< Back to UCC Document Community

Mohamed Anderson

Texas Secretary of State UCC Search Issues - Need Help Finding Records

Hey everyone, I'm having trouble with the Texas Secretary of State UCC search system and wondering if anyone else has run into similar problems. I'm trying to locate some UCC-1 filings from 2023 for a due diligence project, but the search results keep coming back incomplete or showing different information than what I expected. The debtor names I'm searching for should definitely have active liens, but some searches return nothing while others show partial matches that don't seem right. Has anyone figured out the best way to navigate their search interface? I've tried both exact name matches and variations but getting inconsistent results. This is holding up a critical transaction review and I'm starting to worry I'm missing something important in my search methodology.

Ellie Perry

•

The Texas SOS UCC search can be really finicky with debtor names. Are you searching with the exact legal entity name as it appears on the original filing? Even small variations like Inc vs Incorporated or missing commas can cause searches to fail completely. Also make sure you're checking both individual and organization search options.

0 coins

I thought I was using the exact names but now I'm second-guessing myself. The entity names are pretty long with multiple words and I might have gotten the punctuation wrong. Is there a way to see how the names are actually formatted in their system?

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Unfortunately Texas doesn't show you the exact format until you find the record. Try searching with just the first few words of the company name, then browse through results to see the actual formatting they use.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

I've dealt with this exact issue! The Texas portal has some quirks with business entity searches. Sometimes UCC-1 filings get indexed differently than you'd expect, especially if there were amendments or continuation filings involved. Have you tried searching by filing number if you have those available?

0 coins

I don't have the filing numbers unfortunately, that's part of what I'm trying to find. The client only gave me the debtor names and approximate filing dates.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

That makes it tougher. Try searching with partial names and broader date ranges. Sometimes the filing dates in their system don't match when the documents were actually submitted.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

Also check if any of these entities might have had name changes or mergers since 2023. That could explain why your searches aren't pulling up what you expect.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for UCC searches and document verification. You can upload the debtor information or any related documents you have, and it helps cross-reference and verify the filings across different formats and name variations. Really helped me catch inconsistencies I was missing when doing manual searches through the SOS portal.

0 coins

Interesting, I haven't heard of that tool. Does it work specifically with Texas filings or is it more general?

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

It works with UCC filings nationwide. You just upload whatever documents you have and it does the cross-checking automatically. Saved me tons of time on due diligence projects like yours.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

I've been hearing about these automated verification tools. Do they actually access the state databases directly or just help organize your manual searches?

0 coins

ughhh the texas portal is THE WORST. I spent 3 hours last week trying to find continuation filings that I KNEW existed because I filed them myself. The search function is completely broken and their customer service is useless. Sometimes I wonder if they even want people to find these records.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

I feel your pain! Have you tried calling their UCC division directly? Sometimes they can help locate filings over the phone if you have enough identifying information.

0 coins

Called them twice last month and got two different answers about the same filing. Not exactly confidence-inspiring lol

0 coins

Make sure you're checking the advanced search options. Texas allows you to search by secured party name too, which might help if you know who the lenders are. Also their system sometimes has a delay in indexing new filings, so if these are recent there might be a processing lag.

0 coins

Good point about the secured party search. I do know some of the lender names so I'll try that approach. These filings should be from 2023 though so processing delays shouldn't be an issue.

0 coins

2023 should definitely be fully indexed by now. The secured party search might reveal filings that aren't showing up in debtor name searches due to formatting issues.

0 coins

This is smart advice. I've found secured party searches sometimes return results that debtor searches miss, especially when there are subsidiaries or complex corporate structures involved.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

Are you sure these are UCC-1 filings and not fixture filings or some other type? Texas handles different secured transaction types in different systems sometimes. If the collateral includes real estate fixtures that might explain why your searches aren't working.

0 coins

They should be regular UCC-1 filings for equipment financing, no real estate involved. But I hadn't considered they might have been filed as fixture filings by mistake.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

Equipment financing should definitely be in the main UCC system. But if someone filed incorrectly it could end up in the wrong place. Worth checking the real estate records too just in case.

0 coins

Have you tried searching with just the first word of the company name? Sometimes the Texas system truncates long entity names in weird ways. I've had luck finding records by searching super broadly then filtering through results manually.

0 coins

That's a good suggestion. Some of these entity names are really long so truncation could definitely be an issue. I'll try the broad search approach.

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

This works but be prepared to scroll through a lot of results. Texas has tons of UCC filings so broad searches can return hundreds of matches.

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

Last month I had a similar issue and discovered that Certana.ai's document verification tool could help identify discrepancies between what I thought I was searching for and what was actually filed. Turned out there were some debtor name variations I hadn't considered. Just upload any documents you have and it cross-checks everything automatically.

0 coins

That sounds really helpful for catching the variations I might be missing. Is it easy to use for someone not super technical?

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

Super easy - just upload PDFs and it does the verification automatically. Much faster than trying to manually check every possible name variation.

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

Check if any of these entities filed under a DBA or assumed name. Texas businesses sometimes use different names for UCC filings than their legal entity name, especially if they operate under trade names.

0 coins

I hadn't thought about DBA names. These are larger corporations so I assumed they'd file under their legal entity names, but you're right that they might use operating names instead.

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

Even big companies sometimes file under subsidiary names or division names. It's worth checking the Texas business entity database to see what names they have registered.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

This is really common in Texas. I've seen Fortune 500 companies file UCCs under local subsidiary names that don't obviously connect to the parent company.

0 coins

The timing of your searches might matter too. I've noticed the Texas SOS system sometimes goes down for maintenance during business hours without warning. Try searching at different times of day to see if you get more consistent results.

0 coins

Interesting point. I have been searching mostly during normal business hours. I'll try some evening or weekend searches to see if that makes a difference.

0 coins

Yeah their system definitely has performance issues during peak hours. Early morning or late evening searches often work better.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Just went through this exact same nightmare last week! Turns out I was making the search too complicated. Started with the most basic version of each company name and worked my way up to the full legal name. Found several filings I had missed with the detailed searches.

0 coins

That's a great systematic approach. I think I was jumping straight to the full legal names without trying the simpler versions first.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Exactly! The Texas system seems to work better with simple searches. You can always verify the full details once you find the actual records.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

This is where tools like Certana.ai really help - they automatically try different name variations so you don't have to do all that manual work.

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

I've run into this exact issue with Texas UCC searches! One thing that really helped me was using wildcard searches when the system allows it. Also, double-check that you're not accidentally searching in the wrong date range - the Texas portal defaults to a pretty narrow window sometimes. Another trick is to search by the first few letters of the entity name with asterisks, which can catch variations in how the entity type is abbreviated (LLC vs L.L.C. vs Limited Liability Company, etc.). If you're still having trouble, consider reaching out to a local Texas attorney who does a lot of UCC work - they often have tricks for navigating the state's quirky search interface that aren't obvious to occasional users.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today