UCC filing rejected - security agreement id number mismatch with debtor records
Filed a UCC-1 last week for equipment financing deal and it got rejected by the SOS office. The rejection notice says 'security agreement identification number does not correspond with debtor information on file.' I double-checked everything - debtor name matches exactly, collateral description is proper, but I'm stumped on this security agreement id issue. The loan docs reference agreement #SA-2024-8847 but I'm wondering if there's some formatting requirement I'm missing? This is holding up a $450K equipment loan and the borrower is getting anxious. Has anyone dealt with this specific rejection reason before?
35 comments
Join the conversation
Sophia Nguyen
I've seen this before - usually it's not about the format of your security agreement number itself. The issue is often that the debtor's legal name on your UCC doesn't exactly match what's in their business registration with the state. Even small differences like 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' or missing middle initials can cause this rejection.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
•This is exactly right. I learned this the hard way on a $300K filing last year. Had to pull the exact business entity info from the Secretary of State database to match perfectly.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
•Wait so the security agreement ID number isn't actually the problem? That's confusing messaging from the SOS office then.
0 coins
Maya Patel
Check your debtor's articles of incorporation or organization docs. The legal name there needs to match your UCC-1 filing exactly, character for character. Also verify you're using the right entity type suffix.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Good point about entity suffixes. I once had a rejection because I used 'Corp.' instead of 'Corporation' - such a pain for something so minor.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
•How do you quickly verify the exact legal name format without having to dig through old incorporation papers?
0 coins
Ava Kim
•Most states have online business entity search tools on their SOS websites. Search by the business name and it'll show you the exact registered format.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
I had this exact same rejection code last month and it turned out my security agreement reference number was fine - the real issue was a small typo in the debtor's middle initial. For what it's worth, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after that mess. You can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 together and it cross-checks all the names and numbers automatically. Caught three mismatches I would have missed on my next filing.
0 coins
Layla Mendes
•Never heard of Certana.ai - does it actually work well for catching these name consistency issues?
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
•Yeah it's pretty solid. You just upload PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies between documents. Saved me from another rejection for sure.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING!!! The rejection reasons from state offices are always vague and unhelpful. 'Security agreement id doesn't correspond' could mean literally anything. Why can't they just tell us exactly what's wrong?
0 coins
Aria Park
•I feel your pain. The whole UCC system seems designed to create confusion and extra work.
0 coins
Noah Ali
•At least you got a specific rejection code. Last time mine just said 'filing deficient' with no explanation.
0 coins
Chloe Boulanger
•The state offices are probably understaffed and overworked. Still annoying though when you have deals waiting.
0 coins
James Martinez
Before you refile, also double-check that your security agreement date matches what you put on the UCC-1. Sometimes the rejection is about date inconsistencies rather than the actual ID number format.
0 coins
Olivia Harris
•Good catch. I've seen filings rejected when the security agreement was dated after the UCC filing date, which doesn't make sense legally.
0 coins
Alexander Zeus
•Wait, the security agreement has to be dated before the UCC filing? I thought they could be the same date.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•They can be the same date, but the security agreement can't be dated in the future relative to when you file the UCC. That would create a priority issue.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
For $450K deal I'd definitely get this sorted quickly. Pull up the debtor's exact legal name from state records, compare it character by character to your UCC draft, and refile ASAP. The longer you wait the more questions you'll get from your borrower.
0 coins
Drake
•Absolutely. Time is money on these deals and borrowers start getting nervous when filings get delayed.
0 coins
Sarah Jones
•Is there any way to expedite the refiling process or do you just have to wait in the normal queue again?
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
•Most states offer expedited processing for an extra fee. Usually worth it for large commercial deals like this one.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
I actually just went through something similar and used one of those document checking services someone mentioned earlier - Certana.ai I think? It compared my security agreement against the UCC-1 and flagged that I had the debtor listed as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' on one document and 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' on the other. Such a tiny difference but apparently enough to cause rejection.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
•That comma placement can really cause rejections? Seems like the system should be smart enough to handle minor punctuation differences.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•You'd think so but computer systems are literal. They don't interpret - they just match exactly or they don't.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
Just to clarify - when you say security agreement ID number, are you talking about an internal reference number you assigned or something that should match a state database? Because internal reference numbers shouldn't matter for UCC filing acceptance.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
•It's our internal reference number SA-2024-8847. I thought maybe there was some state requirement about the format but sounds like that's not the actual issue based on other responses here.
0 coins
Amara Torres
•Right, internal reference numbers are just for your own tracking. The rejection is almost certainly about debtor name formatting.
0 coins
Olivia Van-Cleve
Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar rejection and want to know what the actual fix was.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•Same here - these vague rejection codes are the worst part of UCC filings.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
•I keep a spreadsheet of rejection codes and what actually fixed them. Helps avoid repeating the same mistakes.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
Pro tip: before refiling anything major, run your documents through a verification check. I learned about Certana.ai from this forum actually and now I upload both the security agreement and UCC-1 before submitting to catch any name or number mismatches. Takes 2 minutes and prevents these headaches.
0 coins
Dominic Green
•How much does something like that cost? Might be worth it to avoid rejection delays.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
•For commercial deals like this one, any tool that prevents filing delays is probably worth the investment.
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
•I'm going to look into this too. Manual document comparison is tedious and error-prone.
0 coins