UCC 1-308 Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights - Filing Questions
I'm dealing with a complex secured transaction where the debtor is trying to invoke UCC 1-308 performance or acceptance under reservation of rights regarding our UCC-1 filing. They're claiming that by accepting our financing terms, they're not waiving any rights to challenge the security interest later. Has anyone encountered this in their UCC filings? I'm wondering if this affects how we should structure our continuation filings or if we need to file any amendments to protect our lien position. The debtor keeps referencing UCC 1-308 in their correspondence and I want to make sure our UCC-3 filings are bulletproof when we do our continuation next year. Any experience with debtors using this section to challenge secured party rights after the fact?
41 comments
Join the conversation
Ethan Wilson
UCC 1-308 doesn't really impact your filing strategy. That section just codifies what was already common law - a party can perform under a contract while reserving rights to challenge it later. Your UCC-1 filing creates the security interest, and their invocation of 1-308 doesn't affect the perfection of your lien. Just make sure your debtor name matches exactly on all your filings.
0 coins
NeonNova
•Exactly right. I've seen debtors try this multiple times and it never affects the actual security interest. The UCC-1 filing stands on its own merits.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•But what if they're claiming the original security agreement is invalid? Wouldn't that affect the UCC filing?
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
I ran into something similar last year. The debtor kept citing UCC 1-308 in every piece of correspondence. Turns out they were working with some sovereign citizen advisor who was feeding them bad legal theories. The section doesn't give them any special power to invalidate your security interest just by saying magic words.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Oh no, not the sovereign citizen stuff again. They love throwing around UCC sections without understanding what they actually mean.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•That's exactly what I'm dealing with! They keep sending letters with all these UCC references that don't seem to apply to our situation.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•Yeah, unfortunately there's a whole cottage industry of people selling bad legal advice about using UCC 1-308 to somehow escape debts. It doesn't work that way.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
I actually had a case where we got worried about this exact issue and ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to double-check that our UCC-1 and security agreement were perfectly aligned. You can upload both documents and it instantly flags any inconsistencies in debtor names, collateral descriptions, or other critical details. Really gave us peace of mind when the debtor was challenging everything.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•That sounds helpful - were there actually inconsistencies that you found?
0 coins
Emily Jackson
•We found a minor discrepancy in how the collateral was described between the security agreement and UCC-1. Nothing that would void the filing, but it gave the debtor less ammunition for their challenges.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
Wait, I'm confused. I thought UCC 1-308 was about reserving rights when you sign something under duress. Does this apply to voluntary financing agreements?
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•It's not specifically about duress. It's about performing under a contract while preserving your right to challenge the contract's validity or terms later.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
•So if I sign a loan agreement but write 'UCC 1-308' next to my signature, I can challenge it later?
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•You can challenge it regardless of whether you write that or not. The section doesn't give you any special powers.
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
Focus on the basics - is your UCC-1 filed correctly? Debtor name spelled exactly as on the security agreement? Collateral description adequate? If yes, then their UCC 1-308 posturing is just noise. I've never seen it successfully invalidate a properly perfected security interest.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Yes, we triple-checked the debtor name against their articles of incorporation. Should be solid there.
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
•Good. Then you're probably fine. Document everything they send you though, in case you need to show a pattern of frivolous challenges later.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
•What about the collateral description? That's where I usually see problems that give debtors real grounds to challenge.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
I hate when debtors start throwing around UCC sections they don't understand. It just creates unnecessary paperwork and confusion. Last time this happened to me, I had to get our attorney involved just to explain why their position was nonsense.
0 coins
Maya Patel
•Same here. It's so frustrating because it wastes everyone's time and money.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•At least I'm not the only one dealing with this kind of thing.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
The key thing to understand is that UCC 1-308 is about contract performance, not about UCC filings. They're two different areas of law. Your security interest is created by the security agreement, and perfected by the UCC-1 filing. Their reservation of rights under 1-308 might affect their obligations under the loan agreement, but it doesn't touch your lien position.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•That's a really helpful distinction. So I should focus on making sure the UCC filings are correct rather than worrying about their 1-308 claims?
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Exactly. Keep your filings clean and current, and let your attorney deal with any contract disputes they want to raise.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
•This is why I always recommend having both a good UCC filing system and a good commercial attorney on speed dial.
0 coins
Ava Kim
Check your state's UCC database to make sure your filing actually went through properly. Sometimes what looks like debtor gamesmanship is actually them spotting a problem with your filing that you missed.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Good point - I should pull a fresh search report to verify everything looks right in the system.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
•That's another thing Certana.ai helped us with - we uploaded our filed UCC-1 and it cross-checked against what we intended to file. Caught a transcription error by the filing office.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
honestly this whole UCC 1-308 thing sounds like sovereign citizen nonsense to me. ive never seen it work in real life
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•You're not wrong. There's a whole subculture of people who think they can magic their way out of debts with UCC incantations.
0 coins
Layla Mendes
•My cousin got mixed up with that crowd. Spent thousands on 'courses' about how to use UCC filings to create money out of thin air. Total scam.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
I actually looked into this extensively when I had a similar situation. UCC 1-308 basically codifies the doctrine of 'performance under protest' from common law. It means you can fulfill your obligations under a contract while still preserving your right to challenge the contract later. But it doesn't affect the validity of security interests or UCC filings. Your lien is safe as long as you filed correctly.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•That's reassuring. So when we file our continuation next year, we don't need to do anything special because of their 1-308 claims?
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
•Nope, just file your UCC-3 continuation statement normally. Their contract challenges are a separate issue from your lien perfection.
0 coins
Aria Park
•Just make sure you don't miss that continuation deadline. I've seen more liens lost to missed deadlines than to debtor challenges.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
•True story - we actually started using Certana.ai to track our continuation deadlines too. You can upload your UCC-1 and it calculates the exact continuation date and sends reminders.
0 coins
Noah Ali
Bottom line: if your UCC-1 is filed correctly and your security agreement is valid, their UCC 1-308 posturing is just theater. Focus on keeping your filings current and let them waste their time on irrelevant legal theories.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful. I feel much better about our position now.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Good luck with it. And definitely document all their communications in case you need to show a pattern of harassment later.
0 coins
Josef Tearle
I've dealt with this exact scenario multiple times in my practice. The key point everyone's making is correct - UCC 1-308 is about contract performance under reservation of rights, not about UCC filing validity. What I usually tell clients is to treat this as two separate issues: (1) your security interest and lien perfection, which stands or falls based on your UCC filings and security agreement, and (2) any contract disputes the debtor wants to raise. The debtor can invoke 1-308 all they want, but it won't invalidate a properly perfected security interest. I'd recommend having your attorney send them a brief response explaining that their 1-308 reservation doesn't affect your lien position, just to create a clear record. Then focus on making sure your continuation filing is timely and accurate.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
•This is exactly the approach I'd recommend too. Having that clear written record from your attorney will be valuable if this escalates later. It also shows you're taking their concerns seriously while maintaining your legal position. One thing I'd add is to make sure you're documenting the timeline of all their UCC 1-308 communications - if they're trying to claim they reserved rights from the beginning, you want to be able to show when these objections actually started relative to when they accepted the financing.
0 coins