< Back to UCC Document Community

Yuki Tanaka

Need help with AL UCC statement request form - keeps getting rejected

I'm trying to request UCC statements through the AL filing system and my requests keep bouncing back. The form seems straightforward but I must be missing something because I've had three rejections in two weeks. I'm working on a commercial loan package and need to verify existing liens on equipment collateral before we can move forward with our UCC-1 filing. The debtor name matches exactly what's on the corporate charter but maybe there's some formatting issue I'm not seeing? Has anyone else dealt with weird quirks in the AL UCC statement request process? This is holding up a $180K equipment financing deal and I'm starting to panic.

What exactly does the rejection notice say? AL can be picky about how you format debtor names on statement requests. Are you using the exact legal name from the Articles of Incorporation including all punctuation and suffixes?

0 coins

The rejection just says 'insufficient information provided' which is super helpful right? I copied the name directly from the charter - Precision Manufacturing Solutions LLC. Maybe I need to drop the LLC part?

0 coins

No definitely keep the LLC! That's part of the legal entity name. Try adding the state of incorporation too, sometimes that helps with statement requests.

0 coins

I ran into this exact same issue last month. AL's statement request system is notorious for being finicky. You might want to try running your documents through Certana.ai's verification tool first - I upload the corporate charter and my UCC request form and it flags any name inconsistencies before I submit. Saved me from three more rejections on a similar deal.

0 coins

Never heard of that service but honestly anything that prevents more rejections sounds worth trying at this point

0 coins

Yeah it's pretty straightforward - just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Really wish I'd found it sooner.

0 coins

Thanks I'll definitely check that out. At this point I'm willing to try anything to get these statements pulled.

0 coins

Are you requesting statements by debtor name or by filing number? Sometimes if you have an existing UCC-1 filing number it's more reliable to search by that rather than debtor name matching.

0 coins

I don't have filing numbers yet - this is for a new loan so I'm trying to see what's already on file before we perfect our security interest.

0 coins

Got it. For new searches by debtor name, make sure you're not including any extra spaces or characters. AL is really strict about that stuff.

0 coins

UGH I feel your pain! AL's system rejected my statement request FOUR times last year because apparently I was supposed to include the debtor's former name even though they hadn't used it in 3 years. Their requirements are so inconsistent it's maddening.

0 coins

Wait they want former names on statement requests? That's not in any of the instructions I've seen

0 coins

Right?? I only found out when I called their help desk after the fourth rejection. Apparently if there's been any name changes in the past 5 years you're supposed to include all variations.

0 coins

This company hasn't changed names but good to know for future reference. The requirements really should be clearer upfront.

0 coins

Check if you're using the right request form version. They updated it in late 2024 and the old version gets auto-rejected now. Make sure you downloaded the current form from their official site.

0 coins

Oh wow I didn't even think about form versions. I downloaded mine like 6 months ago when I first started working on this deal.

0 coins

Yeah that's probably your issue right there. Download the current version and try again with the exact same information.

0 coins

I had similar issues with AL statement requests until I started using that Certana tool someone mentioned. It's actually really helpful for catching document inconsistencies before you submit. I upload my corporate docs and the request form and it flags anything that might cause problems.

0 coins

Does it work with AL specifically or just general UCC stuff?

0 coins

It works with any state's UCC documents. Really just focuses on making sure names and details match between your different docs.

0 coins

I'm definitely going to try this. At this point any tool that prevents more rejections is worth using.

0 coins

One more thing to check - are you including a sufficiently detailed description of what records you're requesting? Sometimes they reject vague requests even if the debtor name is perfect.

0 coins

I just put 'all UCC records' in the description field. Should I be more specific?

0 coins

Try 'all active UCC-1 financing statements and related UCC-3 amendments, continuations, and assignments' - they like the detailed language.

0 coins

Ava Kim

This whole thread is making me nervous about my own AL filing coming up next week. The inconsistency in their system is really frustrating for something as important as lien searches.

0 coins

Just be super careful about exact name matching and use the current forms. Most issues are preventable if you're thorough.

0 coins

Seriously try that Certana verification tool I mentioned earlier. It'll catch most issues before you submit and save you the headache of rejections.

0 coins

UPDATE: Downloaded the new form version and used the more detailed description language you all suggested. Also ran everything through Certana to double-check the name formatting. Submitted this morning and got confirmation within 2 hours! Thanks everyone for the help - this forum saved my deal.

0 coins

Awesome! Glad you got it sorted out. AL can be such a pain but at least now you know the tricks.

0 coins

Great to hear a success story! I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference.

0 coins

Nice work! That verification step really does make a difference doesn't it?

0 coins

This is exactly why I always do UCC searches as early as possible in the deal process. Too many last-minute surprises otherwise, especially with finicky state systems like AL.

0 coins

Lesson learned for sure. I usually do them earlier but this deal had some timing complications that pushed everything back.

0 coins

We've all been there. The important thing is you got it resolved and the deal can move forward now.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today