Article 9 Texas UCC filing got rejected twice - debtor name issues
Need some urgent help here. We're trying to perfect a security interest on equipment for a construction company in Dallas and our UCC-1 filing keeps getting rejected by the Texas SOS. This is our second rejection and I'm starting to panic because we've got loan docs that need to close next week. The debtor is an LLC and we used the exact name from their Articles of Organization, but Texas keeps saying there's a mismatch. Has anyone dealt with Texas Article 9 UCC requirements recently? The collateral description covers heavy machinery and construction equipment. We followed the standard UCC procedures but something isn't right with how Texas processes these filings. Any advice on what Texas specifically looks for in debtor names for Article 9 secured transactions?
35 comments
Join the conversation
Isabella Oliveira
Texas can be really picky about LLC names in UCC filings. Did you include the full legal suffix? Sometimes they want 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out instead of just 'LLC'. Also check if there are any punctuation marks or abbreviations in the Articles that you might have missed.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•We used 'LLC' but you're right, maybe they want it spelled out. The Articles show 'ABC Construction, LLC' but we might need to try 'ABC Construction Limited Liability Company'.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•I've seen this exact issue in Texas. They're super strict about matching the Secretary of State records exactly. Even a missing comma can cause rejection.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
What error code did you get with the rejection? Texas usually gives specific rejection codes that tell you exactly what's wrong. Article 9 filings in Texas are pretty straightforward once you know their quirks, but the debtor name has to be perfect.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•The rejection just says 'debtor name does not match records' but doesn't give specifics. Really frustrating when you're trying to close a deal.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•Check the Texas Comptroller's database too, not just SOS. Sometimes LLCs are registered in different places and you need the name from wherever they're actually filed.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•This happened to me last month. I ended up using Certana.ai to cross-check all the documents. You just upload the Articles of Organization and your UCC-1 draft, and it instantly shows you exactly where the name discrepancies are. Saved me from a third rejection.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
Texas Article 9 requirements are no joke. I've been doing UCC filings there for 15 years and they've gotten pickier over time. Make sure you're pulling the debtor name from the most recent version of their organizational documents. Sometimes companies amend their Articles and the name changes slightly.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•This is so true! We had a client that added 'Enterprises' to their name in an amendment but we were still using the old version. Two rejections later we figured it out.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Good point about amendments. I'll double check if they've filed any recent changes with the Secretary of State.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
UGH Texas UCC system is the WORST. I swear they reject filings just to make our lives miserable. Last time it took me FOUR attempts to get a simple continuation through. The online portal is garbage and their customer service is useless.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•I feel your pain. But once you figure out their system it's not too bad. Just gotta be super precise with everything.
0 coins
StarStrider
•At least Texas processes rejections quickly. Some states take weeks to tell you there's a problem.
0 coins
Zara Malik
Here's what usually works for Texas UCC-1 filings: 1) Get the EXACT name from the Texas SOS entity search, 2) Include all punctuation marks exactly as shown, 3) Don't abbreviate anything unless it's abbreviated in the official records. For LLCs make sure you're using the right suffix format.
0 coins
Luca Marino
•This is solid advice. I always do a fresh entity search right before filing to make sure nothing has changed.
0 coins
Nia Davis
•What about if the LLC is registered in another state but doing business in Texas? Do you use the home state name or the Texas assumed name?
0 coins
Zara Malik
•For out-of-state LLCs you typically use the exact name from their home state registration, but if they have a Texas assumed name certificate you might need that instead. Article 9 can be tricky on this point.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
I had similar issues last year with a Texas UCC filing. Turned out the company had a d/b/a name that was throwing everything off. Are you sure your debtor doesn't have any assumed names or trade names registered that might be confusing the system?
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•That's a good thought. They do business under a shorter name but I thought we should use the legal entity name for the UCC-1.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•You're right to use the legal entity name. But sometimes companies get confused and give you their DBA instead of their actual legal name.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
Try the Certana document checker tool if you haven't already. I was skeptical at first but it really does catch name mismatches instantly. You upload your Articles and UCC draft and it highlights exactly what doesn't match. Beats going through multiple rejections.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Second this recommendation. Used it for a complicated filing with multiple debtors and it caught three small discrepancies I would have missed.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Is that one of those paid services? I'm always hesitant to pay for something when I feel like I should be able to figure it out myself.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•I thought the same thing but honestly the time saved is worth it. Plus avoiding rejection fees and deadline stress.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
Another Texas Article 9 gotcha - make sure your collateral description is specific enough. Texas sometimes rejects filings if they think the collateral description is too vague, even if it would be fine in other states.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Really? I thought 'all equipment' was pretty standard for UCC-1 filings.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•It usually is, but Texas can be picky. Better to be more specific like 'construction equipment and machinery' or list major categories.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Quick update - ran the documents through Certana's verification tool and found the issue! The LLC name in the Articles has a period after 'Construction' that we missed. 'ABC Construction., LLC' not 'ABC Construction, LLC'. Such a tiny thing but apparently enough to cause rejection.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Wow, a single period caused all that trouble? Texas really is particular about exact matches.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•This is exactly why I always triple-check punctuation. Those little details will kill you in UCC filings.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Thanks everyone for the help! Re-filing now with the corrected name. Hopefully third time's the charm.
0 coins
Mei Liu
Glad you got it sorted out! Texas Article 9 UCC system definitely keeps us on our toes. For anyone reading this later - always verify debtor names character by character against the official state records.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
•Great advice. I'm going to bookmark this thread for future reference.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•Yeah this whole discussion is really helpful. The period issue is something I never would have thought to check for.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I had no idea that something as small as a missing period could cause rejections. It sounds like Texas really requires character-by-character precision. Question for the group - are there other states that are similarly strict about debtor name matching, or is Texas uniquely challenging? I want to make sure I'm prepared when I start handling Article 9 filings in different jurisdictions.
0 coins