< Back to UCC Document Community

Isabella Oliveira

UCC 5 PDF template needed - where to find official forms?

I'm trying to locate a proper UCC 5 PDF form for an information statement filing and having trouble finding the right template. My attorney mentioned we need to file this to provide additional information about a UCC-1 that was rejected due to incomplete collateral description. The original filing was for equipment financing on manufacturing machinery worth about $850,000. The SOS portal keeps directing me to standard UCC-1 and UCC-3 forms but I can't seem to locate the UCC 5 PDF anywhere on their site. Has anyone dealt with information statement filings recently? I'm worried about missing the window to correct our original filing since the lender is getting antsy about perfecting their security interest. Any guidance on where to download the official UCC 5 PDF would be hugely appreciated.

UCC 5 forms aren't as common as the standard UCC-1 and UCC-3 filings. Most states use the same basic template but you'll want to check your specific SOS website under their secured transactions section. The form is typically labeled as 'Information Statement' rather than just UCC 5. What state are you filing in? That makes a big difference for where to find the right PDF.

0 coins

Thanks for the quick response. I'm filing in Colorado and you're right - searching for 'Information Statement' pulls up more results than just UCC 5.

0 coins

Colorado's SOS site has their UCC forms under Business Services → UCC Filings. The UCC 5 should be there with their other standard forms.

0 coins

I had to file a UCC 5 last year when our debtor name got mangled in the original UCC-1. Total nightmare trying to figure out the right format. Most states follow the standard form but some have their own quirks. Make sure you're using the current version - some of these PDFs floating around online are outdated and will get rejected.

0 coins

This is exactly why I always double-check document versions before filing anything. One wrong form version and you're back to square one.

0 coins

Good point about version checking. I definitely don't want to go through another rejection cycle.

0 coins

Actually ran into this exact issue recently. I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after getting burned by an outdated UCC-3 form. You can upload your UCC 5 PDF along with your original UCC-1 and it instantly checks for consistency issues, version problems, and name mismatches. Saved me from another rejection.

0 coins

Wait, why do you need a UCC 5 for a rejected UCC-1? If your original filing was rejected, wouldn't you just refile an amended UCC-1 with the correct collateral description? Information statements are usually for correcting errors in accepted filings, not dealing with rejections.

0 coins

Good catch! If the UCC-1 was actually rejected (not just accepted with errors), then refiling a corrected UCC-1 would be the normal path.

0 coins

You might be right about this. I need to clarify with my attorney whether the filing was rejected or accepted with issues. The paperwork wasn't entirely clear.

0 coins

This confusion happens ALL the time. Rejected vs accepted-but-problematic are totally different scenarios requiring different forms.

0 coins

Whatever you do, don't use some random UCC 5 PDF you find on a third-party website. I learned this the hard way when I downloaded what looked like an official form that turned out to be from 2019. The SOS rejected it immediately and I lost three weeks.

0 coins

Ugh, been there. State websites can be confusing but they're the only reliable source for current forms.

0 coins

This is exactly why I switched to using verification tools. Too many variables to keep track of manually.

0 coins

For Colorado specifically, you want form UCC5 (Information Statement) from their official site. It's a fillable PDF that you can complete electronically. Just make sure you're including all the required information about the original filing you're correcting. The filing fee is usually around $20-25.

0 coins

Perfect, thank you! That's exactly what I needed to know about Colorado's process.

0 coins

Colorado's electronic filing system is actually pretty good once you get the hang of it. Much better than some other states I've dealt with.

0 coins

Just remember to keep copies of everything for your records. Colorado doesn't always send confirmation emails right away.

0 coins

Since you mentioned this is for equipment financing, make sure your UCC 5 clearly references the original filing number and provides the complete collateral description that was missing. Equipment descriptions need to be specific enough to identify the particular machinery - general descriptions like 'all equipment' usually aren't sufficient for big-ticket items.

0 coins

That's a great point about the collateral description specificity. The original description was definitely too vague.

0 coins

For manufacturing equipment, include make, model, serial numbers if available. Lenders really care about being able to identify specific assets.

0 coins

I've seen filings get challenged later because the collateral description was too broad. Better to be overly specific than too general.

0 coins

One more thing - if time is a factor because your lender is getting impatient, consider calling the SOS filing office directly. Sometimes they can expedite processing or at least give you a realistic timeline for when the UCC 5 will be processed.

0 coins

Good advice. Most SOS offices are surprisingly helpful when you call during business hours.

0 coins

I'll definitely give them a call tomorrow morning. Thanks for all the helpful responses everyone!

0 coins

Before you file anything, I'd recommend running your documents through a consistency check. I use Certana.ai for this - you upload your UCC 5 PDF along with the original filing documents and it flags any mismatches in debtor names, filing numbers, or other critical details. Catches errors before they become rejections.

0 coins

Just want to echo what others said about document verification. I had a UCC 5 rejected because I accidentally used a slightly different version of the debtor's legal name than what was on the original UCC-1. These consistency issues are so easy to miss when you're doing manual comparisons.

0 coins

Name consistency is huge with UCC filings. Even small differences like 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' can cause problems.

0 coins

This is why automated checking tools are becoming more popular. Too many details to track manually.

0 coins

Absolutely agree. I started using Certana.ai after a similar name mismatch issue cost me weeks of delays. Now I upload all my UCC documents for cross-checking before filing - catches things I would never notice.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today