UCC Article 9 Official Comments - Where to Find Complete Text for Filing Interpretation?
I'm working on a complex secured transaction involving mixed collateral types (equipment + inventory) and need to reference the official comments to UCC Article 9 for proper interpretation. My bank's compliance team is questioning some of our collateral descriptions on recent UCC-1 filings, specifically whether we're being too broad or too narrow in our descriptions. The issue came up during our quarterly lien audit - we've got about 47 active UCC-1 filings across different states, and there's inconsistency in how we're describing similar collateral. Some describe "all equipment" while others get granular with "manufacturing equipment, office equipment, computer equipment, etc." I know the official comments provide guidance on collateral description requirements, but I'm having trouble locating the complete text online. Are these comments freely available somewhere, or do I need to purchase access through a legal database? Also wondering if anyone has experience with how strictly different SOS offices interpret the collateral description requirements based on these official comments. This is for a $2.3M credit facility, so getting the descriptions right is critical. Any guidance on accessing the official comments or interpreting collateral description requirements would be hugely appreciated.
37 comments
Join the conversation
Zoe Alexopoulos
The UCC Article 9 official comments are usually available through your state's Secretary of State website, though the formatting can be terrible. For commercial lending work, I'd recommend checking if your institution has access to a legal database like Westlaw or Lexis - they have the comments with better search functionality. For collateral descriptions, the official comments generally favor broader descriptions over ultra-specific ones. "All equipment" is typically sufficient and actually preferred over trying to list every possible piece of equipment. The comments emphasize that the description just needs to reasonably identify the collateral.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•This is exactly right about broader vs. specific descriptions. I learned this the hard way when we had a UCC-1 rejected because we tried to be too specific and accidentally excluded some equipment types. The SOS office said our description was "confusingly narrow" - never heard that before!
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Wait, which state rejected for being too specific? That seems backwards from what I've always heard. Most states want you to be as descriptive as possible to avoid conflicts with other secured parties.
0 coins
Zoe Alexopoulos
•It depends on the state, but generally the official comments support reasonable identification over exhaustive lists. The key is making sure you don't accidentally exclude collateral by being overly specific. "All equipment" covers everything, while listing specific types might leave gaps.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
For free access, try the Uniform Law Commission website - they maintain the official text and comments for all UCC articles. It's not the most user-friendly format, but it's complete and free. Regarding your mixed collateral situation, I'd suggest separate UCC-1 filings for equipment vs. inventory if the loan structures are different. Makes amendments and terminations much cleaner down the road.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•Thanks for the ULC tip! I'll check there first before asking our legal team to pull up Westlaw. The separate filing approach is interesting - hadn't considered that. Would that require separate security agreements as well, or can one agreement cover multiple UCC-1s?
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•One security agreement can definitely cover multiple UCC-1 filings. We do this regularly when we have different priorities or different debtors within the same credit relationship. Just make sure your security agreement language is broad enough to cover all the filings.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
I ran into something similar last month with a $1.8M equipment financing deal. Had 3 different UCC-1s get kicked back for "insufficient collateral description" even though we used the same language that worked fine in other states. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to upload our security agreement and UCC-1 drafts before filing. It caught several inconsistencies between our security agreement collateral description and what we were putting on the UCC-1 forms. Saved us from multiple rejection cycles.
0 coins
Amara Eze
•How does that verification tool work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs and it compares them automatically?
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•Yeah, exactly - you upload your security agreement and UCC-1 form PDFs, and it automatically cross-checks for consistency in debtor names, collateral descriptions, and other key fields. Really helpful for catching those tiny discrepancies that cause rejections.
0 coins
Giovanni Greco
•That sounds like it could be useful for our quarterly lien audits too. We're always finding small inconsistencies between our loan files and what's actually on file with the SOS offices.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
The official comments are definitely your best resource for interpretation questions. One thing to note - different states sometimes have non-uniform amendments to Article 9, so make sure you're looking at the comments that apply to your specific filing states. For your collateral description issue, the key principle from the comments is "reasonable identification." As long as a third party could understand what collateral is covered, you're generally okay. "All equipment" meets this standard in most cases.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
•This is a great point about non-uniform amendments. Louisiana and a few other states have their own quirks that aren't covered in the standard official comments.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Do you know if there's a good resource that tracks which states have non-uniform provisions? I feel like I'm always discovering these by accident during filings.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
•The ULC website has a comparison chart showing state variations, but it's not always current. Most of the major legal databases also have state-by-state UCC guides that highlight the differences.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and honestly, the official comments are helpful but don't stress too much about perfect interpretation. Most SOS offices are pretty reasonable about collateral descriptions as long as you're in the ballpark. Your bigger concern with 47 active filings should be continuation deadlines. Make sure you've got a good tracking system for those 5-year renewals.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•Good point on the continuation tracking. We use a spreadsheet system now but it's getting unwieldy. Any recommendations for better tracking methods?
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
•Most loan management systems have UCC tracking modules, but they're often clunky. I've seen some firms use dedicated UCC management software, but that might be overkill for your volume.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•We tried a few different UCC tracking systems and ended up going back to a well-organized spreadsheet with calendar reminders. Sometimes simple is better.
0 coins
Ava Rodriguez
Just went through this exact research for a client presentation. Found the most complete version of the official comments on HeinOnline if your firm has access. They have historical versions too, which is helpful if you're dealing with older filings. One thing from the comments that might help your situation - they specifically address "all assets" vs. specific category descriptions. The comments favor broader language because it reduces the risk of inadvertent exclusions.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•HeinOnline is great but expensive. For most practical purposes, the free ULC version is sufficient unless you need the historical context.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•I'd be curious to see that client presentation if you're able to share any insights. We're always looking for better ways to explain UCC requirements to our commercial clients.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
Quick question on your mixed collateral situation - are you dealing with purchase money security interests on any of the equipment? The official comments have specific guidance on PMSI priority that might affect how you structure your filings.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•Some of it is PMSI, some is general lien. We've been filing everything as general collateral to keep it simple, but you're right that the official comments might have better guidance on maintaining PMSI priority.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Definitely worth reviewing - PMSI priority can be really valuable, especially for equipment financing. The comments have specific requirements for maintaining that priority status.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
I hate dealing with UCC Article 9 official comments - they're written like academic papers instead of practical guidance. Give me a simple checklist over 50 pages of commentary any day. That said, for your collateral description problems, I'd just standardize on "all equipment, machinery, and fixtures" for equipment loans and "all inventory" for inventory loans. Never had a rejection with those descriptions.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•I feel the same way about the academic writing style, but sometimes you really need the detailed guidance when dealing with edge cases or aggressive opposing counsel.
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
•Your standardized descriptions make sense, but what about when you need to exclude certain equipment types? Like vehicles that need to be titled separately?
0 coins
AstroAlpha
•Good point - for exclusions, I usually go with "all equipment except motor vehicles" or whatever needs to be carved out. Keeps it simple but covers the exceptions.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
For what it's worth, I've found that calling the SOS filing office directly can sometimes give you better practical guidance than reading through the official comments. Most of the experienced staff know exactly what descriptions they'll accept and what causes problems.
0 coins
Amina Bah
•This is great advice that more people should follow. The SOS staff deal with these filings all day and usually know the common pitfalls better than anyone.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
•I tried this approach recently and got completely different answers from different people at the same office. Seems like consistency is still an issue even within individual SOS offices.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
Last thought on this - if you're doing quarterly lien audits anyway, might be worth checking out Certana.ai's UCC document verification. I started using it after our audit found several name mismatches between our UCC-1s and the actual corporate records. It's saved us from some potentially serious perfection issues. Just upload your filings and it automatically flags inconsistencies. Makes the audit process much more thorough without adding manual work.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•How often do you find name mismatches in practice? I always worry about this but haven't had issues yet (knock on wood).
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•More often than you'd think, especially with corporate name changes or when dealing with subsidiaries. The verification tool caught about 6 issues out of 30 filings in our last audit - small discrepancies but potentially big problems.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
Great discussion here! I've been lurking in this community for a while but finally decided to jump in since I'm dealing with similar UCC filing challenges at my credit union. Just wanted to add that the American Law Institute website also has the official comments available for free, though like others mentioned, the formatting isn't great. What I've found helpful is downloading the PDF version and using the search function to quickly find relevant sections. For your mixed collateral situation with equipment + inventory, one approach we've used is to include both in a single UCC-1 but use separate security agreement schedules. This gives you the flexibility to amend or release specific collateral types without affecting the entire filing. Also, regarding the quarterly lien audit process - we implemented a simple tracking spreadsheet that includes filing dates, continuation deadlines, and links to the actual filed documents. Has saved us from missing renewal deadlines on several occasions.
0 coins
Freya Ross
•Welcome to the community! That's a really practical approach with the separate security agreement schedules - gives you the best of both worlds with flexibility while keeping filing costs down. The ALI website tip is great too, I hadn't thought to check there. Your tracking spreadsheet approach sounds similar to what we're trying to implement. Do you include any automated reminder features, or do you just review it manually on a regular schedule?
0 coins