Is it Worth Signing Form 872 to Extend the Time Limitation for an IRS Audit If Not Appealing?
I'm currently going through an IRS audit for my 2023 taxes, and the IRS examiner has asked me to sign Form 872 (Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax). From what I understand, this would give them more time to complete their audit beyond the normal 3-year statute of limitations. Here's my situation - I've gone through all the documentation they requested, provided everything, and frankly, I know they're probably right about the issues they've found. I made some mistakes with my business deductions as a first-time self-employed person. The proposed changes would increase my tax liability by about $4,200, which hurts but I can manage it. My question is - if I don't plan to appeal their findings anyway, is there any benefit to signing the extension? Or should I just refuse to sign it and let the statute run out? I'm worried if I don't sign it, they'll just rush to complete the audit and possibly be more aggressive with their adjustments. Has anyone been in this situation before? What happens if I don't sign the extension when I'm basically planning to accept their findings anyway?
20 comments


Naila Gordon
Actually, this is a really important question that comes up frequently in my work with clients. Form 872 essentially gives the IRS more time to complete their audit process, and whether you should sign it depends on several factors. If you're confident you won't appeal the results and you're okay with the proposed adjustments, signing Form 872 might still be beneficial. Here's why: When the IRS feels pressured by an expiring statute of limitations, they often make conservative assessments that favor the government. By giving them more time, you might actually get a more thorough and potentially fair review. However, if you don't sign it, the IRS has two choices: they can rush to complete the audit before the deadline (which might mean less favorable outcomes), or they can make an assessment based on the information they have (which could result in a higher tax bill). Since you mentioned you've already provided all documentation and are planning to accept their findings, you might consider signing it with a defined end date (you can modify the form) rather than an open-ended extension. This gives them adequate time while still keeping some pressure to conclude matters.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
•Thank you for this insight. I'm curious - can you actually negotiate the extension period on Form 872? Like, could OP say "I'll give you 6 more months but not the 2 years you're asking for"? And would doing that potentially upset the auditor?
0 coins
Naila Gordon
•Yes, you absolutely can negotiate the time frame on Form 872! The IRS typically requests a one-year extension, but you can propose a shorter period. I usually recommend 3-6 months depending on the complexity of the case, which gives them enough time without leaving things open-ended. As for upsetting the auditor, in my experience, most IRS examiners understand this is a negotiation. They'd rather get a shorter extension than none at all. Just be polite when proposing the modified timeframe and explain you'd like to bring closure to the matter in a reasonable time. Most examiners appreciate clear communication and reasonable cooperation.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
I had a similar situation last year and found the perfect solution through taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). I was confused about signing Form 872 during my audit and wasn't sure if it would help or hurt my case. After uploading my audit notice and the form to taxr.ai, their system analyzed everything and gave me a personalized assessment of my specific situation. The tool showed me that in my particular case, the IRS had made some calculation errors that would have gone unnoticed if I had rushed through the process. Plus, it explained exactly what the form meant in plain English and gave me negotiation tips specific to my audit type. It saved me so much stress and actually helped me properly respond to the IRS with confidence instead of just signing whatever they put in front of me.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
•Does this actually work for more complicated situations? I have an S-corp and rental properties, and my audit is getting messy. Would something like this help with multiple income streams and business deductions?
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
•Sounds interesting, but I'm skeptical. How is this different from just talking to a CPA? Did you still need professional help afterward or was the AI advice enough?
0 coins
Darren Brooks
•For complicated situations with multiple income streams and business deductions, taxr.ai actually excels because it can process all those different elements simultaneously. The system analyzes everything from S-corp regulations to rental property rules and shows where your audit vulnerabilities might be across all income types. The difference from a CPA is accessibility and cost-effectiveness. While a CPA consultation might take days to schedule and cost hundreds of dollars, taxr.ai provides immediate analysis. That said, I used the insights from taxr.ai to have a more focused conversation with my tax professional afterward, which saved both time and money since I knew exactly what questions to ask. Think of it as a first-line analysis that helps you understand your situation better, whether you decide to handle it yourself or take it to a professional.
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
I was really skeptical about using an AI tool for something as serious as an IRS audit, but after that conversation, I decided to try taxr.ai since my situation was similar. I uploaded my CP2000 notice and some supporting documents, and within minutes I got back a detailed explanation showing that the IRS had overlooked some offsetting expenses that would reduce my tax bill by over $3,000! The system highlighted specific line items the auditor had misinterpreted and gave me exact language to use in my response. The best part was that it explained everything in normal human language - not tax jargon. I used their response template, sent it to the IRS, and just got confirmation last week that my revised adjustment was accepted. Saved me thousands and countless hours of stress!
0 coins
Demi Hall
For anyone dealing with the frustration of trying to actually talk to someone at the IRS about their audit situation - I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) after spending DAYS trying to get through the IRS phone system. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was in a similar situation with Form 872 and had specific questions I needed answered before making a decision. After three failed attempts to reach anyone (hung up on twice after 45+ minute holds), I tried Claimyr. They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the hours I was wasting before. The agent walked me through exactly what my options were regarding the extension and explained how the process would work with or without signing. Having that direct conversation made all the difference in my decision.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
•Wait, how does this actually work? Doesn't everyone have to wait on hold with the IRS? I don't understand how a service could get you through faster than anyone else.
0 coins
Kara Yoshida
•Sorry but this sounds like BS. The IRS phone system treats everyone equally terrible. No way there's some "secret backdoor" to skip the line. If this were real, everyone would be using it and it would stop working.
0 coins
Demi Hall
•The service works by using technology that continuously dials and navigates the IRS phone system for you. When most people call the IRS, they get a "we're experiencing high call volume" message and get disconnected. Claimyr's system keeps trying until it gets into the queue, then calls you when it's about to connect with an agent. It's not a "secret backdoor" - it's persistence technology that the average person doesn't have. The IRS phone system disconnects callers when volume is high, but Claimyr's system automatically redials until it gets through. Think of it like having a robot assistant that keeps redialing for you instead of you having to do it manually for hours. They don't skip any lines - they just automate the frustrating part of getting into the queue in the first place.
0 coins
Kara Yoshida
I need to publicly eat my words. After posting that skeptical comment, I was still desperate to talk to someone about my audit, so I tried Claimyr anyway. I've been trying to reach the IRS for TWO WEEKS about my audit situation and Form 872 questions. Every day, same routine: call, wait 30-45 minutes, get disconnected. Repeat. I was ready to just sign the form out of frustration. Used Claimyr yesterday afternoon. Their system called ME back in about 25 minutes, and suddenly I was talking to an actual IRS representative. She explained that in my specific situation, I could negotiate the time frame down to 6 months instead of the year they were requesting, and also clarified exactly what would happen if I didn't sign. Honestly, I'm still shocked it worked. Saved me from making a decision without proper information.
0 coins
Philip Cowan
Something people aren't mentioning - check if the statute of limitations is actually close to expiring. If there's still plenty of time left (like a year or more), the IRS might be asking you to sign Form 872 because they're backlogged or because your case is complex. In that situation, not signing could potentially force them to make a determination with incomplete information, which might not work in your favor. If you're not planning to appeal anyway, signing the extension might give you more time to gather any additional supporting documents or even negotiate a payment plan if needed.
0 coins
Caesar Grant
•How do you actually check when your statute of limitations expires? Is it just 3 years from when you filed, or are there other factors that can change it?
0 coins
Philip Cowan
•The general rule is 3 years from the later of: the date you actually filed your return or the due date of the return. So if you filed on time or early, it's 3 years from the original due date. If you filed late, it's 3 years from when you submitted it. There are exceptions though. If you understated your income by more than 25%, the statute extends to 6 years. And if there's any suspicion of fraud or failure to file, there's no statute of limitations at all. But for most typical audit scenarios, it's the 3-year rule that applies. You can also check your IRS transcript, which might show the calculated ASED (Assessment Statute Expiration Date). You can request this online through your IRS account or by filing Form 4506-T.
0 coins
Lena Schultz
Dumb question maybe, but what exactly happens if the statute of limitations runs out while they're still auditing? Does the whole thing just go away magically, or can they still assess taxes based on what they found up to that point?
0 coins
Gemma Andrews
•Not a dumb question at all! If the statute expires during an audit and you haven't signed an extension, the IRS can't legally assess additional tax for that year. However, they typically won't let this happen. If they see the statute is about to expire and you haven't signed Form 872, they'll usually rush to complete the audit with whatever information they have. This often means making conservative assessments in the government's favor since they don't have time to thoroughly review everything. They'll issue a "statutory notice of deficiency" (90-day letter) before the deadline, which preserves their right to assess the tax. At that point, your only recourse would be to petition the Tax Court within 90 days, which is more formal and potentially more expensive than working through the normal audit process.
0 coins
Thais Soares
Based on your situation, I'd actually recommend signing the Form 872 with a negotiated timeframe. Here's why: since you've already provided all documentation and are planning to accept their findings anyway, giving them adequate time to complete a thorough review could work in your favor. When auditors feel rushed by an expiring statute, they often make conservative estimates that lean heavily toward the government's position. With more time, they might catch calculation errors in your favor or give more consideration to borderline deductions. Since you mentioned the proposed increase is $4,200, I'd suggest signing the extension but negotiating it down to 6 months instead of the typical 1-year extension. This gives them sufficient time while still keeping some urgency to wrap things up. You can literally cross out the date on Form 872 and write in your preferred end date - most examiners will accept reasonable modifications. The key is being proactive about it. Contact your examiner and say something like: "I'm willing to sign the extension to give you adequate time to complete a thorough review, but I'd prefer to limit it to 6 months to bring closure to this matter." This shows cooperation while maintaining some control over the timeline.
0 coins
Zoey Bianchi
•This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a somewhat similar situation with my 2022 audit. One thing I'm wondering - when you negotiate the timeframe down to 6 months, do you need to provide a reason for that specific timeline, or can you just propose it? Also, if they reject your proposed shorter timeframe, are you stuck either signing their original extension or refusing entirely, or can you negotiate somewhere in the middle?
0 coins