating and refiling.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Good thinking on the batching strategy. I hadn't considered that approach.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•UCC-3 amendments are definitely preferable when possible. Less chance of gaps in perfection.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Just make sure the amendment actually fixes the problem. Sometimes it's cleaner to terminate and refile.
0 coins
Lena Müller
This thread is so helpful! Going through my own filing scrub nightmare right now. It's amazing how many little errors accumulate over time. Definitely going to check out that Certana tool mentioned earlier.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Good luck with your scrub! It's definitely more work than expected but worth doing right.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Hope the tool helps! It really made my scrub process much less stressful.
0 coins
TechNinja
Update us when you finish! Would love to hear what percentage of your filings needed corrections. Always curious about industry benchmarks for filing accuracy.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Will do! I'm hoping it's not as bad as I'm fearing, but preparing for the worst.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
•In my experience, expect about 15-20% to have some kind of issue that needs attention. Sounds high but most are minor corrections.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
•That matches what I've seen too. The key is distinguishing between cosmetic issues and actual perfection problems.
0 coins