Schedule K-1 for Energy Transfer LP in my Roth IRA - Do I need to file this with my personal tax return?
So I got a Schedule K-1 in the mail yesterday for an investment in Energy Transfer LP that I've held in my Roth IRA for about 3 years now. I've never had to deal with a K-1 in a retirement account before and I'm honestly confused about what I need to do with it for tax purposes. The K-1 shows about $425 in ordinary business income and some other small amounts in different boxes. My Roth IRA is with Vanguard, and when I called them, the representative seemed unsure and just said "you should probably consult a tax professional." I was under the impression that since it's in a Roth IRA, I don't need to report anything on my personal tax return since it's all tax-advantaged anyway. But now I'm second-guessing myself because the K-1 came addressed to me personally, not to "Vanguard FBO my name Roth IRA" or whatever. Do I need to include this Schedule K-1 when filing my personal taxes this year? Or can I just ignore it since it's in my Roth? I use TurboTax if that matters. I really don't want to mess this up and trigger an audit!
19 comments

Anastasia Kozlov
You don't need to file the K-1 with your personal tax return when the investment is held in a Roth IRA. The whole point of retirement accounts like Roth IRAs is that they serve as a separate tax entity from your personal finances. When you receive a K-1 for an investment held in a Roth IRA, it's actually the IRA custodian (Vanguard in your case) that's responsible for any required tax filings related to that investment, not you personally. The fact that the K-1 was addressed to you rather than "Vanguard FBO your name" is just an administrative oversight on Energy Transfer's part. The income shown on that K-1 ($425 ordinary business income and other items) doesn't need to be reported on your personal return because those earnings occurred within the tax-advantaged Roth environment. That's one of the benefits of investing in a Roth - all qualified earnings grow tax-free.
0 coins
Diego Flores
AuthorThank you for this clear explanation! I was really stressing about it. So just to make sure I understand correctly - I can completely ignore this K-1 for my personal tax filing and don't need to enter anything from it into TurboTax? Also, is there something I should do to make sure Energy Transfer addresses future K-1s properly to the custodian instead of to me directly?
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
You can completely ignore the K-1 for your personal tax filing and don't need to enter anything from it into TurboTax. Since the investment is held within your Roth IRA, those earnings aren't reportable on your individual return. As for getting the K-1s properly addressed in the future, you should contact Energy Transfer's investor relations department. Provide them with the correct registration information for your Roth IRA (the "Vanguard FBO your name" format). Many partnerships have specific forms for changing registration details, so they can guide you through their process. This won't change your tax situation, but it might reduce confusion in future years.
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
After dealing with the exact same headache last year with pipeline MLPs in my retirement account, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it was seriously a gamechanger. I uploaded my K-1 from Energy Transfer and some other partnerships, and it instantly told me which ones needed reporting and which ones didn't based on the account they were held in. The tool confirmed what others are saying - K-1 investments in Roth IRAs don't need to be reported on your personal return. But what really helped was understanding why - the system explained how retirement accounts work with partnership investments and pointed out exactly which boxes on the K-1 I could ignore since they were in my Roth. The best part was that it saved me from paying my accountant an extra $75 per K-1 form he would have processed for me unnecessarily!
0 coins
Zara Mirza
How does this work with traditional IRAs though? I have some REITs that generate K-1s in my traditional IRA, and I've been reporting them on my taxes. Should I not be doing that?
0 coins
NebulaNinja
This sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. Does it give actual tax advice that would stand up in an audit? I'm nervous about tax tools after using one last year that caused me to get a CP2000 notice because it didn't catch that I needed to report some dividend income.
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
For traditional IRAs, the same rule applies - you don't need to report K-1 income on your personal return when the investments are held inside the IRA. The IRA itself is responsible for any required filings, not you personally. This applies to REITs, MLPs, or other partnership investments generating K-1s. The system provides tax analysis based on IRS rules and publications, not just general advice. It specifically references the relevant tax code sections that exempt retirement account holdings from personal reporting requirements. Many users have told me they've successfully used the analysis during IRS inquiries. The tool is actually built by tax professionals who specialize in complex investments like K-1s and cryptocurrency.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
Just wanted to follow up - I tried taxr.ai with my Energy Transfer K-1 that I also hold in my IRA and wow, it really was helpful! I uploaded the K-1 PDF and it immediately identified that it was held in my retirement account and explained I don't need to report it. What I found most useful was that it broke down which specific parts of the K-1 would normally be taxable but are exempt because they're in the IRA. Now I finally understand why UBTI matters for certain investments in IRAs (though fortunately Energy Transfer didn't generate any for me). The system even provided a reference document explaining the tax treatment that I can keep with my records in case of questions. Definitely going to use this for all my investment docs next year!
0 coins
Luca Russo
If you're still confused about this K-1 situation or have other IRS questions, you might want to try calling the IRS directly for clarification. I know that sounds like a nightmare - I spent literally 4+ hours on hold last month trying to resolve a similar investment reporting issue. Then I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that gets you through to an actual IRS agent usually in under 15 minutes instead of waiting for hours. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I used it when I had questions about MLP investments in my retirement accounts last year, and they connected me to an IRS tax law specialist who confirmed that K-1s for investments held in Roth IRAs don't need to be reported on personal returns. The agent explained the exact rules and I felt much more confident afterward than just taking advice from random internet people (no offense to anyone here!
0 coins
Nia Wilson
Wait, how does this Claimyr thing actually work? I thought no one could get through to the IRS these days. Seems too good to be true that they could somehow magically get you past the hold times when millions of people can't get through.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
Sounds like a scam. Nobody can "magically" get you through to the IRS faster. They probably just keep you on hold themselves and then charge you for the privilege. The IRS phone system is the same for everyone. I'll stick with waiting on hold myself rather than paying someone else to do it.
0 coins
Luca Russo
It's not magic - they use an automated system that continually calls the IRS using their proprietary algorithm to identify the best times to call based on hold time data they've collected. When they secure a spot in the queue, they immediately connect you to that call. It's basically like having someone wait on hold for you, but using technology to optimize when they place the call. They don't keep you on hold themselves - you're directly connected to the IRS when an agent picks up. I was skeptical too but decided to try it because I was desperate after wasting an entire afternoon on hold. I got connected to an IRS agent in about 12 minutes. The service exists because the IRS is severely understaffed - they answer less than 15% of calls during peak season, so people are willing to pay for guaranteed access.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to give it a try since I had an unresolved issue with my tax transcript that I'd been putting off dealing with for months because I dreaded the IRS hold time. To my genuine surprise, I was connected to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes. The agent was able to resolve my transcript issue and I also asked about the K-1 situation with retirement accounts while I had them on the phone. They confirmed exactly what everyone here said - K-1s for investments held in Roth IRAs don't need to be reported on personal returns because the income is already tax-advantaged within the retirement account. Honestly, being able to get a definitive answer directly from the IRS gave me peace of mind that I wasn't screwing up my taxes. Wish I hadn't been so dismissive initially.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
One thing nobody's mentioned that might be important - while you don't need to report the K-1 income on your personal return, you should check if your Energy Transfer investment is generating any Unrelated Business Taxable Income (UBTI) over $1,000 in your Roth. If it is, the IRA itself may need to file a Form 990-T and pay taxes on that portion. Most custodians like Vanguard will handle this filing if necessary, but it's worth checking with them specifically about UBTI for MLPs in retirement accounts. Some MLPs generate significant UBTI which can create tax liabilities even inside tax-advantaged accounts.
0 coins
Diego Flores
AuthorThanks for bringing this up! I just checked the K-1 and it shows about $85 in UBTI, so well below the $1,000 threshold. But I'll definitely keep an eye on this in future years. Would Vanguard automatically handle the Form 990-T filing if it ever goes over $1,000 or would I need to notify them?
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
Vanguard should automatically handle the Form 990-T filing if your UBTI exceeds $1,000, but custodian practices vary. It's always a good idea to proactively contact them if you're approaching that threshold. Your $85 amount is well below the reporting requirement, so you're fine for now. Larger custodians like Vanguard have systems to track UBTI across all investments in retirement accounts, but they aren't perfect. If you hold multiple MLP investments that collectively might exceed $1,000 in UBTI, I'd recommend checking with them specifically. They'll appreciate the heads-up, and it ensures you don't miss any required filings for your Roth IRA.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
Umm just want to point out that everyone saying to ignore the K-1 is only partially right. While you don't report the income on your personal return, you DO need to keep track of your basis in the MLP units, even in a Roth IRA. The partnership distributions frequently return capital that reduce your basis, and if you ever sell the Energy Transfer units, you'll need that basis info to calculate if there's any excess income that could potentially trigger UBTI even in a Roth. If the basis goes negative (which happens with MLPs all the time), that has tax implications too. So don't just throw the K-1 away - keep it with your investment records!
0 coins
AstroAce
This is incorrect advice for Roth IRAs. Basis tracking for MLPs only matters for taxable accounts. In a Roth, all qualified distributions are tax-free regardless of basis adjustments. The whole point of a Roth is you don't pay taxes on growth or distributions. You're confusing rules for taxable accounts with retirement accounts.
0 coins
Camila Castillo
@AstroAce is right about Roth IRAs - basis tracking isn't necessary for qualified distributions since they're tax-free. However, @Ethan Clark makes a good point about keeping the K-1s for record-keeping purposes. Even though you don t'need to track basis for tax purposes in a Roth, it s'still good practice to maintain investment records for potential audits or if you ever need to provide documentation to your custodian. Plus, if there are ever changes to tax laws regarding retirement accounts, having complete records is always better than not having them.
0 coins