< Back to Social Security Administration

Delaying Social Security to 70 - monthly increase calculator to decide optimal filing month?

I've been planning to wait until 70 to start my Social Security retirement benefits (for the maximum amount), but I'm starting to question this strategy. My family has incredible longevity genes (my grandmother just celebrated her 101st birthday), which was my main reason for delaying. But now I'm feeling like I might be leaving money on the table by waiting. When I check my benefits estimate on the SSA website, it shows my benefit amount at different ages, but doesn't give me the monthly increases between age 69-70 to help me decide the optimal month to start. Does anyone know if there's a calculator that shows the month-by-month increase during that final year? I'm trying to make a more informed decision about exactly which month would be my sweet spot. I don't have many financial complications - I receive about $1,250 monthly from a taxable IRA annuity and $3,800 monthly from a non-taxable pension plan. I'm financially stable without SS for now, but starting to rethink my maximize-at-all-costs approach.

The SSA's online calculators don't show month-by-month increases, but the math is straightforward. After FRA, you earn Delayed Retirement Credits of 2/3 of 1% per month, which equals 8% per year. So if your age 67 (FRA) benefit is $3,000, each month you delay gives you about $20 more per month for life. The Social Security website has a Retirement Estimator that gives you amounts at different ages, but for month-by-month, you can just calculate it yourself using that 2/3 of 1% rule. Just take your FRA benefit and add the appropriate percentage based on how many months you've delayed.

0 coins

Thank you! That's exactly what I needed to know. So it's a consistent 2/3 of 1% increase each month after FRA until age 70. That makes the calculation much easier. I can now figure out exactly what each additional month of waiting will add to my lifetime benefit.

0 coins

I was in your EXACT situation last year!!! My mom lived to 97 so I was dead set on waiting til 70. Then I did the break even calculatons and realized I'd have to live to almost 83 just to break even on the money I was giving up by not claiming at 67!! I ended up filing at 68 and 4 months cause that felt right for me. But honestly now I wish I had just started at 67. That's 16 months of benefits (about $42,000 total) that I'll never see again! Dont overthink it like I did. The peace of mind from having that SS money coming in is worth something too.

0 coins

This is why one-size-fits-all advice about Social Security is so problematic. Everyone's situation is different. The break-even calculations are important, but so is considering your current financial needs, other income sources, and personal risk tolerance.

0 coins

There's actually a great calculator at OpenSocialSecurity.com that helps optimize when to file. It's free and lets you enter your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) to find your optimal claiming strategy. One thing to consider: while the monthly increase is important, you should also look at the bigger picture. Each year you delay filing after FRA increases your benefit by 8%, which is a guaranteed return you can't find anywhere else. But you also need to consider how many months of foregone benefits you're giving up. There's actually a mathematical "break-even point" where the higher monthly benefit from delaying begins to outweigh the total benefits you would have received by filing earlier. For most people, this break-even point is around age 80-82. Given your family longevity, delaying might still be your best option.

0 coins

opensocialsecurity is good but it kept crashing when i tried to use it last month. maybe just my computer tho

0 coins

have you tryed calling SSA and asking them? they should be able to tell you the exact amounts for each month

0 coins

Good luck with that! I've been trying to get through to someone at Social Security for weeks about my wife's spousal benefits. Always get the "we are experiencing high call volume" message and then they hang up on me. The local office is booked 3 months out for appointments. I finally used this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) after a friend recommended it. They got me connected to an SSA agent in about 15 minutes when I'd been trying for days. They have a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. The agent was able to give me exact numbers for each month of delayed retirement credits, which was super helpful for our decision.

0 coins

I'm a financial planner who specializes in retirement income strategies, and I see this question frequently. While the 8% per year (or 2/3% per month) delayed retirement credit is valuable, it's important to understand that this is only one factor in a complex decision. Consider: 1. Your current cash flow needs 2. Tax implications (especially RMDs from your IRA at age 72) 3. Survivor benefits if you're married 4. Health status and family longevity 5. Other income sources One approach I've seen work well: If you're financially secure without SS, but concerned about "leaving money on the table," consider filing at 69 instead of 70. You'll still get 16% more than your FRA amount (vs. 24% at age 70), but reduce your foregone benefits by a year.

0 coins

This is excellent advice, thank you. I hadn't considered the tax implications with RMDs. I'm not married so survivor benefits aren't a factor, but the cash flow perspective is helpful. I think I might split the difference and aim for 69 instead of waiting the full extra year to 70.

0 coins

my dad waited til 70 and passed away at 72... all that waiting for nothing...

0 coins

This is EXACTLY what I worry about!! Sorry about your dad. This is why I couldn't wait the full time. We just never know.

0 coins

Dont forget that once you file for SS you get medicare too. thats important!

0 coins

That's not correct. Medicare eligibility begins at age 65 regardless of when you file for Social Security benefits. You can (and should) enroll in Medicare at 65 even if you're delaying your SS benefits until later. They're completely separate enrollment processes.

0 coins

Is anyone else annoyed that the SS website doesn't make this easier????! They have millions of dollars for their website but can't add a simple calculator that shows month by month increases??? It's like they WANT to make things confusing for us!

0 coins

the whole system is designed to be complicated so people mess up and get less money 🤷‍♂️

0 coins

One more thing to consider: If you start your benefits now instead of waiting until 70, you'll receive approximately 36 months of payments (assuming you're around 67 now) that you'd otherwise miss out on. That's a significant amount of money that could be invested or used to enhance your quality of life now. With your family longevity, you'll likely surpass the break-even point. But remember that money received earlier has more utility value and investment potential than the same amount received later. The optimal strategy often lies somewhere in between the extremes. Perhaps starting at 68 or 69 gives you a reasonable compromise between maximizing your monthly benefit and not leaving too much money on the table.

0 coins

This is an excellent point about the time value of money. Even with longevity in the family, there's significant value in having those funds available earlier, especially if they can be invested or used to avoid withdrawing from other retirement accounts that could continue growing tax-deferred.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
7,064 users helped today