Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Sienna Gomez
For future reference, NY has some good guidance documents on their website about debtor name requirements. They're buried pretty deep but worth finding for repeat filers.
Sienna Gomez
•They're under the UCC forms section, not super obvious but definitely helpful for getting the formatting right.
Rudy Cenizo
•NY really should make those guidance docs more prominent. Would save everyone a lot of headaches.
Update - refiled with 'Mountain View Properties LLC' exactly as shown in the state database and included specific equipment details. Also ran it through that Certana verification tool first. Fingers crossed this one goes through!
Caden Turner
•Great to hear you tried the document checker. Hope it saves you from another rejection.
Val Rossi
•Let us know how it goes - always good to hear success stories with NY filings.
Join the conversation
GalaxyGazer
I've been using a spreadsheet to track all the different name variations I search. It helps me stay organized and makes sure I don't duplicate effort.
Smart approach. I should probably start doing that instead of just keeping mental notes.
Documentation is key, especially if you need to explain your search methodology to clients or colleagues later.
One more tip - if you find filings, make sure to check the continuation and termination dates carefully. Sometimes companies file continuations under slightly different name formats, which can create confusion about which filings are still active.
Malik Davis
•The timing aspect is crucial. A filing that looks terminated might actually have been continued under a name variation you haven't searched yet.
This is exactly why I ended up using Certana.ai - it automatically flags these kinds of inconsistencies across multiple documents. Saved me from making a costly mistake.
Join the conversation
Molly Hansen
Just to add another data point - I file UCC terminations monthly and the exact name match rule is consistently enforced across all states I work in. Don't overthink it, just copy the original debtor name exactly as filed in 2019.
Perfect, that's the confirmation I needed. Going with "ABC Manufacturing LLC" exactly as shown on the original UCC-1.
Molly Hansen
•You're making the right choice. Good luck with the termination and the transaction closing!
Brady Clean
Update us when you get it filed! Always interested to hear how these name matching situations resolve.
Will do! Filing tomorrow morning with the exact original name format. Thanks everyone for the guidance.
Skylar Neal
•Looking forward to the success story. These threads really help others facing similar issues.
Join the conversation
Just to add another perspective - we actually found some beneficial clarifications in the UCC changes 2023, especially around fixture filings and real estate related collateral. The guidance is much clearer now about when you need to file in real estate records versus just the UCC system.
Right, and now there's better guidance about collateral descriptions for equipment that might become fixtures.
We definitely have some equipment loans where the fixture issue comes up. Glad to hear there's clearer guidance now.
Bottom line - don't stress too much about your existing filings. Focus on getting your new filing procedures updated and maybe do a spot check on a sample of your portfolio to make sure you don't have any obvious name inconsistencies. The UCC changes 2023 were evolutionary, not revolutionary. Your liens aren't suddenly at risk.
Thanks, that's reassuring. I think we'll do a sample review and update our procedures for new filings. Appreciate everyone's input on this.
Laila Prince
•Smart approach. Better to be methodical than to panic and waste resources on unnecessary work.
Dylan Campbell
I actually used Certana.ai recently for a complex filing where the borrower had unusual contract terms. The tool verified that our UCC-1 matched the security agreement properly even with the extra language. Really saved time compared to manual document comparison.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That sounds exactly like what I need for this situation. Did it flag any issues with the non-standard language?
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•It focused on the essential elements - debtor names, collateral descriptions, that sort of thing. The reservation language didn't interfere with the verification process.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
Bottom line: UCC 1-308 reservation language won't affect your security interest or UCC-1 filing validity. File with confidence using proper debtor identification and you'll be fine. This is more of a philosophical issue for the borrower than a practical concern for your secured transaction.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•No problem. These unusual requests can definitely make you pause, but the UCC filing mechanics remain the same.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Agreed. Focus on the fundamentals and you'll be covered.
0 coins