


Ask the community...
Final thought - document your classification reasoning in your credit file. If questions come up later during audits or workout situations, you'll want to show you considered the Article 9 distinctions carefully.
Clay, I've handled dozens of these tech collateral classifications and here's what I've learned - the key is understanding the economic substance, not just the legal form. Your Oracle licenses are clearly general intangibles, but for the Salesforce reseller agreements, look at whether you're securing the right to use the software OR the right to receive payments from sublicensing. The former is general intangibles, the latter could be accounts receivable. For the custom CRM they license to clients, those licensing agreements generate payment streams, so they're definitely general intangibles (the right to receive those payments). I'd go with: "all general intangibles including but not limited to software licenses, licensing agreements, intellectual property rights, customer contracts, and all proceeds thereof; and all equipment including computer hardware, servers, and related tangible personal property." Keep it broad but specific enough to show you understand what you're securing. The Friday deadline is tight but doable - just don't overthink the gray areas.
This is exactly the kind of detailed analysis I needed! The distinction between securing the right to use vs. the right to receive payments is really helpful - I hadn't thought about it that way. Your suggested collateral description language strikes the right balance between comprehensive and specific. Really appreciate you breaking down each type of asset. Going to use this framework to finalize our UCC-1 today.
One more thing - make sure you keep the filing confirmation and receipt from Wyoming SOS. You'll want proof that the continuation was filed timely in case there are ever any questions about the perfection of your security interest.
And consider getting a certified copy of the filed continuation from the Secretary of State for your permanent records.
Certified copies are always a good idea for important filings like this. Worth the small extra fee for the peace of mind.
Just went through a similar panic with a Texas UCC filing last year. One thing I learned is to also double-check if there have been any amendments to your original filing since 2020 - if there were any UCC-3 amendments filed, make sure your continuation references the most current version. Also, since you mentioned this is equipment financing, verify that the collateral description in your loan documents still matches what's on file. Equipment gets moved, sold, or replaced over 4+ years and you want to make sure your security interest covers what you actually have. Good luck with the filing!
That's a really important point about checking for amendments! I didn't even think about that possibility. I'll need to do a thorough search on the Wyoming SOS system to see if there were any UCC-3 amendments filed since the original 2020 filing. And you're absolutely right about verifying the equipment - some of our machinery has been upgraded or relocated since then. Better to catch any discrepancies now before filing the continuation. Thanks for the heads up!
Update us when you get this filed! I'm curious how it goes since I have a couple fixture filings coming up for continuation next year. Always helpful to hear how the process actually works in practice.
Will do. I'm planning to file the continuation in the next couple weeks so I'll report back on how smooth the Ohio SOS portal is.
Yeah please update. Ohio's system has been pretty reliable in my experience but it's good to hear current user reports.
Carter, I've been following this thread and it sounds like you've got good advice here. Just wanted to add that I always recommend doing a quick search of the current UCC records before filing the continuation to make sure there haven't been any unauthorized filings or changes to your original record. It's rare, but I've seen cases where clerical errors at the filing office or identity mix-ups created problems that weren't discovered until someone tried to continue a filing. Takes 5 minutes to search Ohio SOS records online and could save you headaches down the road. Also, keep detailed records of when you file the continuation - not just the filing receipt but screenshots of the confirmation page. You never know when you might need to prove exactly when something was submitted.
That's excellent advice Emma. I hadn't thought about doing a current search before filing the continuation. With all the system changes and potential for clerical errors, it makes total sense to verify the original filing is still showing up correctly in the database. I'll definitely do that search first and take screenshots of everything when I file. Thanks for the practical tips - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance I was hoping to get from this community.
Emma's advice about doing a pre-filing search is spot on. I learned this the hard way when I found a data entry error had corrupted our original filing record - the debtor name had an extra space that wasn't visible in the original confirmation but showed up in the database. Caught it just before filing a continuation and had to do a corrective amendment first. Now I always verify the current record matches my files exactly before doing any UCC-3 work. Also seconding the screenshot advice - I keep a folder with timestamped screenshots for every UCC filing I do.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation on a smaller scale ($450K manufacturing equipment lease). One thing I'd add is to make sure your attorney clearly defines which type of tender applies in each section of your documents. I had mine create a simple chart showing: 1) Equipment delivery tender (Article 2) - what the seller must do, 2) Purchase payment tender (Article 2) - what I must do to seller, 3) Financing payment tender (Article 9) - regular payments to lender, and 4) Default cure tender (Article 9) - what I must do if in default. Having it laid out visually really helped me understand the different obligations and timing requirements. For the UCC-1 filing itself, focus on the basics - accurate debtor name, precise equipment description with serial numbers if available, and proper filing jurisdiction. The tender stuff is important for understanding your ongoing obligations but shouldn't complicate the actual filing process.
McKenzie, that chart idea is brilliant! I'm definitely going to ask my attorney to create something similar for my deal. It would really help visualize all the different tender obligations and keep them straight. Your breakdown of the four types makes it so much clearer - I was getting confused because I kept seeing "tender" everywhere but couldn't figure out which rules applied when. Thanks for sharing that approach!
This chart approach is exactly what I needed! As someone new to secured transactions, I was getting lost in all the different tender contexts. Breaking it down into those four categories - delivery, purchase payment, financing payment, and default cure - makes so much more sense than trying to figure out which UCC article applies to each situation. I'm going to steal this idea and have my attorney create a similar breakdown for my $2.8M deal. It would definitely help me track all the moving parts and make sure I understand my obligations at each stage. Thanks for the practical solution!
As someone who's been through multiple secured transaction deals, I can't emphasize enough how important it is to get clarity on tender definitions upfront. What helped me was creating a master document that cross-references every use of "tender" in all my transaction documents with the specific UCC section it relates to. For your $2.8M equipment deal, I'd suggest having your attorney prepare a tender obligations summary that covers: when tender is required, what form it must take (cash, wire, certified funds), any notice requirements, and cure periods if applicable. The UCC-1 filing itself is straightforward - just focus on accurate debtor information and detailed equipment descriptions. But understanding your tender obligations could save you from costly mistakes down the road, especially if you ever need to cure a default or exercise any rights under the security agreement.
AstroAce
I use Certana.ai now for all my UCC document prep. You upload your corporate docs and draft UCC-1 and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies or formatting issues. Would have saved you those two rejections and the stress. The document checker is really thorough.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Yeah it covers PA's requirements. It actually caught a name issue for me on a PA filing that I would have missed otherwise.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•I might have to try that. At this point I'll take any help I can get to avoid another rejection.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
I'm dealing with something similar right now in PA and it's incredibly frustrating. One thing that helped me was requesting a certified copy of the entity's current filing status from the Department of State - it shows exactly how they have the name formatted in their system. It costs about $25 but might be worth it to avoid another rejection on a $2.8M deal. Also, I've noticed PA sometimes wants the state of incorporation included even when it's not required on the form. Have you tried adding that to see if it makes a difference?
0 coins