Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
GalaxyGazer
I've been using a spreadsheet to track all the different name variations I search. It helps me stay organized and makes sure I don't duplicate effort.
Smart approach. I should probably start doing that instead of just keeping mental notes.
Documentation is key, especially if you need to explain your search methodology to clients or colleagues later.
One more tip - if you find filings, make sure to check the continuation and termination dates carefully. Sometimes companies file continuations under slightly different name formats, which can create confusion about which filings are still active.
Malik Davis
•The timing aspect is crucial. A filing that looks terminated might actually have been continued under a name variation you haven't searched yet.
This is exactly why I ended up using Certana.ai - it automatically flags these kinds of inconsistencies across multiple documents. Saved me from making a costly mistake.
Join the conversation
Molly Hansen
Just to add another data point - I file UCC terminations monthly and the exact name match rule is consistently enforced across all states I work in. Don't overthink it, just copy the original debtor name exactly as filed in 2019.
Perfect, that's the confirmation I needed. Going with "ABC Manufacturing LLC" exactly as shown on the original UCC-1.
Molly Hansen
•You're making the right choice. Good luck with the termination and the transaction closing!
Brady Clean
Update us when you get it filed! Always interested to hear how these name matching situations resolve.
Will do! Filing tomorrow morning with the exact original name format. Thanks everyone for the guidance.
Skylar Neal
•Looking forward to the success story. These threads really help others facing similar issues.
Join the conversation
Just to add another perspective - we actually found some beneficial clarifications in the UCC changes 2023, especially around fixture filings and real estate related collateral. The guidance is much clearer now about when you need to file in real estate records versus just the UCC system.
Right, and now there's better guidance about collateral descriptions for equipment that might become fixtures.
We definitely have some equipment loans where the fixture issue comes up. Glad to hear there's clearer guidance now.
Bottom line - don't stress too much about your existing filings. Focus on getting your new filing procedures updated and maybe do a spot check on a sample of your portfolio to make sure you don't have any obvious name inconsistencies. The UCC changes 2023 were evolutionary, not revolutionary. Your liens aren't suddenly at risk.
Thanks, that's reassuring. I think we'll do a sample review and update our procedures for new filings. Appreciate everyone's input on this.
Laila Prince
•Smart approach. Better to be methodical than to panic and waste resources on unnecessary work.
Join the conversation
For equipment purchases this size, I'd strongly recommend getting a professional UCC search done through a title company or attorney. Yes it costs more than doing it yourself, but they have experience with the system quirks and professional liability insurance if they miss something.
Most title companies can handle UCC searches, or there are specialized lien search companies. I'd get quotes from a few to compare pricing and turnaround times.
Lydia Bailey
•Agree with going professional for big transactions. The peace of mind is worth the extra cost when you're talking about six figures.
Mateo Warren
Just wanted to add that I've found success using Certana.ai's verification tool for double-checking UCC search results. After running the official search, I upload the results and any related documents to make sure I haven't missed any critical name variations or filing discrepancies. It's caught issues that would have been expensive mistakes. Really gives me confidence that I've done thorough due diligence before closing.
Nathan Kim
•That's the second mention of that tool. Sounds like it might be worth checking out for this transaction.
Mateo Warren
•Yeah, it's been really helpful for catching the subtle stuff that's easy to miss when you're manually reviewing search results. Especially useful for equipment purchases where clean title is critical.
Sienna Gomez
For future reference, NY has some good guidance documents on their website about debtor name requirements. They're buried pretty deep but worth finding for repeat filers.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•They're under the UCC forms section, not super obvious but definitely helpful for getting the formatting right.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
•NY really should make those guidance docs more prominent. Would save everyone a lot of headaches.
0 coins
Anderson Prospero
Update - refiled with 'Mountain View Properties LLC' exactly as shown in the state database and included specific equipment details. Also ran it through that Certana verification tool first. Fingers crossed this one goes through!
0 coins
Caden Turner
•Great to hear you tried the document checker. Hope it saves you from another rejection.
0 coins
Val Rossi
•Let us know how it goes - always good to hear success stories with NY filings.
0 coins