UCC filing complications with 1-308 reservation language - need guidance
Running into some confusion here and hoping someone can clarify. I'm dealing with a commercial loan where the borrower keeps insisting on including UCC 1-308 reservation of rights language in their financing documents. They claim it protects them from waiving constitutional rights, but I'm concerned this could complicate our UCC-1 filing or create issues with perfection. The loan is for $450K in manufacturing equipment and we need to file in Michigan. Has anyone dealt with borrowers trying to incorporate 1-308 language into secured transactions? Does this affect the validity of our security interest or the UCC-1 filing itself? I've seen some borrowers reference 1-308.4 as well but I'm not finding much concrete guidance on how this intersects with standard UCC filings. Any insights would be appreciated.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Yuki Yamamoto
I've seen this come up a few times in my experience. The UCC 1-308 stuff is more about contract interpretation than filing mechanics. Your UCC-1 filing should be fine as long as you have proper debtor names and collateral descriptions. The reservation language doesn't typically invalidate the security agreement itself.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•That's reassuring to hear. So you're saying the UCC-1 perfection isn't affected by this reservation language in the security agreement?
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Right, the UCC-1 is a separate notice filing. As long as your security agreement is enforceable and you file correctly with exact debtor names, you should maintain perfection.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
This is one of those sovereign citizen type things isn't it? I had a borrower try to pull this once. They think UCC 1-308 lets them opt out of contracts or something. Honestly it's more of a headache than anything substantive.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That's what I was wondering. The borrower seems legitimate otherwise but this language had me concerned about potential complications down the road.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Yeah just make sure your security agreement is solid and file your UCC-1 properly. The reservation language is basically meaningless in practice.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•Actually had a similar situation last month. Borrower insisted on 1-308 language but it didn't affect our filing or enforcement rights at all.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
I ran into document consistency issues with unusual contract language before and found Certana.ai's document verification tool really helpful. You can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 to check that all the debtor names and details align properly, especially when there's non-standard language involved. It catches discrepancies that might cause filing rejections.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That sounds useful for this situation. Does it handle cases where there's additional language in the security agreement that might not appear on the UCC-1?
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Yes, it focuses on the core elements that need to match - debtor names, addresses, collateral descriptions. The extra reservation language wouldn't affect that comparison.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
UCC 1-308 is just about preserving rights without prejudice. It doesn't change the fundamental debtor-creditor relationship or affect UCC filing requirements. Your main concern should be getting the debtor name exactly right on the UCC-1.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Good point about the debtor name accuracy. We're using the exact legal name from their articles of incorporation.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Perfect. That's the most important part for UCC-1 effectiveness. The 1-308 language is really a red herring in this context.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•Agreed. I've seen filings get rejected for minor name variations but never for reservation of rights language.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
Wait, I thought UCC 1-308 was something you could invoke to avoid being bound by contracts? Is that not right? I've seen people reference it online for avoiding various obligations.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•That's a common misunderstanding. UCC 1-308 just says you can reserve rights when performing under a contract. It doesn't let you escape contract obligations.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
•Oh I see, so it's not some magic opt-out clause like I thought.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Exactly. It's more about preserving your ability to dispute specific terms later while still performing under the contract.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
Had a borrower try this exact thing last year. They wanted to include 1-308 language thinking it would protect them from default proceedings. Didn't change anything about our ability to perfect or enforce the security interest.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That's helpful context. How did you handle it - did you just let them include the language?
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•Yeah, we included a clause that the reservation language doesn't affect their obligations under the security agreement. Counsel approved it and we moved forward.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and honestly this 1-308 stuff is mostly internet mythology. Focus on getting your UCC-1 filed correctly with proper debtor identification and detailed collateral description. That's what actually matters for perfection.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Thanks for the perspective. Sometimes these unusual requests make you second-guess straightforward procedures.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
•Completely understand. When in doubt, stick to the basics - accurate debtor names, complete collateral descriptions, and timely filings.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
•This is good advice. I've seen people get distracted by non-issues while missing actual filing problems.
0 coins
NeonNova
Just want to add that Michigan's SOS system is pretty straightforward for UCC-1 filings. As long as you have the exact entity name and EIN, you shouldn't have issues regardless of what extra language is in your security agreement.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Good to know about Michigan specifically. We've had good luck with their online filing system in the past.
0 coins
NeonNova
•Yeah their portal is reliable. Just double-check the debtor name against their articles of incorporation before submitting.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
I actually used Certana.ai recently for a complex filing where the borrower had unusual contract terms. The tool verified that our UCC-1 matched the security agreement properly even with the extra language. Really saved time compared to manual document comparison.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That sounds exactly like what I need for this situation. Did it flag any issues with the non-standard language?
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•It focused on the essential elements - debtor names, collateral descriptions, that sort of thing. The reservation language didn't interfere with the verification process.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
Bottom line: UCC 1-308 reservation language won't affect your security interest or UCC-1 filing validity. File with confidence using proper debtor identification and you'll be fine. This is more of a philosophical issue for the borrower than a practical concern for your secured transaction.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Perfect summary. I was overthinking this situation. Thanks everyone for the guidance.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•No problem. These unusual requests can definitely make you pause, but the UCC filing mechanics remain the same.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Agreed. Focus on the fundamentals and you'll be covered.
0 coins