< Back to UCC Document Community

Javier Torres

UCC Filing Oregon - Debtor Name Rejected Twice Need Help

Hey everyone, really frustrated here and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. I've been trying to get a UCC filing Oregon processed for the past month and keep hitting roadblocks with debtor name issues. We're securing equipment financing for a client whose LLC name has some quirks - it's something like "ABC Solutions & Consulting, LLC" but the Secretary of State keeps rejecting our UCC-1 because of name matching problems. First rejection said the ampersand wasn't matching their records, so we spelled out "and" instead. Second rejection came back saying we're still not matching exactly. I pulled the Articles of Incorporation and thought I had it right but apparently not. The loan docs are already signed and we're supposed to close next week. Anyone dealt with Oregon's specific name matching requirements? I'm starting to think there's some hidden character or spacing issue I'm missing. Really need to get this perfected before our lender starts asking questions about the delay.

Emma Davis

•

Oregon can be really picky about exact name matches. Have you tried pulling a current Certificate of Good Standing instead of just relying on the Articles? Sometimes the entity name gets updated after formation and the CGS will show the current official name exactly as it appears in their system.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

That's a great point - I was just using the Articles from formation. I'll request a current Certificate of Good Standing. Do you know if Oregon charges for those or can I get it online?

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

You can get it online through their business registry for like $10. It's worth it to avoid another rejection. The exact name formatting there should match what UCC expects.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

•

I've seen this exact issue! Oregon's system is super sensitive to punctuation and spacing. Even an extra space can cause rejection. Try copying the name character-by-character from their official records rather than retyping it.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

This happened to me last year. Turned out there was a period after LLC that I kept missing. Oregon doesn't mess around with these details.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Oh wow, that could totally be it. I'll compare character by character. How long did your correction take to process?

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

Once I got the name exactly right it went through same day. But those rejections cost me almost two weeks total.

0 coins

Had a similar nightmare with Oregon filings last month. After the third rejection I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your UCC-1 and the entity documents and it instantly flags any name mismatches before you submit. Saved me from another round of rejections and got it right the first time after that.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Never heard of that but sounds exactly what I need. Is it expensive to use?

0 coins

It's just a simple upload process - you drag in your UCC form and the corporate docs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Really straightforward and caught the spacing issue I had been missing.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

That actually sounds useful. I always manually compare documents but an automated check would be faster.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

OREGON IS THE WORST FOR THIS STUFF!!! I've had so many rejections over tiny formatting issues. Their system acts like it's 1995. Why can't they just have fuzzy matching like normal databases?

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

I feel your pain but the strict matching actually protects against fraudulent filings. Still annoying though.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

I get the security aspect but come on, rejecting over a space character? There has to be a better way.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Quick question - are you using the Oregon SOS electronic filing system or paper? The electronic system sometimes has different formatting requirements than paper filings.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Electronic system. Should I try paper instead or stick with electronic once I get the name right?

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Stick with electronic, it's faster processing once accepted. Just make sure you're copying from their exact electronic records.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Electronic is definitely the way to go. Paper takes forever and still has the same name matching requirements.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

I always run into issues with LLC names that have special characters. Oregon seems particularly strict about commas, periods, and ampersands. Have you considered calling their UCC division directly to ask what the exact name format should be?

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Good idea, though I wasn't sure if they'd give specific guidance over the phone. Worth a try though.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

They're usually pretty helpful if you have the entity number handy. Sometimes they'll even tell you exactly how the name appears in their system.

0 coins

This reminds me of when I had to file a continuation last year and kept getting rejections because the original UCC-1 had a slightly different debtor name format. Turned out the company had filed an amendment to their Articles changing the punctuation. Always worth checking if there have been any amendments since your original information.

0 coins

That's a really good point about amendments. Corporate changes can definitely affect UCC filings.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

I'll check for any amendments too. This LLC is only about 2 years old but you never know.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

Are you sure you're using the correct entity type designation? Sometimes companies file as 'Limited Liability Company' in their Articles but use 'LLC' in practice, or vice versa.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

The Articles definitely say LLC so that should be right. But I'll double-check the Certificate of Good Standing when I get it.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

Yeah, the CGS will be your best bet for the current official format.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Just went through this exact scenario with a different state but similar issues. After multiple rejections I discovered there was actually a hidden character in the company name that wasn't visible when I copied it. Using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier helped me spot it - apparently their system shows you exactly where the discrepancies are.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Hidden characters would explain a lot! I'm definitely going to try that verification tool before submitting again.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Hidden characters are the worst. Sometimes copying from PDFs can introduce weird formatting that you can't see.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Oregon processing times are actually pretty fast once you get it right - usually same day for electronic filings. The key is just getting that debtor name perfect. I learned to always triple-check against the most recent official documents.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

That's encouraging about the processing time. I'm really hoping to get this resolved this week.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

You should be fine once you nail the name format. Oregon is strict but efficient.

0 coins

Update us when you get it figured out! I'm curious what the actual issue turns out to be. These Oregon name matching problems seem really common.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Will do! I'm planning to get the Certificate of Good Standing tomorrow and try the document verification tool before resubmitting.

0 coins

Good luck! Those tools really do help catch the tiny details that cause rejections.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Hope it works out. Name matching issues are so frustrating but usually have simple solutions once you find them.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today