< Back to Social Security Administration

Skylar Neal

Can I now get widows benefits with WEP/GPO changes if I receive teacher's pension (TRS)?

I retired from teaching after 27 years and receive my pension through the Teachers Retirement System (TRS). My husband passed away in 2000 when he was only 49 years old. He worked construction and paid into Social Security his entire adult life. When I applied for widow's benefits back in 2021, I was told I couldn't receive anything because my teacher's pension was $237 above what was allowed under the Government Pension Offset (GPO) rule. I've been hearing about this new Social Security bill that changes how WEP/GPO works for people like me. Does anyone know if this would help my situation? Would I now qualify for at least some portion of my late husband's Social Security benefits? I'd appreciate any insights from people who understand these complicated rules.

You might be in luck! The Social Security Fairness Act that's been discussed would eliminate or modify the GPO (Government Pension Offset) that's been preventing you from collecting widow's benefits. When it's fully implemented, you should be eligible to receive some portion of your husband's Social Security benefits regardless of your teacher's pension amount. I'd recommend calling SSA directly to discuss your specific situation once the changes are officially implemented. It's still working its way through the system, but there's definitely hope for your situation.

0 coins

Thank you for the hope! Do you know when these changes will actually take effect? I've been waiting over 20 years and every extra month matters at this point.

0 coins

The changes to WEP/GPO are being phased in gradually, and how much you'll benefit depends on your specific situation. The formula is changing so that instead of losing most or all benefits, you'll likely receive a more fair proportion based on your actual work history. Since you mentioned your pension was just barely above the threshold before, you have a good chance of qualifying for at least partial widow's benefits. Here's what you should do: 1) Request a benefit calculation from SSA specifically asking how the new rules affect your case 2) Bring documentation of both your TRS pension amount and your husband's Social Security earnings record 3) Ask specifically about retroactive benefits (though these may be limited

0 coins

My mom was in almost this EXACT same boat!!! Teacher for 30 yrs, dad died young, got nothing from his SS. Such a ripoff after he paid in his whole life!!!

0 coins

I've been fighting this stupid GPO rule for 15 YEARS!!!! It's absolutely CRIMINAL how they treat teachers, firefighters, and other public servants who paid into different systems. My husband worked 45 years paying into Social Security and I get ZERO of his benefits because I taught children for 30 years. The whole system is broken and even if they change it now, it's TOO LATE for many of us who have been struggling for years. Don't hold your breath waiting for these changes - they've been promising reform for decades.

0 coins

I'm sorry you've been struggling with this too. It really does feel unfair after our spouses paid into the system their whole lives. Have you contacted your congressional representatives about your situation?

0 coins

my aunt had this same problem but she got around it by working at walmart for 10 years after retiring from teaching. she earned enough quarters to qualify for her own ss benefit which was small but then she could get more of her late husbands benefit too. might be too late for you to do this tho, not sure how old you are

0 coins

That's not quite how it works. Working at Walmart wouldn't help with the GPO reduction on widow's benefits. The GPO reduces spouse/widow benefits by 2/3 of your non-covered pension regardless of whether you qualify for your own SS benefit. What helps is if you have substantial earnings under Social Security yourself, which can reduce the impact of WEP (a different provision).

0 coins

I've helped several retired teachers navigate this exact situation. The Social Security Fairness Act proposes complete elimination of both WEP and GPO, but what's likely to pass is a modified version with phased implementation. Based on your situation (being just slightly above the threshold), you'll likely qualify for partial widow's benefits once the changes take effect. Unfortunately, getting accurate information from SSA about this can be frustratingly difficult. Their phone lines are constantly jammed, and you might wait hours only to get disconnected. I've had clients use a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) to get through to SSA quickly. They have a helpful video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU showing how it works. It's been a game-changer for people needing to discuss complex situations like WEP/GPO changes with actual SSA representatives.

0 coins

Thank you for the detailed information. You're right about the difficulty reaching SSA - I've tried calling multiple times and either couldn't get through or was on hold forever. I'll check out that service you mentioned to see if it helps me connect with someone who can give me accurate information about my specific case.

0 coins

my mom went thru this & was told she could only get like $37 a month from my dads ss even tho he worked 40+ years in construction!!! totally unfair system that punishes teachers!!

0 coins

It is frustrating! The 2/3 offset from GPO often leaves people with very small benefits or nothing at all. The good news is that the proposed changes should help people in this situation receive more of their spouse's earned benefits.

0 coins

I researched this extensively for my own situation (retired state employee with pension). The current proposal would phase out the GPO over 5 years, reducing the offset by 20% each year. So if this passes, you would initially get 20% more than current rules allow, then 40% more the following year, and so on until the offset is eliminated. Based on your numbers, if your teacher pension exceeded the threshold by only $237, you would likely qualify for benefits in the first year of implementation. However, I recommend waiting until the legislation actually passes before getting too excited - we've seen similar proposals die in Congress many times before.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about not counting on this until it's actually signed into law. There have been so many false starts with WEP/GPO reform over the years. The phased implementation is the most likely scenario though, based on the current legislative text.

0 coins

did u work any jobs that paid into ss during your career? even part time summer jobs count and might help your case

0 coins

I did work at a retail store during summers early in my teaching career, but it wasn't enough quarters to qualify for my own benefit. The SSA representative said those earnings wouldn't help with the GPO problem.

0 coins

CALL YOUR SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES NOW!!! This bill needs public pressure to pass. I've been calling mine weekly reminding them how many retired teachers, police, and firefighters are in their district who vote regularly! The only way this passes is if they feel pressure from constituents.

0 coins

YES!!! My mom has been writing letters every month! The more people who contact congress the better chance we have!!

0 coins

One important update: if the legislation passes in its current form, there could be some retroactive adjustments, but likely limited to 12 months maximum. So while you won't recoup benefits from the full 20+ years since your husband passed, you might receive a lump sum payment covering the retroactive period once you're approved. Also, when you do contact SSA, make sure you're specifically asking about widow's benefits (RIB-LIM) rather than spousal benefits, as the calculations and eligibility criteria are different.

0 coins

Thank you for mentioning the RIB-LIM specifically. I wasn't aware there was a technical term I should be using. This is all so complicated to navigate, I appreciate all the help.

0 coins

I finally got through to SSA last week after trying for days. If you need to speak with them directly about your specific case, try calling right when they open at 8:00 AM Eastern time. I've found Monday and Tuesday are slightly better than later in the week. Be prepared with your husband's SSN, death certificate information, and the exact amount of your current TRS pension. Having all this ready saved me time once I finally got through to a representative.

0 coins

i always have better luck going to my local office in person tbh. the wait is long but at least ur not stuck on hold forever and then randomly disconnected

0 coins

I'm in a very similar situation - retired teacher with TRS pension, lost my husband young, and was denied widow's benefits due to GPO. The unfairness of this system is heartbreaking when our spouses paid into Social Security their entire working lives. I've been following the Social Security Fairness Act closely, and while I'm cautiously optimistic, I'm also trying not to get my hopes up too high after so many years of disappointment. Has anyone here actually received updated information from SSA about when these changes might take effect? I keep hearing "soon" but no concrete dates. Also wondering if anyone knows whether we'll need to reapply once the law changes or if SSA will automatically review cases like ours.

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same boat - teacher pension through TRS, husband passed away young, denied widow's benefits by just a small amount over the GPO threshold. It's so frustrating to find others with identical situations! From what I've gathered reading through this thread, it sounds like we'll likely need to contact SSA ourselves once the changes take effect rather than them automatically reviewing our cases. The retroactive benefits seem limited to maybe 12 months max, which is disappointing after waiting decades, but something is better than nothing. I'm planning to call SSA using some of the tips mentioned here about timing and preparation. Hang in there - it really does seem like this time might be different with the reform efforts.

0 coins

I feel your frustration completely - it's maddening how many of us are in nearly identical situations with the GPO rules. From what I've pieced together from various sources, SSA hasn't given concrete implementation dates yet, but most estimates suggest it could be 6-12 months after the legislation is signed (if it passes). Unfortunately, I think we'll definitely need to reapply or at least contact them to request a new determination - they won't automatically review cases. The retroactive period being limited is disappointing, but you're right that something is better than the nothing we've been getting. I'm also planning to use the calling strategies mentioned here. Stay strong - after waiting this long, we can make it through a few more months if it means finally getting what our husbands earned.

0 coins

Welcome to the community! I'm also a retired teacher dealing with the GPO situation, though I haven't lost a spouse. What strikes me about all these stories is how many dedicated educators are being penalized for serving our communities. The fact that your husband paid into Social Security for his entire working life and you can't access any of those benefits because you taught children is just wrong. I've been following the legislative updates, and while I can't give you a definitive timeline, the momentum does seem stronger this time than in previous years. One thing I'd suggest is documenting everything now - your TRS pension amount, your husband's Social Security earnings record, the date of your original denial, etc. When the changes do take effect, having all this organized will make the reapplication process smoother. Also, consider joining some of the teacher advocacy groups that are actively lobbying for this change. The more voices we have pushing for passage, the better our chances. After 20+ years of waiting, you deserve to finally receive what your husband earned.

0 coins

Thank you for the warm welcome and excellent advice! You're absolutely right about documenting everything - I've been keeping files but should probably organize them better for when the time comes. It really is encouraging to connect with other educators facing similar situations. The advocacy group suggestion is great too - I hadn't thought about getting more actively involved in pushing for the legislative change. After feeling so isolated with this issue for years, finding this community of people who truly understand the frustration has been incredibly helpful. I'll definitely start gathering my documentation more systematically and look into joining some teacher advocacy groups. Thanks again for the practical suggestions!

0 coins

I'm also a retired teacher facing the GPO situation, and my heart goes out to you. Twenty-four years of waiting after losing your husband so young must feel overwhelming. What really bothers me about these cases is how the system treats our spouses' lifetime contributions to Social Security as if they never happened. From everything I've been reading, the proposed changes should definitely help your situation since you were only $237 over the threshold. That's exactly the kind of case where the reformed GPO rules would make the biggest difference. While we're all cautiously optimistic, I'd echo what others have said about not counting on anything until it's actually signed into law. One practical tip: start gathering all your documentation now - your TRS pension statements, your husband's Social Security earnings record, and any correspondence from your 2021 application. When the time comes to reapply, having everything organized will save you stress and time. After waiting this long, you deserve for the process to go as smoothly as possible. Keep advocating for yourself and don't give up hope. The fact that so many of us are in similar situations shows this isn't just an individual problem - it's a systemic issue that needs fixing.

0 coins

Thank you for the encouragement and practical advice! You're absolutely right that it feels like our spouses' contributions just disappeared into thin air. I'm definitely going to start organizing all my documentation better - I have bits and pieces scattered in different files. It's reassuring to know that being just over the threshold by such a small amount puts me in a good position for when (hopefully when, not if) these changes take effect. The systematic unfairness of this whole situation really does highlight why reform is so desperately needed. Thanks for reminding me to stay hopeful while also being realistic about the legislative process.

0 coins

I'm new to this community but facing a very similar situation - retired teacher with 30 years in the system, husband passed away 5 years ago, and I was denied widow's benefits due to GPO. It's both heartbreaking and encouraging to see so many of us dealing with the exact same unfair treatment. Reading through everyone's experiences, I'm starting to feel more hopeful about the potential changes than I have in years. What really strikes me is how knowledgeable this community is about the technical details of WEP/GPO reform. I've been struggling to understand the implications of the proposed legislation, but the explanations here about phased implementation and benefit calculations have been incredibly helpful. One question I have - for those who have successfully contacted SSA recently, did you find the representatives knowledgeable about the pending changes, or are they still giving information based on current rules? I'm wondering if it's worth calling now or if I should wait until there's more clarity on the timeline. Thank you all for sharing your stories and insights. After feeling so alone with this issue, finding a community that truly understands makes all the difference.

0 coins

Social Security Administration AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today