UCC search Massachusetts - debtor name variations causing filing gaps
Running into a nightmare situation with our Massachusetts UCC search results. We've been doing quarterly lien searches for portfolio monitoring and keep finding discrepancies where our internal records show active UCC-1 filings but the Massachusetts SOS search isn't pulling them up consistently. The issue seems to be debtor name variations - for example, we have "ABC Manufacturing LLC" on file but the search only finds results under "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (with the comma). This is creating serious gaps in our lien monitoring process and I'm worried we're missing critical continuation deadlines or amendment filings. Has anyone else dealt with Massachusetts-specific search quirks? The portal seems super sensitive to punctuation and abbreviations. Need to figure out if this is a system issue or if we need to completely overhaul our search methodology. Any insights on best practices for comprehensive Massachusetts UCC searches would be hugely appreciated.
32 comments
Join the conversation
Zara Malik
Massachusetts is definitely one of the pickier states for exact name matching. You're right about the punctuation sensitivity - even periods after LLC can throw off results. I usually run multiple search variations for each debtor: with/without commas, periods, different abbreviation styles (LLC vs L.L.C. vs Limited Liability Company). It's tedious but catches stuff the single search misses.
0 coins
Luca Greco
•This is exactly why I keep spreadsheets with every possible name variation for our debtors. Massachusetts system doesn't seem to have fuzzy matching like some other states.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•Wait, you're telling me "ABC Manufacturing LLC" and "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" would be treated as different entities? That's insane for a state filing system in 2025.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
Had this exact problem last month with a client's portfolio review. Missed three active UCC-1s because of comma/period variations in debtor names. What saved me was uploading all our charter documents and UCC filings to Certana.ai's verification tool - it automatically cross-checked the debtor names across all documents and flagged the inconsistencies. Found discrepancies I never would have caught manually comparing Massachusetts search results to our loan files.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
•How does that tool handle the Massachusetts-specific search issues? Does it run multiple name variations automatically?
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•It doesn't search the state system directly, but it compares your charter docs to your UCC filings and highlights any name mismatches. So if your corporate charter shows "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" but your UCC-1 was filed under "ABC Manufacturing LLC", it flags that discrepancy. Then you know to search both variations in Massachusetts.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
The Massachusetts UCC search portal has been problematic for years. Beyond the name sensitivity, I've noticed it sometimes doesn't return results for recently filed documents even after the standard processing delays. Are you searching by both debtor name AND filing number when available? Sometimes the filing number search pulls up records that name searches miss.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•I've been primarily doing name searches since we're monitoring multiple debtors. Filing number searches would work for specific lookups but not efficient for portfolio-wide monitoring.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•For portfolio monitoring, you might want to consider setting up saved searches for each debtor with multiple name variations. Pain to set up initially but saves time on quarterly reviews.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
This is driving me crazy too! I spent 3 hours last week trying to find a UCC-3 continuation that I KNEW was filed because I had the confirmation receipt. Turns out the debtor name on the continuation had a slight variation from the original UCC-1. Massachusetts really needs to update their search algorithms.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•Did you find it eventually? What was the name variation?
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Original UCC-1 was filed under "Boston Tech Solutions Inc" but the continuation was filed as "Boston Tech Solutions, Inc." - just that one comma difference. Had to try like 8 different search combinations.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•That's exactly the kind of thing that makes me paranoid about missing important filings. One tiny punctuation difference and suddenly you can't find critical documents.
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
Pro tip from someone who's been doing Massachusetts UCC work for 15+ years: always search without any punctuation first, then add it back. So start with "ABC Manufacturing LLC" (no commas, periods), then try "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" then "ABC Manufacturing L.L.C." The system treats each as completely different entities which is ridiculous but that's what we're working with.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•That's a solid strategy. Do you also try different entity type abbreviations? Like searching for both "Corporation" and "Corp"?
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
•Absolutely. Inc, Inc., Incorporated, Corp, Corp., Corporation, LLC, L.L.C., Limited Liability Company - I search them all for important debtors. Time consuming but necessary in Massachusetts.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
I wonder if this is partly why so many continuation filings seem to get missed. If lenders are searching under slightly different name variations, they might not even realize their UCC-1 is approaching the 5-year mark.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•That's a terrifying thought. Imagine having a perfectly valid security interest lapse because you couldn't find your own filing to continue it.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•This is why I always keep detailed records of our exact filing names and numbers. Can't rely on the search function to find everything.
0 coins
Amara Eze
Has anyone tried contacting the Massachusetts Secretary of State office about improving the search functionality? This seems like something that could be fixed with better programming.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
•I've submitted feedback through their portal but never heard back. The system has been like this for years so I'm not holding my breath for improvements.
0 coins
NeonNomad
•Government IT upgrades move at glacial pace. We're probably stuck with this system for the foreseeable future.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai for document consistency checks before I even start my Massachusetts searches. Upload the charter and UCC docs, get a report of any name discrepancies, then I know exactly which variations to search for in the state system. Saves me from the guessing game of trying random punctuation combinations.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Does it work with Massachusetts-specific formatting requirements? Some states have weird quirks about how names should be formatted on UCC forms.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•It flags discrepancies between any documents you upload, regardless of state. So if your Massachusetts UCC-1 has the debtor name formatted differently than the charter, it'll catch that. Then you know both versions to search for.
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
This thread is making me realize I probably need to audit all our Massachusetts filings. We've been doing basic name searches and might have missed stuff due to these variations.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•Better to find out now than during a foreclosure when you discover your UCC-1 can't be located in the public records.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Exactly. The time investment in thorough searching is worth it compared to the risk of an unenforceable security interest.
0 coins
CyberSiren
I've been burned by this exact issue. Had a UCC-1 that I couldn't find during a routine search, spent days thinking it wasn't filed properly. Turns out the debtor name had an extra space between words that I wasn't including in my searches. Massachusetts system is incredibly literal about exact matches.
0 coins
Miguel Alvarez
•Extra spaces too? This is getting ridiculous. How are we supposed to account for every possible typo or formatting variation?
0 coins
CyberSiren
•That's why I keep copies of everything. The search system is unreliable so I maintain my own database of what we've filed and when.
0 coins
Zainab Yusuf
•Smart approach. Can't trust the state search to be comprehensive given all these sensitivity issues.
0 coins