< Back to UCC Document Community

Summer Green

UCC 9-610 disposition notice requirements - anyone else confused by timing?

I'm handling a commercial loan default situation and need to understand UCC 9-610 disposition notice requirements. The borrower defaulted on their equipment financing agreement three months ago, and we're preparing to dispose of the collateral (manufacturing equipment valued around $180K). I've read through 9-610 but I'm getting conflicting information about the timing requirements for sending notice to the debtor and other secured parties. Some sources say 10 days minimum, others mention reasonable time. We have a UCC-1 filed but there's also a junior lien holder who filed after us. Do I need to send notice to both? And what constitutes 'commercially reasonable' disposal methods for specialized manufacturing equipment? I don't want to mess this up since the borrower is already threatening legal action. Any guidance would be appreciated.

Gael Robinson

•

The timing under 9-610 is actually pretty specific - you need to send reasonable notice, which is generally at least 10 days before the disposition for most situations. But it can vary based on the type of collateral and disposal method. For equipment like yours, authenticated notice to the debtor is mandatory, and yes, you need to notify other secured parties who have filed financing statements covering the same collateral.

0 coins

Wait, is it always 10 days? I thought it was different for different types of collateral. Consumer goods vs equipment vs inventory...

0 coins

Gael Robinson

•

You're right to question that - the UCC doesn't specify an exact number of days. It just says 'reasonable time' which courts have generally interpreted as at least 10 days for most commercial situations. Consumer transactions have different requirements under 9-614.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

Commercially reasonable disposal is key here. For specialized manufacturing equipment, you'll want to consider industry-standard methods. Private sale to someone in the same industry, auction through equipment dealers, or listing with specialized equipment brokers. Document everything - how you determined value, what methods you considered, why you chose your approach.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

That's helpful. We were thinking about going through an equipment auction house that specializes in manufacturing equipment. Would that typically satisfy the commercially reasonable requirement?

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

Yes, using a reputable auction house that specializes in your type of equipment is generally considered commercially reasonable. Just make sure they're established in the industry and can demonstrate they'll reach appropriate buyers.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

I had a similar situation last year and ran into issues because I didn't properly verify all the parties who needed notice. You might want to try Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your UCC-1 and it will cross-check against the filing records to make sure you're not missing any junior lien holders. It caught a filing I missed that would have caused problems later.

0 coins

Liam Duke

•

Don't forget about 9-611 notice to other secured parties! You need to send notice to any secured party that has filed a financing statement covering the same collateral. Check the UCC filing records carefully - there might be more than just that one junior lien holder you mentioned.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

Good point. I know there's at least one other secured party but I should double-check the records. Is there a standard form for the notice or can I draft my own?

0 coins

Liam Duke

•

No standard form required, but the notice must be authenticated and include specific information per 9-613: intent to dispose, debtor's right to accounting, time/place of disposition if it's a public sale, or reasonable time for private sale.

0 coins

Manny Lark

•

Actually had to deal with this exact scenario 6 months ago. The verification process is tedious but critical. I ended up using Certana.ai to upload all our UCC documents and it automatically flagged inconsistencies between our UCC-1 and the junior lien holder's filing. Saved me from a potential lawsuit when I realized their debtor name was slightly different but still covered the same equipment.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

UGH the notice requirements are such a pain. I swear every state has slightly different interpretations of what constitutes 'reasonable notice' and 'commercially reasonable' disposition. Had a borrower challenge our sale last year claiming 10 days wasn't enough time. Judge sided with us but it was expensive to defend.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

That's exactly why I'm being extra careful. Did you document your reasoning for the 10-day period?

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

Yes, kept detailed records of why we chose that timeframe and what methods we considered. Documentation is everything in these situations.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

Documentation is key, but so is accuracy in your filings. Small errors in debtor names or addresses can void your entire secured position. I've seen it happen too many times.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

For the notice content, make sure you include everything required by 9-613: description of collateral, method of disposition, debtor's right to accounting, contact information for questions. Also include the date/time/place if it's a public sale, or just indicate it's a private sale with reasonable advance notice.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

Perfect, that's exactly the checklist I needed. Should I send certified mail or is regular mail sufficient for the authentication requirement?

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Certified mail is definitely safer for proving delivery, though regular mail can work if you can prove it was sent. Most attorneys recommend certified mail for disposition notices given the stakes involved.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

I always do certified mail return receipt requested. Costs a few extra dollars but the peace of mind is worth it when you're dealing with six-figure equipment.

0 coins

Darren Brooks

•

One thing to watch out for - if there are any consumer goods mixed in with the commercial equipment, you'll need to follow 9-614's stricter notice requirements for those items. Consumer goods get additional protections.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

It's all commercial manufacturing equipment, so I think I'm okay there. But good to know about the consumer goods distinction.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

Yeah, consumer vs commercial makes a huge difference in the notice requirements and debtor protections.

0 coins

Just went through this process myself two months ago. The borrower's attorney tried to claim our notice was inadequate even though we followed 9-610 to the letter. Having your documentation rock-solid is crucial. Also, consider getting an appraisal to support your commercially reasonable determination.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

Good idea on the appraisal. We estimated $180K value but a professional appraisal would definitely strengthen our position.

0 coins

Exactly. Shows you made efforts to maximize recovery, which is part of the commercially reasonable standard.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

Professional appraisal is smart. Also helps if you end up with a deficiency claim against the borrower - shows you acted in good faith to maximize sale proceeds.

0 coins

Make sure your UCC-1 is still effective too. If it's close to its 5-year expiration, you might want to file a continuation statement before proceeding with the disposition. Last thing you want is to discover your lien lapsed during the sale process.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

Good catch. Our UCC-1 was filed in 2022 so we're good for now, but I'll add that to my checklist for future reference.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

Always worth double-checking the filing dates. I've seen deals fall apart because someone forgot about continuation requirements.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

This is where tools like Certana.ai really help - you can upload your UCC-1 and it automatically flags expiration dates and continuation requirements. Saves you from those embarrassing oversights.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

The commercially reasonable standard is really about process, not just outcome. Document your efforts to research market value, consider different disposal methods, and justify your chosen approach. Courts look at whether you acted in good faith and followed reasonable commercial practices.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

That makes sense. So even if we don't get the highest possible price, as long as we can show we followed reasonable commercial practices, we should be okay?

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

Exactly. The UCC doesn't require you to get the absolute highest price, just that you conduct the sale in a commercially reasonable manner. Process matters more than outcome.

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

But you still want to maximize recovery for the debtor's sake and to minimize any deficiency claim. Good process usually leads to better outcomes anyway.

0 coins

Gemma Andrews

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. I feel much more confident about proceeding now. I'll send the notices via certified mail, document everything, and go through the equipment auction house. Hopefully the borrower will be reasonable once they see we're following proper procedures.

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

•

Good luck! Sounds like you've got a solid plan. The key is documentation and following the process correctly.

0 coins

Mae Bennett

•

Hope it goes smoothly. These situations are always stressful but you seem to have all the bases covered.

0 coins

One last thought - if the borrower is already threatening legal action, you might want to give your attorney a heads up about the disposition process. Better to have them involved early than scrambling later.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today