Utah UCC Article 9 Filing Requirements - Debtor Name Standards?
I'm working on a complex equipment financing deal in Utah and running into some confusion about Article 9 requirements. The borrower is an LLC with a slightly different name on their articles of incorporation versus what they use on contracts. Our UCC-1 got kicked back twice now because of debtor name issues. The SOS portal keeps rejecting it but the error messages aren't super clear about exactly what format they want. Has anyone dealt with Utah's specific requirements for LLC debtor names under Article 9? I know the secured transaction rules are pretty strict about exact name matching but I'm not sure if Utah has any particular quirks I should know about. This is holding up a $180K equipment loan and I'm starting to panic a bit. Any guidance would be really appreciated.
37 comments
Join the conversation
Leila Haddad
Utah follows the standard Article 9 rules pretty closely. For LLCs, you need to use the exact name as it appears on the Articles of Organization filed with the Utah Division of Corporations. Even a missing comma or 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' can cause rejections. Did you check the exact spelling on the state's business entity database?
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•I did check but there seems to be a discrepancy between what's in their system and what the company actually uses day-to-day. The articles show 'Mountain West Equipment Solutions LLC' but all their contracts and bank accounts use 'Mountain West Equipment Solutions, LLC' with the comma.
0 coins
Leila Haddad
•That comma makes all the difference. You have to use exactly what's in the state filing - no comma in this case. Utah's system is pretty rigid about this stuff.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
Been there! Utah rejected three of my filings last month for similar name issues. The key is getting the debtor name field to match character-for-character with what's on file. I learned to always do a business entity search first and copy/paste the exact name from their database.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•This is why I hate dealing with Utah filings. Some states are more forgiving but Utah's system is unforgiving.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•It's frustrating but at least they're consistent. Once you know their rules it gets easier.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
Actually ran into something similar recently and found this tool called Certana.ai that helped me catch the name mismatch before filing. You can upload your charter documents and UCC-1 draft and it automatically flags any inconsistencies between the names. Saved me from another rejection and the time delay that comes with it. For a $180K deal, might be worth checking your documents before you file again.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•That sounds useful - does it work specifically with Utah requirements or is it more general?
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•It's designed for UCC filings nationwide so it should catch the standard Article 9 debtor name issues regardless of state. The tool basically compares your corporate docs against your UCC forms to spot discrepancies.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•Interesting, never heard of that service before. Might look into it for future deals.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Utah Article 9 is pretty straightforward once you understand their specific formatting. Make sure you're not including any dba names or trade names in the debtor field - that's another common rejection reason. Stick to the legal entity name only.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Good point. The company does business under a shortened name but I made sure to use the full LLC name from the articles.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Smart. Trade names go in the additional debtor info section if anywhere, never in the main debtor name field.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
What collateral are you securing? Sometimes Utah gets picky about collateral descriptions too, especially for equipment. Article 9 requires reasonably identifying the collateral and Utah tends to be strict about vague descriptions.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•It's construction equipment - excavators and dozers. I used pretty detailed descriptions with serial numbers and model info.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•That should be fine then. Serial numbers are the gold standard for equipment collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•Yeah equipment with serials is usually bulletproof from a collateral description standpoint.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
Have you tried calling the Utah SOS office directly? Sometimes they can give you specific guidance about why your filing was rejected. Their commercial filings division is usually pretty helpful.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•I tried but got transferred around a few times. Might try again though if the next filing gets kicked back.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
•Ask specifically for someone who handles UCC rejections. They have people who specialize in that.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
Just curious - are you doing this as a fixture filing or regular UCC-1? Utah has some specific requirements for fixture filings that differ from regular personal property filings under Article 9.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Regular UCC-1. This is mobile construction equipment so no fixtures involved.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•Got it. Fixture filings have their own complications in Utah so good that you don't have to deal with that.
0 coins
Zara Khan
I've been doing Utah UCC filings for years and the debtor name thing trips everyone up at first. The state's business entity search is your friend - always double-check the exact name format there before filing. Utah's Article 9 implementation is actually pretty clean once you know their preferences.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Thanks, that's reassuring. I'll pull up their entity search again and make sure I have the name exactly right.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Also make sure the entity is in good standing while you're checking. Utah sometimes has issues with filings against entities that aren't current on their annual reports.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
•Good point about the good standing status. That's caught me before in other states.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
One more thing to check - make sure you're using the right secured party information too. Utah requires complete addresses and sometimes rejects filings for incomplete secured party details. Article 9 gives states some flexibility on formatting requirements.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•I think that part is correct but I'll double-check. The lender's information should be straightforward.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•Yeah, secured party info is usually easier than debtor names but Utah likes complete addresses with zip+4 codes when possible.
0 coins
Nia Williams
Actually had a similar situation last week where I kept getting Utah rejections. Ended up using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier to cross-check all my documents. Found a tiny discrepancy in how I had formatted the LLC designation that I never would have caught manually. Filed clean after that. For deals this size, the small cost is worth avoiding the delays.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•That's exactly what I'm worried about - missing some tiny formatting issue that keeps causing rejections. I'll look into that tool.
0 coins
Nia Williams
•Yeah it's pretty quick, you just upload your PDFs and it flags potential issues. Beats going back and forth with the state filing office.
0 coins
Luca Ricci
Utah's UCC Article 9 compliance is actually better than a lot of states once you get the hang of it. Their online portal is decent and rejections usually come back quickly so you're not waiting weeks to find out about problems. The key is just being super precise with the debtor name formatting.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•That's true, at least I found out about the rejection quickly. Some states take forever to process.
0 coins
Luca Ricci
•Exactly. Utah typically processes within 24-48 hours which is pretty good for government work.
0 coins
Aisha Mohammed
•Much better than states that take weeks just to tell you there's a problem.
0 coins