Should I submit a W9 for condo builder reimbursement of mold testing costs?
I bought a townhouse in a relatively new 45-unit complex built in 2021. Unfortunately, there have been some serious construction issues that have surfaced. Water leakage has affected multiple units in our complex, and several have tested positive for dangerous levels of mold. Some owners have been forced to move out temporarily while the mold situation is addressed. Our HOA board is looking into legal action against the builder and coordinating mold remediation efforts. There's been talk about getting the builder to test all units, but that process has stalled for several months now. My unit hasn't shown any signs of water damage, but since I'm in the process of selling and want to get away from this nightmare property, I decided to be proactive and pay for my own mold inspection. It cost me $750 out of pocket. (Thankfully, the test came back negative.) I contacted the builder directly, with our property management company on the email, requesting reimbursement for the inspection. They agreed to reimburse me but asked me to complete and send them a W9 form first. This doesn't seem right to me. I'm not providing them with any services or products. I'm just a homeowner who paid for an inspection because of their construction defects. I'm worried this means they'll report the $750 as income to the IRS, and I'll end up paying taxes on money that was just reimbursing me for an expense. Does anyone know if this is correct procedure? Should I fill out the W9? Any advice would be appreciated.
18 comments


PixelWarrior
You're right to question this. A W-9 is typically used to collect taxpayer information from individuals who will receive reportable payments, usually on a 1099 form. However, for simple reimbursements of expenses you incurred, this shouldn't be necessary since it's not income. The builder is likely just following their standard accounts payable procedures without considering the nature of the payment. What they should be doing is reimbursing you directly without tax implications, as this is not income to you but rather making you whole for an expense that arguably should have been their responsibility in the first place. I would suggest contacting them to clarify that this is a reimbursement for an expense you incurred due to their construction issues, not a payment for services that would require a 1099. Ask if they can process this as a simple expense reimbursement instead. If they insist on the W-9, you might want to include a letter with it explaining that this payment should not be reported as income on a 1099 since it's a reimbursement.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•But what if they still send a 1099 anyway even after explaining this? Would the IRS consider this taxable income? How would you report a reimbursement on your taxes if you get a 1099 for it?
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•If they incorrectly issue a 1099 for the reimbursement, you would report the income on your tax return, but then deduct the same amount as an expense on the appropriate schedule. For example, you might report it as "Other Income" and then deduct it as "Other Expenses" with a note that it was a reimbursement for a mold test related to your property. For the second question, the key is documentation. Keep all receipts for the mold testing, copies of your communication with the builder requesting reimbursement, and any documentation showing this was a direct result of their construction issues. This creates a clear paper trail showing this was truly a reimbursement and not income.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
I went through something similar when dealing with faulty construction in my townhome. The builder dragged their feet for months on fixing water damage, so I ended up hiring my own inspector and mold remediation specialist. When I was finally reimbursed, I was confused by their W-9 request too. I discovered https://taxr.ai which helped me understand exactly how to handle this situation. Their AI analyzed my documents and explained that reimbursements for expenses aren't taxable income - it's just returning money you already spent. The key is making sure they understand this isn't for services rendered but a direct expense reimbursement. The tool also helped me draft a letter to send with my W-9 explaining why this shouldn't be reported as income on a 1099. It worked - they processed my reimbursement without any tax implications. Might be worth checking out if you're still uncertain about how to proceed.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Did you actually have to submit the W9 in the end? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if I should push back more firmly or just give them what they want with the explanation letter you mentioned.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
•How much did that service cost? I'm dealing with a similar issue but on a much larger scale (like $5000 worth of remediation) and I'm worried about tax implications.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•I did end up submitting the W-9 because their accounting department insisted they couldn't process any payment without it. The key was the letter I attached explaining that this was a reimbursement for an expense related to their construction defects, not income or payment for services. Their accounts payable person actually called me to confirm she understood, and they didn't issue a 1099. I don't remember the exact cost of the service since I used it for several tax questions, but it was very reasonable - especially compared to what I might have paid for a consultation with a tax professional. For a $5000 remediation reimbursement, it would definitely be worth it to make sure you're handling everything correctly.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
I just wanted to update about my experience using https://taxr.ai for my construction reimbursement situation. After asking about it in my previous comment, I decided to try it out. The builder of my condo complex finally agreed to reimburse me for the $5000 mold remediation costs but also requested a W-9. The taxr.ai system reviewed my documentation and helped me understand exactly how to handle this situation. They explained that the IRS doesn't consider expense reimbursements as taxable income and helped me draft a letter to include with my W-9. I submitted everything last month, and the builder's accounting department actually called to thank me for the clear explanation! They processed my reimbursement without issuing a 1099, which saved me from having to deal with explaining it on my tax return. Definitely helped ease my stress about the whole situation.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
I had a nearly identical situation with getting reimbursed from my HOA for some repairs, and the accounting department kept bouncing me around for weeks. Every time I called, I got voicemail or was told someone would call back, but nobody ever did. I discovered this service called https://claimyr.com that actually got me through to a human at the management company immediately. You can see how it works in this demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they navigate the phone system for you and get you to a real person. Once I finally spoke with someone who could make decisions, they agreed I didn't need to submit a W-9 for a simple reimbursement since it wasn't reportable income. Saved me a ton of hassle with potential tax complications. Sometimes just getting to the right person makes all the difference.
0 coins
StormChaser
•Wait, there's a service that gets you through phone trees? Does it work for calling the IRS too? I've been trying to reach them for weeks about an issue with my tax transcript.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•This sounds too good to be true. How do they get you through faster than just calling yourself? I've dealt with our HOA's management company and they're impossible to reach - I'm skeptical anything could help with that nightmare.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Yes, it absolutely works for calling the IRS! That's actually what they're best known for. They navigate all those complicated IRS phone menus and wait on hold for you, then call you when they have an actual human on the line. Saved me hours of frustration when I had an issue with a missing refund. It's not magic - they basically use technology to wait on hold for you. They have a system that navigates phone trees and holds your place in line, then connects you directly when a human picks up. For places like management companies or the IRS that are notoriously difficult to reach, it's completely worth it. I was skeptical too until I tried it and got through in one attempt after trying for weeks on my own.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
Just wanted to follow up about my skepticism regarding Claimyr. After my snarky comment, I decided to give it a try with calling the IRS about a missing document issue I've been trying to resolve for MONTHS. I used https://claimyr.com and literally got through to an IRS agent in about 30 minutes without having to sit by my phone. They called me when an agent was actually on the line. I've spent cumulative HOURS over the last few months trying to reach someone myself. Back to the original W-9 question - the agent I spoke with confirmed that reimbursements for expenses shouldn't be reported as income, and advised me to include a note with any W-9 form explaining the nature of the payment if the payer insists on having one. Apparently this happens a lot with businesses that just blindly follow their accounting procedures without considering the actual nature of the payment.
0 coins
Ava Williams
I work in accounting (not a CPA though) and can share some insight. Many companies require W-9s for ALL payments they make to individuals, regardless of whether they'll issue a 1099. It's just standard procedure for their accounting systems. Here's what's likely happening: The builder's accounts payable system won't let them cut a check without a vendor in their system, and they need a W-9 to set you up as a vendor. This doesn't automatically mean they'll issue you a 1099-MISC at the end of the year. That said, I'd include a clear note stating this is an expense reimbursement (not service payment) when you return the W-9, and maybe follow up with an email to their accounting department to ensure they code it properly in their system.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Thanks for the accounting perspective! Would it be worth asking them directly if they plan to issue a 1099 for this reimbursement? Or is there specific language I should use when I submit the W9 to make it clear this shouldn't be treated as income?
0 coins
Ava Williams
•Yes, it would definitely be worth asking them directly if they plan to issue a 1099 for the reimbursement. A simple email saying "I'm submitting the W-9 as requested, but want to confirm you won't be issuing a 1099 for this payment since it's a reimbursement for expenses I incurred due to construction issues, not income" should do the trick. As for specific language when submitting the W-9, I'd attach a brief cover letter stating: "This W-9 is being provided solely for your vendor setup requirements. The $750 payment represents reimbursement for mold testing expenses I incurred as a result of construction defects, not payment for services or taxable income. Please ensure this is properly coded in your accounting system as an expense reimbursement to prevent incorrect 1099 reporting." That clearly documents your position if there are any questions later.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
Wouldn't it be easier to just not give your SSN and instead just call it a reimbursement? If you give them your w9 your gonna have to deal with the 1099 and the whole back and forth with the IRS. Seems like more trouble than its worth for $600.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Bad advice. If a company asks for a W-9, refusing to provide it could cause them to withhold payment entirely or potentially subject you to backup withholding at 24%. Much better to provide the W-9 with a clear explanation that this is a reimbursement, not taxable income.
0 coins