< Back to UCC Document Community

Paolo Rizzo

Need Help Understanding Account UCC Definition for Equipment Loan Filing

Been going back and forth with our lender's compliance team about this account UCC definition issue and honestly getting nowhere fast. We're setting up a UCC-1 for some heavy machinery financing (around $185K worth of excavators and compactors) but there's confusion about how to properly describe the collateral when it involves equipment purchase accounts. The equipment dealer set up financing accounts for each piece of machinery, and now our attorney is saying the UCC filing needs to reference these accounts specifically in the collateral description. Problem is, I'm not even sure what constitutes an 'account' under UCC definitions when we're talking about equipment that's already been delivered and is sitting on our job sites. Lender wants the filing done by end of this week but their legal team keeps sending back different versions of what should be included. One version just says 'all equipment' while another gets into specific account numbers and payment streams. The SBA is also involved since it's partially guaranteed, which adds another layer of complexity. Anyone dealt with account UCC definition issues on equipment deals? Really need to get this right because if the collateral description is wrong, the whole security interest could be worthless.

Amina Sy

•

Account definitions in UCC filings can be tricky, especially with equipment purchases. Under UCC Article 9, an 'account' typically refers to payment obligations - so if you have financing accounts set up for each piece of equipment, those payment streams could be considered accounts for UCC purposes. The physical equipment itself would be 'equipment' or 'goods' in the collateral description.

0 coins

This exactly. Had a similar situation last year with fleet vehicles. The financing accounts and the actual equipment are separate types of collateral that need different treatment in the UCC-1.

0 coins

Wait, so if the equipment is already delivered, why are we even talking about accounts? Shouldn't it just be equipment collateral at this point?

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Your lender's legal team sounds confused tbh. Equipment that's been delivered and is sitting on job sites = goods/equipment collateral. The financing accounts would only be relevant if you're also pledging the payment obligations as additional security. Are they trying to get both the equipment AND the account receivables?

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

That's what I'm trying to figure out! The equipment is definitely ours now, but there are ongoing payment obligations to the dealer that might be what they're calling 'accounts.

0 coins

Javier Garcia

•

Sounds like they want a blanket lien on everything - the equipment plus any related payment streams. Pretty common for SBA deals.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

Had this exact headache on a construction equipment deal last month. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to cross-check our UCC-1 against the loan agreements and dealer contracts. Uploaded all the PDFs and it caught that we were mixing up account definitions with equipment descriptions. Saved us from filing something that wouldn't have properly secured the lender's interest.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

How does that work exactly? We've got like 8 different documents from the dealer, lender, and SBA.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

You just upload all the PDFs and it automatically checks for consistency between documents. Flags any mismatches in debtor names, collateral descriptions, that kind of thing. Really straightforward.

0 coins

Never heard of automated document checking for UCC stuff. Interesting concept though.

0 coins

OK let me break this down because I see this confusion all the time. Under UCC 9-102, an 'account' is a right to payment for property sold, leased, licensed, assigned, or otherwise disposed of. If your dealer sold you equipment and you owe them money, that payment obligation could be an account from the dealer's perspective. But from YOUR perspective as the debtor, you're probably not creating accounts - you're just buying equipment.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

So the equipment itself should just be described as equipment in the UCC-1? The payment obligations aren't really 'accounts' that we're pledging?

0 coins

Correct. Unless you're specifically pledging future receivables or payment rights as additional collateral, the equipment is equipment. Period.

0 coins

This makes sense. I think OP's lender is overcomplicating things.

0 coins

CosmosCaptain

•

Why is everyone making this so complicated??? Equipment = equipment. Accounts = money someone owes you. If you bought excavators, put excavators in the collateral description. Done.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

It's not that simple when SBA guarantees are involved. They often require broader collateral descriptions.

0 coins

CosmosCaptain

•

Still doesn't change what an account actually IS under the UCC though.

0 coins

Been filing UCCs for 15 years and this account definition question comes up constantly. The key is understanding whose perspective we're talking about. Your dealer might have accounts receivable from your purchase, but YOU as the equipment buyer aren't creating accounts by buying equipment. You're creating a debt obligation, but the equipment itself remains equipment for UCC purposes.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

This helps clarify things. So our UCC-1 should focus on describing the actual equipment, not the financing structure?

0 coins

Exactly. Describe what you own that can serve as collateral. The equipment. Let the loan docs handle the payment obligations.

0 coins

Omar Fawzi

•

Makes perfect sense when you put it that way.

0 coins

Chloe Wilson

•

Had a similar mess with our SBA equipment loan. Lender kept going back and forth on collateral descriptions. Finally got smart and used one of those document verification services - think it was Certana.ai or something similar. Uploaded our loan agreement, equipment invoices, and draft UCC-1. System flagged that we had inconsistent collateral descriptions between documents. Turned out the lender was trying to secure both equipment and accounts that didn't actually exist in our deal.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

That sounds exactly like our situation. How long did the verification take?

0 coins

Chloe Wilson

•

Pretty much instant. Just drag and drop the PDFs and it shows you any inconsistencies. Really saved our butts on that deal.

0 coins

I'm still confused about when equipment becomes an account. Like if I sell the excavator later, does that create an account? Or is it only an account if I'm leasing it out for payments?

0 coins

If you sell equipment and the buyer owes you money, THEN you have an account receivable. But while you own the equipment, it's just equipment.

0 coins

Ohhhh that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Right, it's all about timing and who owes what to whom.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

Your attorney should know this stuff. Account UCC definition is pretty basic - it's a payment right, not physical property. If they're mixing up collateral types, might want to find someone who actually does secured transactions regularly.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Yeah, starting to think our attorney isn't as experienced with UCC filings as we thought.

0 coins

Happens more than you'd think. General practice attorneys sometimes get in over their heads on secured transaction work.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - sometimes lenders want to perfect security interests in both the equipment AND any future accounts you might generate from using that equipment. Like if you're a contractor, they might want rights to your future receivables from jobs done with the equipment. But that would be clearly spelled out in the loan agreement.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

That could be it. We do generate receivables from construction jobs using this equipment.

0 coins

Check your loan docs carefully. If they want future receivables, it should be explicitly stated and properly described in the UCC-1.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

Good point. Future-generated accounts are different from the equipment purchase accounts they were originally discussing.

0 coins

StellarSurfer

•

Bottom line: get your documents consistent before filing. I learned this the hard way when a UCC-1 got rejected because the collateral description didn't match what was actually in our security agreement. Now I always double-check everything matches up. There are tools that can help with this kind of verification if you don't want to do it manually.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Definitely learned our lesson about document consistency. Going to triple-check everything before we submit.

0 coins

StellarSurfer

•

Smart move. Better to spend extra time upfront than deal with rejected filings later.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

UPDATE: Finally got this sorted out. Turns out the lender did want both the equipment AND our accounts receivable from jobs using the equipment. The 'account UCC definition' confusion was because they were using sloppy terminology. Equipment stays equipment, future receivables are accounts. Two separate types of collateral, both properly described now in the UCC-1. Thanks everyone for the help working through this!

0 coins

Glad you got it figured out! That's a pretty common structure for construction equipment loans.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

Nice resolution. Proper collateral descriptions make all the difference in these filings.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

Good outcome. Always important to get the terminology right in secured transactions.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today