UCC chattel paper classification causing filing delays - need guidance
Running into issues with our UCC chattel paper filings and wondering if anyone else has dealt with this mess. We're handling equipment financing for a construction company and the debtor keeps changing their legal name structure (went from LLC to Corp back to LLC in 18 months). The chattel paper involves heavy machinery leases that were assigned to us, but now we're getting rejections on our UCC-1 continuations because the SOS system can't match the debtor names properly. The original chattel paper documentation shows one entity name, our UCC-1 shows another version, and the current business registration shows a third variation. This is holding up a $2.8M credit facility and we're running up against the 5-year continuation deadline. Has anyone successfully navigated UCC chattel paper filings when the debtor entity keeps morphing? The collateral description references specific equipment serial numbers but I'm worried about the name matching issues voiding our perfected security interest.
42 comments
Join the conversation
Everett Tutum
Oh man, chattel paper name matching is the absolute worst part of UCC filings. I've seen lenders lose their security interests because of exactly this type of debtor name inconsistency. You need to get the exact legal name that's currently registered with the state and file a UCC-3 amendment ASAP to correct the debtor name before your continuation deadline hits.
0 coins
Sunny Wang
•This is why I always recommend running a business entity search before any UCC filing. The chattel paper might be valid but if your UCC-1 has the wrong debtor name, you're essentially unsecured.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•We did run the entity search but this company literally changed names three times in 18 months. The chattel paper predates all these changes so we're trying to figure out which name to use for the continuation.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
Had a similar situation last year with chattel paper on a fleet lease. The key is understanding that your UCC filing needs to match the current debtor name, not necessarily what's on the original chattel paper. File the continuation with the current legal name and include a UCC-3 amendment that references the previous filings.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•So we can file the continuation with the new name even though our original UCC-1 used the old name? Won't that create a gap in our perfection?
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
•No gap if you do it right. The UCC-3 amendment creates the connection between the old and new filings. Just make sure you reference the original file number in your continuation.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
•I'd be careful about assuming there's no gap. Some states are really strict about name matching for chattel paper. Better to get legal advice on this one.
0 coins
Melissa Lin
We use Certana.ai for exactly these types of UCC chattel paper verification issues. You can upload your original chattel paper documents along with your UCC-1 and any amendments, and it instantly checks for name inconsistencies and document alignment. Saved us from a major filing error last month when we were dealing with similar debtor name changes on equipment financing.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•Interesting, does it actually catch the name variations or just flag obvious mismatches? Our situation has like 3 different versions of essentially the same company name.
0 coins
Melissa Lin
•It caught variations like 'ABC Construction LLC' vs 'ABC Construction Company LLC' vs 'ABC Construction Co.' - stuff that would definitely cause filing rejections. The PDF upload makes it really easy to cross-check everything.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
This is exactly why chattel paper financing is such a headache!! The UCC system wasn't really designed for these complex assignment scenarios where the debtor keeps changing. Are you sure you even need a continuation or should you be filing a new UCC-1 with the current debtor name?
0 coins
Everett Tutum
•No, definitely need the continuation to maintain the original priority date. Filing a new UCC-1 would put them behind any other creditors who filed in the meantime.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
•Right, forgot about the priority issue. This whole chattel paper assignment thing just makes everything 10x more complicated.
0 coins
Romeo Quest
Check your state's specific rules on chattel paper and debtor name changes. Some states have safe harbors if you can show continuous business operations even with name changes. Also make sure your collateral description in the continuation matches what's in your chattel paper - serial numbers, model numbers, everything.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•The collateral descriptions match perfectly, it's just the debtor name that's causing issues. We're in a state that's pretty strict about exact name matching.
0 coins
Romeo Quest
•Then you definitely need that UCC-3 amendment strategy. Can't mess around with name matching in strict states.
0 coins
Val Rossi
•What state are you in? Some states have specific guidance on chattel paper name matching that might help.
0 coins
Eve Freeman
I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and chattel paper assignments are always the trickiest. The fact that you're dealing with equipment financing makes it even more complex because the serial numbers create additional matching requirements. You absolutely cannot let that 5-year deadline pass or you'll lose your perfected status.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•That's what we're worried about. We've got maybe 3 weeks before the deadline and the SOS office is taking forever to process amendments.
0 coins
Eve Freeman
•File the continuation immediately with the current debtor name and worry about the amendment after. Better to have something on file than to miss the deadline completely.
0 coins
Clarissa Flair
•Actually disagree here - if the name is wrong on the continuation, it might not be effective. Better to get the amendment filed first.
0 coins
Caden Turner
We had a chattel paper nightmare last year - equipment lease assignments with multiple name changes and the original lessor went bankrupt. Ended up having to file UCC-3 amendments for every single name variation to make sure we maintained our security interest. Cost us probably $500 in filing fees but better than losing a $1.2M position.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•How many amendments did you have to file? We're looking at potentially 3 different name variations.
0 coins
Caden Turner
•We filed 4 amendments total - one for each name change plus one correcting a typo we found in the original filing. The SOS office was actually helpful once we explained the situation.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
This is why I hate chattel paper deals. Too many moving parts and the UCC system treats them like regular secured transactions when they're totally different. Have you considered whether the assignment was even properly perfected in the first place?
0 coins
Aria Khan
•The assignment looks clean - we have all the proper documentation and the original UCC-1 was filed correctly. It's just the subsequent name changes that are causing problems.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•Fair enough. Just seen too many deals where people assume the assignment was perfect when there were issues from day one.
0 coins
Harmony Love
•Good point about checking the original assignment. Chattel paper assignments can be tricky if the assignor didn't have proper rights.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
Try running the debtor name variations through Certana.ai's document checker - I used it recently for a similar chattel paper issue where we had inconsistent entity names across multiple UCC filings. It flagged all the mismatches and helped us figure out exactly which amendments we needed to file. Made the whole process much cleaner.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•How does it handle chattel paper specifically? Does it understand the assignment relationship or just check names?
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
•It checks document consistency across all your uploads - so if you upload the chattel paper, original UCC-1, and proposed amendments, it'll flag any inconsistencies between them. Really helpful for complex situations like yours.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
Whatever you do, don't let that 5-year deadline pass. I've seen lenders lose millions because they thought they had more time on UCC continuations. File something, anything, before the deadline and then sort out the name issues afterward.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•That's the plan - we're filing the continuation this week with the current legal name and then dealing with amendments if needed.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
•Smart move. Better to have a potentially imperfect filing than no filing at all.
0 coins
Everett Tutum
•Exactly. You can always amend later but you can't bring a lapsed UCC back to life.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
Just went through something similar with chattel paper on a medical equipment lease. The key insight our attorney gave us was that the UCC filing needs to match the debtor's current legal status, not what's on the historical chattel paper documents. We filed a continuation with the current name and included a UCC-3 that specifically referenced the original filing number and explained the name evolution.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•Did you have any issues with the SOS office accepting the explanation of the name changes?
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•No issues at all. We included a brief explanation in the amendment about the corporate restructuring and referenced the business entity filing numbers. Made it clear we were dealing with the same debtor entity.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•That's a good approach. The key is showing continuity of the business entity even through the name changes.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
Used Certana.ai's verification tool for a chattel paper situation last month - uploaded our lease documents and UCC filings and it immediately caught a name discrepancy we missed. Probably saved us from a filing rejection and definitely saved hours of manual document review. For complex chattel paper deals, having that automated cross-check is invaluable.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•At this point I think we need every tool we can get. The manual review process is taking forever and we're running out of time.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
•Yeah, the time savings alone makes it worth it. Plus you get that confidence that all your documents are aligned before you submit anything.
0 coins