< Back to IRS

Statiia Aarssizan

How do people get away with cheating on taxes? What enforcement loopholes exist?

I've been listening to this financial podcast recently, and they did an episode about IRS enforcement and tax audits that got me thinking. The hosts claimed that regular W-2 employees basically can't cheat on taxes since all our income is reported directly to the IRS. But apparently wealthy business owners whose income isn't tracked by third parties can hide income pretty easily and even if caught, the penalties aren't scary enough to stop them. Not planning to cheat (I swear!), but I'm genuinely curious - is this actually true? Do business owners really have that much more opportunity to fudge their taxes? And what are the most common ways people actually get away with tax evasion? Just seems crazy that the system would have such obvious loopholes.

Yes, there's definitely truth to what you heard. The tax gap (difference between taxes owed and taxes paid) is heavily concentrated among certain types of income that lack third-party reporting. When you're a W-2 employee, your employer reports your wages directly to the IRS, making it nearly impossible to underreport income without getting caught immediately. Same with 1099s, bank interest, and stock sales - all reported directly to the IRS. But for business owners, especially those dealing with cash or who have complex business structures, they self-report income and expenses. The IRS has no automatic verification system for a restaurant owner claiming they made $500K instead of $700K, or a consultant claiming excessive "business expenses" that were actually personal. As for penalties - they're often just a percentage of the unpaid tax plus interest. For someone making calculated decisions, it can sometimes feel like a worthwhile gamble, especially given how underfunded IRS enforcement has been in recent years.

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

This makes sense but how does the IRS actually determine who to audit then? Is it just random or do they have some kind of system? I always thought they had some kind of algorithm that flagged suspicious returns.

0 coins

The IRS uses both random selection and targeted approaches. They do have sophisticated algorithms that score returns based on deviation from statistical norms for similar taxpayers. If your deductions or business expenses are significantly higher than average for your income level, that raises your score. They also have specific audit initiatives focused on areas where compliance is historically poor. Large cash businesses, taxpayers with foreign assets, and high-net-worth individuals with complex returns tend to face more scrutiny. The IRS also investigates when they receive credible tips about tax evasion.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

After dealing with some stressful tax situations in my business, I found this AI tool called taxr.ai that's been super helpful for understanding audit risk. I was worried about how I was categorizing some expenses and wasn't sure if I was creating red flags. Their system analyzed my tax documents and showed me exactly which deductions were potentially problematic and might trigger an audit. The site https://taxr.ai basically shows you where you might be pushing boundaries too far before you file. Turns out I was way too aggressive with some home office deductions that could have caused problems. They even have this feature that compares your business expense ratios to industry averages so you can see if you're an outlier that might get flagged by IRS algorithms. Definitely gave me peace of mind.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

How accurate is it though? Like does it actually have access to the same flags the IRS uses or is it just guessing?

0 coins

Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. Couldn't you just use a regular CPA for this? Why would an AI know better than a professional who does this for a living?

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

It doesn't claim to have the exact IRS algorithms, but it uses data from thousands of real audits to identify patterns in what triggers them. It's more about statistical risk assessment based on real-world outcomes. Yes, a good CPA is invaluable, but they're expensive and often don't have time to do deep statistical analysis. I actually use both - my CPA for filing and strategic advice, and taxr.ai as a second opinion on risk areas. My accountant was actually impressed with the insights it provided about some industry-specific deductions I was taking that were technically legal but statistically high-risk.

0 coins

I was skeptical about taxr.ai at first but decided to try it after having some worries about my side business deductions. The audit risk assessment was eye-opening! It flagged that my vehicle expense deductions were significantly higher than others in my industry and showed me exactly how to document things properly to avoid problems. When I made the adjustments it recommended, my "audit risk score" dropped significantly. The document analysis part was actually impressive - it caught inconsistencies between my 1099s and Schedule C that I hadn't noticed. Didn't replace my accountant, but definitely gave me more confidence that I wasn't accidentally creating problems. Worth checking out if you're worried about audit risk.

0 coins

If you're dealing with tax issues or trying to get answers from the IRS, good luck getting anyone on the phone... I spent WEEKS trying to resolve a tax notice before finding Claimyr. Their service actually gets you through to an IRS agent instead of waiting on hold forever. I was about to give up on resolving a mistake on my return that could have cost me thousands, but https://claimyr.com got me connected to an actual human at the IRS in less than an hour. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When you're dealing with potential audit issues or trying to clear up filing questions, being able to actually speak to someone makes all the difference. The IRS phone system is basically designed to make you give up from frustration.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

How does this even work? The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. Do they have some special access or something?

0 coins

This sounds like total BS. If it was possible to skip the IRS phone queue, everyone would be doing it. Sounds like just another scam targeting people desperate for tax help.

0 coins

They use an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent finally picks up, you get a call connecting you directly. It's not special access - they're just handling the frustrating waiting part. The reason everyone's not doing it is that most people don't know it exists. It's a relatively new service that's solving a real problem. I was skeptical too, but when you've been trying to resolve a tax issue for weeks and getting nowhere, it's worth trying something different.

0 coins

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I had a notice from the IRS about potential unreported income that was actually just a reporting error from one of my clients. Tried calling the IRS myself and gave up after an hour on hold. Decided to try Claimyr as a last resort and... it actually worked exactly as advertised. Got a call back when they connected with an IRS agent, explained my situation, and got the whole thing resolved in one call. The agent confirmed it was just a reporting mismatch and closed the case. Would have taken me days of trying to get through on my own. For anyone dealing with potential audit issues or notices, being able to actually speak to someone at the IRS quickly makes a huge difference. Not cheap but saved me a ton of stress.

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Former tax preparer here. The podcast is mostly right but missing some nuance. The real divide isn't just W-2 vs business owners, but reported vs unreported income. Schedule C filers (self-employed) do have more "flexibility" but they're also audited at higher rates. The truly wealthy rarely engage in outright fraud - too risky and unnecessary. Instead, they use perfectly legal strategies involving business structures, timing of income recognition, strategic losses, and depreciation schedules. The real advantage is having the resources to hire specialists who understand every obscure provision in the tax code. Cash businesses (restaurants, salons, contractors) have historically had more opportunity to underreport, but even this is changing with the rise of digital payments. The real tax avoidance happens through sophisticated structures like offshore arrangements and complex partnerships, not simple underreporting.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

What about cryptocurrency? I've heard people say that's the wild west for tax evasion. Is that still true?

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Cryptocurrency was the "wild west" for a while, but that's rapidly changing. The IRS has made substantial investments in tracking crypto transactions. Major exchanges now issue 1099s, and they've been using blockchain analysis tools to identify unreported transactions. The 2023 infrastructure law expanded reporting requirements significantly, and the IRS has been successful in getting court orders to obtain user information from exchanges. People thinking crypto transactions are invisible to the IRS are taking an extremely high-risk position. The penalties for willful non-reporting of crypto can be severe, including potential criminal charges in egregious cases.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

I remember reading somewhere that restaurant owners often underreport cash sales. Is that still common with everyone using credit cards and apps these days?

0 coins

My brother-in-law owns a restaurant and says cash manipulation is getting harder. POS systems track everything, and the IRS knows typical food cost to sales ratios for different types of restaurants. If your reported sales don't match up with your food purchases, that's a red flag. Plus, like you said, cash is becoming a smaller percentage of transactions every year. Most restaurants are around 80-90% card payments now. The real audit risk for restaurants these days is incorrectly classifying workers as independent contractors instead of employees.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

The enforcement gap is real, but it's worth noting that the IRS has been significantly increasing its enforcement budget and technology capabilities recently. The Inflation Reduction Act provided $80 billion in additional funding over 10 years, much of which is going toward enforcement. They're also using more sophisticated data analytics to identify non-compliance patterns. For example, they can cross-reference business income reports with industry benchmarks, supplier payments, and even social media activity to flag inconsistencies. What's interesting is that audit rates have historically been inverse to income level - lower-income taxpayers claiming EITC were audited more frequently than millionaires, simply because those audits were cheaper to conduct. The new funding is supposed to shift focus back to high-income, complex returns where the actual tax gap is largest. The psychological aspect is important too - most people comply because they assume they'll get caught, even when the actual audit risk is low. As enforcement becomes more visible and sophisticated, that compliance effect tends to increase across all income levels.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

This is really insightful! I had no idea about the inverse relationship between income and audit rates - that seems completely backwards from what you'd expect. Do you know if the IRS has published any data on whether that shift toward high-income enforcement is actually happening yet, or is it still too early to see the effects of that new funding? Also curious about the social media monitoring you mentioned - that sounds almost dystopian but I guess if people are posting about expensive purchases while reporting low income, that would be pretty obvious to flag.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today