UCC Filing After Real Estate Security Agreement with Alienation Clause - Need Help
Working on a commercial real estate deal where the security agreement includes an alienation clause that allows for transfer under specific conditions. My question is about the UCC-1 filing requirements when this type of clause exists. The debtor is a LLC that owns the property, and we're securing both the real estate and equipment/fixtures. I'm getting conflicting advice on whether the alienation language affects how we describe the collateral on the UCC-1. Some sources say we need to reference the alienation provisions in our collateral description, others say standard fixture filing language is sufficient. The loan amount is substantial ($2.3M) so I really can't afford to mess this up. Has anyone dealt with UCC filings where the underlying security agreement contains alienation clauses that allow for specific transfer scenarios? Not sure if this creates any special requirements for the UCC-1 or if I'm overthinking this. The borrower's attorney mentioned something about making sure our UCC filing doesn't conflict with the alienation terms but didn't elaborate much. Any guidance would be really appreciated since I need to get this filed correctly the first time.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Dmitry Smirnov
The alienation clause in your security agreement shouldn't directly impact your UCC-1 collateral description. The UCC filing is about perfecting your security interest, not about transfer restrictions. Your collateral description should focus on accurately identifying what you're securing - the fixtures and equipment. The alienation clause is a separate contractual provision between you and the borrower about transfer conditions.
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
•This makes sense but I'm still worried about potential conflicts. What if the alienation clause allows transfers that could affect our lien priority?
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•Your UCC-1 filing establishes your priority date regardless of future transfers allowed by the alienation clause. The key is making sure your collateral description is broad enough to cover everything you intend to secure.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
I had a similar situation last year with a retail property deal. The alienation clause allowed for transfers to affiliated entities under certain conditions. What I learned is that your UCC-1 needs to be rock solid on the collateral description and debtor name accuracy. The alienation clause is really about the contractual relationship, not the UCC perfection requirements. Make sure you're using the exact legal name of the LLC as it appears on the state filing records.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•That's helpful - did you end up doing anything special with your fixture filing language because of the alienation provisions?
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•No, I used standard fixture filing language. The alienation clause didn't change my UCC requirements. Just made sure the real estate description was accurate for the fixture filing aspect.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
Actually ran into document consistency issues on a deal like this recently. Had the security agreement with alienation language, but when I compared it to my draft UCC-1, there were some debtor name variations that would have caused problems. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you just upload your security agreement and UCC-1 PDFs and it instantly flags any inconsistencies in debtor names, entity details, that kind of stuff. Caught a middle initial discrepancy that would have gotten the filing rejected. Really saved me from a headache since the alienation clause made me paranoid about getting everything exactly right.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How does it work exactly?
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Super straightforward - upload your documents as PDFs and it cross-checks all the key details automatically. Shows you exactly where there are mismatches so you can fix them before filing.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Debtor name accuracy is huge. I've seen filings rejected for the smallest variations even when the alienation terms were perfect.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
Wait, I'm confused about something. If the alienation clause allows for transfers, doesn't that mean the debtor could change? How does that affect our UCC-1 filing? Do we need to file amendments every time there's a transfer under the alienation provisions?
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•Good question but you're mixing up concepts. The alienation clause typically governs when transfers are allowed without triggering acceleration. It doesn't automatically change your debtor on the UCC-1.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
•Right, if there's an actual transfer to a new entity, then you'd need to consider a UCC-3 amendment to add the new debtor, but that's separate from just having the alienation clause in your agreement.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
•OK that makes more sense. So the clause itself doesn't create UCC filing requirements, just the actual transfers if they happen.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
You're definitely overthinking this. I've done dozens of commercial real estate deals with alienation clauses. Your UCC-1 requirements are the same regardless of what transfer provisions are in your security agreement. Focus on getting your debtor name exactly right, making sure your collateral description covers everything you want to secure, and if you're doing a fixture filing make sure the real estate description is accurate. The alienation clause is contract law, UCC filing is secured transactions law - different animals.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•Thanks, that's reassuring. I think I was getting too caught up in trying to make everything connect when they're really separate issues.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Exactly. Keep it simple - perfect your lien with a proper UCC-1, worry about the alienation clause implications if and when there's an actual transfer.
0 coins
Amina Sy
Just want to echo what others said about debtor name accuracy. With a $2.3M deal you absolutely cannot afford a rejected filing. I always triple-check the LLC name against the secretary of state records. Also, since you mentioned fixtures, make sure you're clear on whether you're doing a central filing or local filing for the fixture aspects.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•Good point about the fixture filing location. I was planning on central filing since it's equipment and fixtures, not pure real estate collateral.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•That should be fine for equipment. Just make sure your collateral description is clear about what's fixtures versus equipment if there's any gray area.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•Also remember that fixture filings require the real estate description in addition to the debtor/secured party info.
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and I can tell you the alienation clause isn't going to impact your filing requirements. But since you're stressed about it, might be worth having someone double-check your documents before filing. I know some people use automated tools now to verify everything matches up between their security agreements and UCC forms.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Yeah, document verification tools are becoming more common. Takes the guesswork out of making sure all your entity names and details are consistent.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•Someone mentioned Certana.ai earlier - might look into that since I really want to be sure everything's perfect.
0 coins
Javier Garcia
One thing to consider - if your security agreement gives you rights in after-acquired property and the alienation clause allows transfers, you might want to make sure your UCC-1 collateral description is broad enough to cover property acquired after any permitted transfers. Not directly related to the alienation clause itself, but could be relevant to your overall security position.
0 coins
Emma Taylor
•Good point about after-acquired property language. Always better to be broader rather than narrower on collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•We do have after-acquired property provisions so I'll make sure the UCC-1 reflects that appropriately.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
Honestly, the fact that you're being this careful about a $2.3M deal shows you're on the right track. The alienation clause won't affect your UCC filing directly, but being thorough never hurts. Just make sure you file before your deadline and that all your entity information is spot-on.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•Agreed. Better to double-check everything than deal with a rejected filing and potential priority issues.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•Thanks everyone. Feeling much more confident about moving forward with the standard UCC-1 approach.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
Late to the party but wanted to add - if you're still nervous about document consistency, definitely worth using one of those verification tools. I've used Certana.ai a few times now and it's pretty slick. Upload your security agreement and UCC-1 draft, and it immediately shows you any inconsistencies in debtor names, addresses, entity types, etc. For a deal this size, the peace of mind is worth it.
0 coins
CosmosCaptain
•How accurate are those automated checks? I'm always skeptical of relying too much on technology for legal documents.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•It's not replacing legal review, just catching the basic inconsistencies that cause rejections. Still need to use your judgment on the legal requirements.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•That sounds like exactly what I need - something to catch the basic errors while I focus on the legal requirements.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
As someone who's handled UCC filings for complex commercial deals, I can confirm what others have said - the alienation clause in your security agreement is a separate contractual matter that doesn't directly impact your UCC-1 filing requirements. Your focus should be on the fundamentals: accurate debtor name (verify against state records), comprehensive collateral description, and proper fixture filing procedures if applicable. The alienation clause governs transfer conditions, while your UCC-1 establishes and perfects your security interest. For a $2.3M deal, I'd recommend having someone review your documents for consistency before filing, but don't let the alienation provisions complicate what should be a straightforward UCC filing process.
0 coins