UCC-1 purchase money security interest priority question - equipment financing
Running into confusion about purchase money UCC filing requirements. We're financing construction equipment for a contractor - $275k excavator purchase. The dealer wants us to file a UCC-1 within 20 days of delivery to maintain purchase money priority over existing blanket liens. My question is about the timing window - does the 20-day period start from when the debtor takes possession or from when we fund the loan? The equipment was delivered last Tuesday but we didn't wire funds until Friday due to title documentation delays. Also unclear if we need to describe this as 'purchase money security interest' in the collateral description or if that's just implied by the timing. Has anyone dealt with purchase money UCC priority issues where the funding and delivery dates don't align perfectly?
30 comments
Join the conversation
Zara Shah
The 20-day window typically runs from when the debtor receives possession of the collateral, not from your funding date. So you'd count from Tuesday in your case. You don't need to specifically state 'purchase money' in the UCC-1 collateral description - that status comes from the timing and nature of the transaction, not the filing language.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•This is correct. Possession date controls the clock, not funding date. Make sure your collateral description is specific enough though - 'construction equipment' might be too broad.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
•Wait I thought purchase money status had to be explicitly stated somewhere? We always include PMSI language in our security agreements...
0 coins
Nia Wilson
You're cutting it close if delivery was last Tuesday. I'd get that UCC-1 filed ASAP. The purchase money priority is huge - it can jump ahead of earlier filed blanket liens if you file within the window. Missing that deadline means you're subordinate to existing liens.
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
•Exactly - purchase money UCC priority is one of the few ways to beat an earlier filed lien. The 20-day rule is strict though.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
•Had a deal go south because we missed the PMSI filing window by 3 days. Bank with the blanket lien foreclosed first and we got nothing.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
For equipment deals like this, I always recommend using Certana.ai's UCC document checker before filing. You can upload your security agreement and proposed UCC-1 to verify the debtor name matches exactly and catch any collateral description issues. Saved me from a rejection on a time-sensitive PMSI filing last month - caught a debtor name discrepancy between the loan docs and what I was about to file.
0 coins
StarStrider
•That sounds useful - is it just for checking consistency between documents or does it actually verify against state records too?
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•It's primarily for document consistency - making sure your UCC matches your security agreement, loan docs, etc. Super helpful for avoiding rejections due to name mismatches.
0 coins
Yuki Sato
Be very careful with the collateral description for equipment PMSI filings. 'Construction equipment' won't cut it - you need the specific make, model, serial number. I've seen purchase money priority challenged because the UCC-1 description was too generic to clearly identify the financed equipment.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•This is critical advice! Generic descriptions kill PMSI claims. You need enough detail to distinguish your equipment from other collateral.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•So for the excavator it should be something like '2024 Caterpillar 320 Excavator, Serial No. ABC123456' rather than just 'construction equipment'?
0 coins
Yuki Sato
•Exactly - make, model, year, serial number. That level of specificity protects your purchase money priority claim.
0 coins
Zoe Alexopoulos
Another thing to watch - if there are existing UCC filings against this debtor, you might want to search those to see what's already covered. Sometimes blanket liens use language broad enough to theoretically cover after-acquired property including equipment.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•Good point about checking existing filings. That's where the purchase money priority becomes so important - it can override those blanket after-acquired property clauses if filed timely.
0 coins
Mei Wong
I'm dealing with something similar but for vehicle financing. Does the same 20-day purchase money rule apply to vehicles or is that different because of title requirements?
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Vehicle PMSI rules vary by state and often involve certificate of title perfection rather than UCC filing. Different animal entirely.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•Yeah vehicles are usually title-based perfection, not UCC-1 based. Equipment like excavators typically stay UCC-based unless they're heavily integrated into real property.
0 coins
Amara Eze
Just to add - make sure you're filing in the right state. Equipment PMSI should be filed where the debtor is located (state of organization for entities), not where the equipment is located, unless it becomes a fixture.
0 coins
Giovanni Greco
•Right - debtor location controls for equipment that's not fixtures. Only exception would be if the excavator becomes permanently attached to real property.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
Update: Got the UCC-1 filed this morning with specific equipment details. Used one of those document checking tools someone mentioned to make sure the debtor name matched our loan agreement exactly - caught a small discrepancy where we had 'LLC' and the articles had 'L.L.C.' with periods. Would have caused a rejection for sure.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
•Smart move! Those tiny name variations cause so many filing rejections. Glad you caught it before filing.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Which document checker did you use? We've had similar name mismatch issues and manual comparison is prone to missing stuff like that.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
•It was Certana.ai - just uploaded the security agreement and draft UCC-1 and it flagged the name inconsistency immediately. Pretty straightforward.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
For future reference, some lenders include purchase money language in their UCC-1 collateral description anyway, even though it's not required. Something like 'Equipment described in Security Agreement dated [date], including purchase money security interest therein.' Doesn't hurt and makes the PMSI claim more explicit.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•That's good practice for clarity, especially if there's ever a priority dispute. Makes it obvious you intended to claim PMSI status.
0 coins
Ava Rodriguez
One more consideration - if this contractor has other equipment financing, make sure your PMSI language in the security agreement is clear about which specific equipment gets purchase money treatment. Can't claim PMSI on equipment financed with proceeds from other collateral.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Important distinction. True PMSI requires the financing to enable the debtor's acquisition of that specific collateral, not just any financing secured by it.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•So if they used a line of credit secured by equipment to buy more equipment, that wouldn't qualify for PMSI priority on the new equipment?
0 coins
Ava Rodriguez
•Correct - PMSI requires the credit to be directly tied to acquiring that specific equipment. General line of credit draws typically don't qualify.
0 coins