UCC filing rejected - secretary of state colorado ucc portal showing weird errors
Has anyone dealt with the Colorado Secretary of State UCC system lately? I'm trying to file a UCC-1 for equipment financing on a construction company and keep getting rejection notices that don't make sense. The debtor name is exactly as it appears on their articles of incorporation but the system keeps saying there's a 'formatting issue' with no specifics. This is holding up a $180K equipment loan and my client's getting frustrated. The collateral description follows the standard format we always use (2024 Caterpillar 320 Excavator, Serial #CAT0320GC123456, located at 1234 Industrial Blvd, Denver CO 80205) but something's not right. Anyone know if Colorado changed their debtor name requirements recently? I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and never seen this.
38 comments
Join the conversation
Fatima Al-Rashid
Colorado's system has been glitchy lately. Are you using the exact legal name from the Secretary of State database? Sometimes there are hidden characters or spacing issues that cause rejections even when it looks identical.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•I copied it directly from their business entity search results. Could there be some kind of encoding problem when I paste it in?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
•Yes absolutely. Try typing it manually instead of copy/paste. I've seen that fix similar issues with other state systems.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
ugh the colorado system is THE WORST. I spent 3 hours last week trying to file a continuation and it kept timing out. Have you tried calling their UCC division directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what's wrong.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•I tried calling but got put on hold for 45 minutes before hanging up. This is ridiculous for something that should be straightforward.
0 coins
Aaliyah Jackson
•The hold times are insane. I usually call right when they open at 8am to avoid the worst of it.
0 coins
KylieRose
I had a similar issue with Colorado rejections last month. Turned out the problem was in my collateral description - apparently they're stricter about serial number formatting now. But honestly, what saved me was using Certana.ai's document checker. I uploaded my UCC-1 draft and it immediately flagged that my debtor name had an extra space that wasn't visible. The tool cross-checks everything against the entity records and catches these tiny inconsistencies that cause rejections.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Really? How does that work exactly? Do you just upload the PDF?
0 coins
KylieRose
•Yep, super easy. Upload your charter docs and UCC-1, and it verifies everything matches up properly. Caught 3 issues in my filing that would have caused rejections.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•That actually sounds useful. I've wasted so much time on rejected filings that could have been caught upfront.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
Check if your debtor is an LLC vs corporation. Colorado has different formatting requirements for entity types. LLC names need to include the full designation, not just 'LLC' - has to be 'Limited Liability Company' in some cases.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•It's a corporation, so it should be 'Corporation' or 'Corp.' right? The articles say 'XYZ Construction Corporation' and that's what I used.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
•That should be fine for corporations. The LLC rule is more strict. Have you tried using 'Corp.' instead of 'Corporation'?
0 coins
Liam Murphy
•Actually Colorado prefers the full word 'Corporation' in my experience. I'd stick with what's on the articles.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
Are you sure you're using the current forms? Colorado updated their UCC-1 form in early 2024 and the old version gets auto-rejected now.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•I downloaded it fresh from their website last week. Should be the current version but maybe I'll double-check.
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
•Good catch. The form version is usually in tiny print at the bottom. Make sure it says 2024 revision.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
This is exactly why I switched to using verification tools before submitting anything. Got burned too many times by these mysterious rejections. The Certana system actually lets you upload multiple documents and checks them against each other - super helpful for catching name mismatches between corporate records and UCC forms.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
•How long does the verification take? Is it instant or do you wait for results?
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Pretty much instant. Upload your docs and it shows you any inconsistencies right away. Way faster than waiting for rejection notices.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
Colorado has been having issues with their system integration since they upgraded last year. Sometimes submissions get stuck in processing limbo. Have you checked the filing status separately from the rejection notice?
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•The status just shows 'Rejected' with a generic error message. No details about what specifically failed.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
•That's frustrating. The error messages used to be more specific. Sounds like their system upgrade made things worse instead of better.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
•Typical government IT project. Spend millions to make things more confusing.
0 coins
LilMama23
Try comparing your filing against a successful one if you have any recent Colorado UCC-1s. Sometimes the issue is subtle formatting that's hard to spot.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Good idea. I'll pull up my last successful Colorado filing and compare line by line.
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
•Make sure to check the address formatting too. Colorado can be picky about abbreviations vs full words.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
Have you tried reaching out to other attorneys who file regularly in Colorado? Sometimes the local bar association has informal tips about system quirks that aren't documented anywhere.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•That's not a bad idea. I should check if there's a Colorado secured transactions practice group.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•The Denver Bar Association usually has a commercial law section that deals with UCC stuff regularly.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
This thread convinced me to try that Certana document checker mentioned earlier. Just uploaded my problem filing and wow - it found the issue immediately. Had a non-printing character in my debtor name that was invisible but causing rejections. Would have taken me hours to figure that out manually.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Seriously? That's exactly the kind of thing that's been driving me crazy. I'm definitely going to try that.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
•Yeah, it's pretty slick. Shows you exactly where the problems are and suggests fixes. Saved me a lot of headache.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Welcome to the club! Once you start using verification tools you wonder how you ever filed without them.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
UPDATE: Found the issue! It was exactly what some of you suggested - there was an invisible character in the debtor name that I couldn't see. Used the document verification tool and it highlighted the problem immediately. Resubmitted with the clean name and it went through. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about the verification tools. Definitely adding that to my workflow going forward.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
•Glad you got it sorted! Those invisible characters are the worst - you can stare at the name for hours and never see the problem.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
•Great news! Always satisfying when a filing mystery gets solved. Your client must be relieved too.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Perfect example of why document verification is so valuable. Catches these technical issues that would otherwise waste days.
0 coins