UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emma Garcia

Collateral description in security agreement causing UCC filing headaches

Our law firm represents a client who's dealing with a nightmare scenario. They have a security agreement from 2019 that describes collateral as 'all equipment, fixtures, and inventory now owned or hereafter acquired.' Pretty standard language, right? Well, the debtor is now claiming that certain high-value CNC machines purchased in 2023 aren't covered because they were 'specialized manufacturing equipment' not 'general equipment.' The original UCC-1 filing mirrors the security agreement language exactly, but now we're wondering if we should have been more specific. The debtor is trying to sell these machines to pay other creditors, and we're scrambling to figure out if our lien position is solid. Has anyone dealt with courts interpreting broad collateral descriptions like this? The security agreement value is around $2.8 million, so this isn't a small issue. Should we file a UCC-3 amendment to add more specific language, or would that suggest our original filing was defective?

Natalie Adams

•

This whole thread reminds me why I hate dealing with UCC filings. You think you did everything right, then someone comes along and tries to poke holes in perfectly reasonable language. At least with real estate, you have a specific property description.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

Personal property is definitely trickier than real estate. Everything moves around and changes.

0 coins

Natalie Adams

•

Exactly. And then you have to worry about whether you described it right, whether it's still in the same location, whether the debtor sold it...

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

For what it's worth, I've never seen a court rule that CNC machines aren't equipment. They're clearly business equipment used in manufacturing. The debtor's argument sounds pretty weak to me. I think you're in good shape with your current filing.

0 coins

Maybe the debtor is arguing they're fixtures? But even that doesn't make sense for moveable machinery.

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

CNC machines are definitely not fixtures. They're portable equipment, even if they're bolted down for safety.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

UCC filing deadlines with Iowa Secretary of State - need guidance on continuation timing

Running into some confusion with UCC continuation requirements and wondering if anyone has recent experience with Iowa filings. We have several UCC-1s that are approaching their 5-year mark and I'm trying to nail down the exact timing requirements. The Iowa Secretary of State website mentions filing within 6 months before expiration but I've heard conflicting advice about whether it's better to file early or wait closer to the deadline. One lender told me they always file exactly 4 months before expiration as their standard practice, while another said they wait until the final month to avoid any potential complications. I'm particularly concerned about getting the debtor names exactly right since we've had issues in the past with slight variations causing rejections. Has anyone dealt with Iowa SOS recently on UCC continuations? Any tips on their specific requirements or common rejection reasons would be really helpful.

For what it's worth, Iowa's customer service is pretty helpful if you call with questions. I've had good luck reaching someone knowledgeable when I wasn't sure about specific requirements.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Good to know! Do you have a direct number or just use the main SOS line?

0 coins

I use the main number but ask specifically for UCC filing assistance. They usually transfer you to someone who actually knows the system.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the advice! Sounds like the consensus is to file 2-4 months before expiration and triple-check all the debtor information matches exactly. I'm definitely going to look into that document verification tool a couple people mentioned - seems like it could save a lot of headaches.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Definitely. The peace of mind is worth the extra verification step.

0 coins

Yuki Nakamura

•

Let us know how it goes! Always good to hear about real experiences with Iowa filings.

0 coins

Emily Jackson

UCC 9-511 requirements driving me crazy - debtor name on amendment

Been wrestling with UCC 9-511 compliance for our amendment filings and honestly getting nowhere fast. We're trying to file a UCC-3 amendment to add collateral but keep running into debtor name issues that seem tied to the 9-511 requirements. Our original UCC-1 was filed with the debtor as 'ABC Manufacturing Corp' but now the entity has restructured and operates as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' - same EIN, same principals, just different entity type. The SOS portal keeps rejecting our UCC-3 because of name mismatch but I'm not clear on whether 9-511 allows us to use the current legal name or if we're stuck with the original filing name. Has anyone dealt with this specific 9-511 scenario where the debtor entity type changed post-filing? Do we need to terminate the original and start fresh or is there a proper amendment path that satisfies 9-511 requirements?

Aria Park

•

Just had to deal with a similar 9-511 issue last week. The key is remembering that amendments reference the original filing, so all identifying information needs to match exactly. Delaware's particularly strict about this, but once you get the format right, future amendments are much easier.

0 coins

Emily Jackson

•

Good to know Delaware's consistent about their requirements, even if they're strict.

0 coins

Aria Park

•

Yeah, strict but predictable. Once you know their preferences, it's actually easier than states that are inconsistent.

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

Thanks everyone - this thread has been super helpful. Going to file the UCC-3 with the original corp name to stay 9-511 compliant and note the entity conversion in additional info. Will definitely check out that document verification tool too since I'm clearly missing things in my manual reviews.

0 coins

Smart approach. The verification tool will catch stuff like this automatically so you don't have to worry about 9-511 compliance issues in the future.

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

Sounds like a solid plan. Good luck with the filing!

0 coins

Connor O'Brien

Maryland UCC forms causing debtor name rejections - need help with proper format

I'm pulling my hair out trying to get these maryland ucc forms filed correctly. We've had three UCC-1 filings rejected in the past two weeks because of debtor name formatting issues. The Maryland SOS portal keeps kicking back our submissions with generic error messages that don't specify what's wrong with the names. Our lending department is getting frustrated because we can't perfect these security interests until the filings go through. Has anyone else dealt with Maryland's specific requirements for debtor names on UCC forms? The business names include LLC designations and I'm wondering if that's causing the problem. We're using the standard UCC-1 form but maybe Maryland has quirks I'm missing. These are all equipment financing deals so time is critical.

One more suggestion - try the Certana document checker to compare your UCC-1 against the business charter documents. It catches name discrepancies that cause these rejections and you'll know for sure before resubmitting. I use it for all my Maryland filings now after getting burned too many times.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

It's pretty straightforward - just upload both documents and it shows you exactly where the names don't match. Saves a lot of guesswork.

0 coins

Luca Ricci

•

Better than going through another rejection cycle and losing more time on these deals.

0 coins

Update us when you figure out what was causing the rejections! Always helpful to know what specific issues other people run into with Maryland UCC forms.

0 coins

Will do. Going to pull all the charter documents and compare character by character. Hopefully that solves it.

0 coins

Good luck! Maryland can be tricky but once you get the format right, subsequent filings usually go through smoothly.

0 coins

Luca Romano

UCC 9-311 Exception Questions - Equipment Lease Filing Confusion

I'm working on a complex equipment lease deal where we're financing some specialized manufacturing equipment, and I keep running into questions about UCC 9-311 exceptions. The equipment includes some items that might fall under federal certification requirements, but I'm not 100% sure if we need to file a standard UCC-1 or if there are special rules that apply. The debtor is telling us that some of this equipment is subject to federal registration, which would mean we can't perfect through normal UCC filing. Has anyone dealt with 9-311 exception situations before? I'm trying to figure out what documentation I need to verify whether our collateral falls under the federal exemptions or if we proceed with regular state UCC-1 filing. This is a $2.8 million deal so I really can't afford to mess up the perfection.

Luca Romano

•

Thanks everyone for the input. Sounds like I was overthinking this - manufacturing equipment with FDA compliance requirements doesn't typically fall under federal perfection schemes. I'll proceed with standard UCC-1 filing but maybe run it through that Certana tool first for peace of mind.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

Good plan. For a $2.8M deal, the extra verification step is worth it.

0 coins

You're making the right call. 9-311 exceptions are narrow, and manufacturing equipment rarely qualifies.

0 coins

I just want to add that if you do find any equipment that might fall under federal exemptions, make sure you understand the federal filing requirements completely. Some federal systems have different continuation and termination procedures than state UCC.

0 coins

They vary by system, but they're definitely different. Federal aircraft liens have completely different rules than UCC continuations.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

That's why most lenders prefer UCC-eligible collateral when possible - the procedures are standardized across states.

0 coins

Prev1...241242243244245...684Next