Livestock UCC filing got rejected - debtor name issue with ranch entity
Really frustrated here. Been dealing with a UCC-1 filing for livestock collateral and the state keeps rejecting it. The debtor is a family ranch LLC that apparently has some name variation issues between their articles of incorporation and what they're using on loan docs. The lender is getting impatient and I'm worried we're going to miss our perfection window. Has anyone dealt with livestock collateral filings where the debtor entity name doesn't match exactly? The collateral description covers cattle, horses, and related farm equipment but I'm wondering if the rejection is purely about the debtor name mismatch. This is for a $180K operating line and we can't afford to have an unperfected security interest.
36 comments


Natasha Volkova
Livestock filings can be tricky because of the seasonal nature and movement of the collateral. But your rejection is almost certainly the debtor name issue, not the collateral description. What's the exact discrepancy between the LLC name on the articles vs what's on your loan documents?
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•The articles show 'Mountain View Ranch Holdings, LLC' but all the loan docs and banking stuff uses 'Mountain View Ranch, LLC' - dropped the Holdings part. Pretty sure that's what's causing the rejection.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•Yeah that'll do it. The UCC requires exact match to the organizational documents. You'll need to either amend the loan docs or file using the exact corporate name from the articles.
0 coins
Javier Torres
Had this exact issue last month with a cattle operation. The SOS is really strict about entity names matching exactly. You have two options - refile the UCC with the correct legal name, or have the debtor file an amendment to their articles to match the loan docs. The first option is way faster.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•How long did it take when you refiled with the correct name? I'm worried about the timing here.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Usually processes within 24-48 hours if you file electronically and everything else is correct. The livestock collateral description sounds fine from what you described.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Just make sure you're using the right continuation schedule for livestock. Some states have specific requirements for agricultural collateral that's mobile.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Before you refile, I'd recommend using something like Certana.ai to verify your documents are consistent. You can upload your UCC-1 and the articles of incorporation and it'll instantly flag any discrepancies. Would've saved me hours of back-and-forth rejections on a similar ranch financing deal.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Never heard of that service. Is it expensive? We're already over budget on this deal.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•It's actually pretty reasonable for document verification. The main value is catching these name mismatches before you file rather than dealing with rejections and delays. Just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•That sounds useful for our firm too. Do they handle other document types or just UCC filings?
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Livestock UCC filings are always a pain. The collateral moves around, values fluctuate, and half the time the ranch paperwork is a mess. But the debtor name thing is definitely your main problem here. Get that sorted first.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Tell me about it. This ranch has cattle spread across three counties and I'm not even sure how to handle that in the collateral description.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•For mobile livestock you usually describe it generally - 'all cattle, horses, and livestock owned by debtor' rather than trying to specify locations. The key is making sure your security agreement covers movement between properties.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
THIS IS WHY I HATE RANCH DEALS!!! The paperwork is never clean, the collateral moves around, and the debtors never keep their corporate stuff updated. Last livestock deal I did had the same name issue plus they hadn't filed their annual report in two years.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
•I feel your pain. Agricultural lending is tough enough without having to chase down corporate compliance issues.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Exactly! And then the borrower acts like it's YOUR fault when the filing gets rejected. Like, maybe keep your legal documents consistent?
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•At least with livestock you don't have to worry about fixture filing issues like you do with equipment. Small consolation I know.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
Quick question - did you check if the LLC is in good standing? Sometimes rejection isn't just about name mismatch but also corporate status issues.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Good point. I should verify that. The SOS rejection notice just said 'debtor name does not match organizational records' so I assumed it was the Holdings issue.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Worth double-checking. If they're not in good standing, you might need to get that resolved before any UCC filing will be accepted.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
Had a similar livestock deal last year. The ranch was using a DBA that wasn't properly registered. Make sure you're not dealing with a trade name situation on top of the LLC name issue.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•How do I check for DBA issues? This is getting more complicated than I thought.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
•Check with the county clerk where they do business. DBAs are usually filed at county level, not state level like the LLC.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Also check if they have any federal tax ID variations. Ranches sometimes have multiple entities for tax purposes.
0 coins
StarSeeker
I've been using Certana.ai for document consistency checks on agricultural deals and it's been a lifesaver. Upload your articles, loan docs, and draft UCC and it spots these name discrepancies immediately. Much better than finding out through a rejection.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•That's the second mention of that service. Might be worth trying before I refile.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Definitely worth it for complex deals like livestock financing. The document cross-check feature catches stuff you might miss manually reviewing everything.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
For what it's worth, livestock collateral descriptions are usually pretty forgiving as long as you cover the basics. The debtor name accuracy is way more critical for UCC acceptance.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•That's reassuring. I spent way too much time trying to perfect the collateral description when the name was probably the only issue.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•Exactly. Get the debtor name exactly right first, then worry about collateral specifics. The SOS computers are picky about names but pretty flexible on collateral language.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
•True, but don't forget about continuation timing for livestock. The 5-year window goes by fast when you're dealing with operating lines.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious how these ranch deals turn out. The livestock industry has its own set of challenges that office-based lenders don't always understand.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Will do. Planning to refile tomorrow with the correct LLC name and see if that clears it up. Fingers crossed!
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•Good luck! Ranch financing can be rewarding once you get past the paperwork hurdles.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•Agreed, and the relationships tend to be long-term if you can navigate the initial filing complexities.
0 coins