Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Kai Santiago
Bottom line - you've got time to fix this properly. Don't rush and make mistakes. Get your documents in order, make sure the debtor name issue is resolved, then file your continuation. The 60-day window you mentioned gives you plenty of time to do it right.
Lim Wong
•Good luck! Post an update when you get it sorted out. Always helpful to hear how these situations get resolved.
Dananyl Lear
•Yeah, these UCC threads are super helpful for learning about the real-world filing issues that come up.
I handle UCC filings regularly and want to emphasize something important - in Tennessee, you absolutely need to get the debtor name exactly right. The Secretary of State's system is very strict about name matching. Since you mentioned going from "ABC Equipment LLC" to "ABC Equipment Holdings LLC", that's definitely going to require an amendment before you can file the continuation. I'd recommend calling the Tennessee SOS UCC division directly at (615) 741-2286 - they're usually pretty helpful about explaining the specific requirements for name changes. Also, keep in mind that once you file the amendment to correct the debtor name, wait for it to be processed and approved before filing your continuation. Don't try to do them simultaneously or you might end up with both getting rejected.
Join the conversation
The real issue is that most APIs don't understand the nuances of UCC debtor naming requirements. They treat it like a simple database search when it's actually much more complex legally.
Jenna Sloan
•That's why I always tell people to never rely 100% on automated UCC searches for anything important.
This thread has been really helpful. Sounds like we need a hybrid approach with better verification tools.
One thing to check - make sure your API is searching all the right jurisdictions. We found out our previous service wasn't checking fixture filings in certain states, which caused us to miss some equipment liens.
We hadn't thought about fixture filings specifically. I'll need to verify our API covers those properly.
Also check if it's searching both central filing and local filing offices where required.
Join the conversation
Taylor To
I was skeptical when someone mentioned Certana.ai earlier, but I actually tried their UCC verification tool last month after my own filing got rejected for a debtor name mismatch. The automated comparison between documents is actually pretty thorough - it caught issues I would have missed manually reviewing everything. Worth using before you submit the new UCC-1 to avoid any technical rejections that would cause more delays.
Ella Cofer
•Does it work with electronic filings or just paper documents?
Taylor To
•Works with PDFs so it handles both. Most state systems give you PDF copies of electronic filings anyway.
Kevin Bell
UPDATE: Got the UCC search results back and fortunately no other liens were filed during my lapse period. Filed the new UCC-1 this morning and it was accepted. Still angry about losing the 2020 priority date but at least we're perfected again. Thanks everyone for the advice - especially the suggestion to verify all documents before filing. Caught two small errors that could have caused a rejection.
Kevin Bell
•One was a middle initial included in the new filing that wasn't in the original. The other was slightly different formatting in the collateral description. Small stuff but enough to potentially cause rejection.
Excellent news! Those kinds of small formatting differences are exactly what trip people up during urgent re-filings. The document verification tools are really becoming essential for avoiding costly delays. Hope you're also pursuing the malpractice claim against your previous counsel - that should cover any additional costs from the priority loss.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to add something that saved us significant time and potential legal issues - before you even start drafting the subordination agreement, run a comprehensive UCC search in your state to see if there are any other liens or encumbrances on your equipment or inventory that you might not be aware of. We discovered an old mechanic's lien from equipment repairs that was still on file, which could have complicated our subordination if we hadn't caught it early. Also, consider whether your insurance policies need to be updated to reflect the new lien priority structure - some lenders require specific loss payee language that corresponds to their lien position. Finally, if you're dealing with specialized equipment, make sure both lenders understand exactly what they're getting security interests in. Our equipment lender initially balked when they realized some of our "manufacturing equipment" was actually leased rather than owned, which required additional documentation to clarify what collateral was actually available for the subordination.
This is such valuable advice - the comprehensive UCC search point is something that could really save people from nasty surprises down the road. I hadn't thought about the insurance policy implications either, but that makes total sense since lenders often have specific requirements about loss payee clauses that need to match their security interest priority. The point about leased versus owned equipment is particularly important for manufacturing companies where it's common to have a mix of owned and leased machinery. That distinction could definitely complicate the subordination if not addressed upfront. Thanks for sharing these insights - they really highlight how many moving parts are involved in what seems like it should be a straightforward priority adjustment!
Really appreciate all the detailed advice in this thread! I'm going through a similar subordination situation right now and this has been incredibly helpful. One thing I'd add based on my experience so far - make sure to get clarity from both lenders about their preferred subordination agreement format BEFORE you start drafting anything. Our equipment lender had very specific language requirements that weren't compatible with our inventory lender's standard template, which caused delays while the lawyers worked out acceptable compromise language. Also, if you're working with an SBA lender like some folks mentioned, they often have additional documentation requirements beyond the standard UCC-3 filing that other lenders might not be familiar with. Getting everyone on the same page about documentation requirements upfront can save weeks of back-and-forth revisions.
Zara Ahmed
•Great point about getting format preferences upfront! I'm just starting this process myself and wondering - when you say "specific language requirements," are we talking about legal terminology differences or more about the structure of how the subordination is described? Also, did you find that having the lawyers involved from the beginning actually sped things up compared to trying to work out the language differences yourselves first? I'm trying to decide whether to engage our attorney right away or attempt the initial draft ourselves.
Felicity Bud
•@c4105ca4b227 I'm dealing with this exact situation right now! When you mention "specific language requirements," I'm curious if that was more about legal terminology or structural differences in how the subordination was described? Our equipment lender keeps talking about "intercreditor provisions" while our existing lender just wants a simple priority adjustment - feels like they're speaking different languages. Also wondering if having lawyers draft everything from scratch ended up being more cost-effective than trying to merge incompatible templates. I'm torn between engaging our attorney upfront versus attempting the initial negotiations ourselves to save on legal fees.
Sean Murphy
Welcome to all the new community members! This thread really highlights how common it is to inherit UCC filing responsibilities without proper training or documentation. I've been managing secured transactions for about 8 years now and still learned a few things from this discussion. One additional tip I'd add - consider creating a simple tracking template that includes not just the basic filing info, but also the loan officer or relationship manager associated with each filing. When questions come up or you need clarification on collateral descriptions, having that contact info readily available can save you hours of detective work. Also, don't be afraid to reach out to the Secretary of State offices directly - most have UCC divisions with staff who can help explain state-specific requirements or walk you through search procedures if you're missing filing information. The learning curve is steep but you'll get the hang of it!
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•This is such great advice, Sean! As someone who just joined this community and is currently drowning in inherited UCC filings, the idea of including loan officer contacts in the tracking template is brilliant - I've already spent way too much time trying to figure out which equipment corresponds to which filing. I'm also relieved to hear that reaching out to the Secretary of State offices is an option. I was worried about bothering them with basic questions, but it sounds like they're actually helpful resources. This whole thread has been a masterclass in UCC management that I never got in my actual job training. Really appreciate everyone sharing their hard-won knowledge!
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
As a newcomer to this community, I can't thank everyone enough for this incredibly detailed discussion! I just started handling UCC filings at my company and honestly had no idea about the complexity involved with lapse dates and continuations. Reading through all these experiences - from Natasha's $500K equipment loan nightmare to Oliver's success with document verification tools - has been both educational and terrifying. I'm definitely going to implement the spreadsheet tracking system with early reminders, and I love the suggestion about including loan officer contacts. The fact that you only have a 6-month window to file continuations and missing it can affect your priority position as a secured creditor really drives home how critical proper tracking is. I'm also planning to reach out to our Secretary of State office to make sure I understand our state's specific requirements. This thread has probably saved me from making some costly mistakes down the road. Looking forward to being an active member of this community as I navigate the world of secured transactions!
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
•Welcome to the community, Jasmine! Your reaction is exactly what I had when I first discovered this world of UCC complexities. The good news is that once you get your tracking system set up, it becomes much more manageable. I'd suggest starting with just one or two filings to get comfortable with the process before tackling your entire portfolio. Also, when you do reach out to your Secretary of State office, ask if they have any online resources or guides specific to continuation filings - many states have helpful FAQs that can clarify those state-specific nuances Omar mentioned. You're already ahead of the game by learning about this proactively rather than scrambling when a lapse date is looming!
0 coins