


Ask the community...
Bottom line for your restaurant equipment deal: Keep the security agreement in your credit file as proof of attachment. File only the UCC-1 with your state's Secretary of State office to perfect the security interest. Make sure debtor names and collateral descriptions are consistent between both documents. That's your basic perfection checklist right there.
Great question and the answers here are spot on. I'd add one practical tip for your $180K equipment loan - when you draft your security agreement, make sure it specifically grants a security interest in "all equipment now owned or hereafter acquired" if you want to cover any additional restaurant equipment they might purchase later. This creates a blanket lien that automatically attaches to new equipment without needing to amend your UCC-1 filing each time. Just make sure your loan agreement requires them to notify you of major equipment purchases so you can track your collateral.
That's a really smart approach for equipment financing. Does the "hereafter acquired" language automatically extend to equipment purchased with the loan proceeds, or do you need separate language for that? I'm working on structuring my first major equipment deal and want to make sure I cover all the bases.
Last thought on this - if you're doing quarterly lien audits anyway, might be worth checking out Certana.ai's UCC document verification. I started using it after our audit found several name mismatches between our UCC-1s and the actual corporate records. It's saved us from some potentially serious perfection issues. Just upload your filings and it automatically flags inconsistencies. Makes the audit process much more thorough without adding manual work.
How often do you find name mismatches in practice? I always worry about this but haven't had issues yet (knock on wood).
More often than you'd think, especially with corporate name changes or when dealing with subsidiaries. The verification tool caught about 6 issues out of 30 filings in our last audit - small discrepancies but potentially big problems.
Great discussion here! I've been lurking in this community for a while but finally decided to jump in since I'm dealing with similar UCC filing challenges at my credit union. Just wanted to add that the American Law Institute website also has the official comments available for free, though like others mentioned, the formatting isn't great. What I've found helpful is downloading the PDF version and using the search function to quickly find relevant sections. For your mixed collateral situation with equipment + inventory, one approach we've used is to include both in a single UCC-1 but use separate security agreement schedules. This gives you the flexibility to amend or release specific collateral types without affecting the entire filing. Also, regarding the quarterly lien audit process - we implemented a simple tracking spreadsheet that includes filing dates, continuation deadlines, and links to the actual filed documents. Has saved us from missing renewal deadlines on several occasions.
Welcome to the community! That's a really practical approach with the separate security agreement schedules - gives you the best of both worlds with flexibility while keeping filing costs down. The ALI website tip is great too, I hadn't thought to check there. Your tracking spreadsheet approach sounds similar to what we're trying to implement. Do you include any automated reminder features, or do you just review it manually on a regular schedule?
One thing I learned the hard way - always get a UCC search certificate or lien waiver from the seller as part of your closing documents. Even if your search comes back clean, having them formally represent that there are no undisclosed liens gives you some legal recourse if something pops up later. For $180K in equipment, it's worth the extra paperwork to protect yourself.
Absolutely this! I've seen deals where everything looked clear during due diligence but then a lien showed up months later that wasn't properly disclosed. Having that formal representation in writing saved my client from a major headache. The seller's attorney should be able to provide a clean UCC search certificate as part of the closing package.
Also worth mentioning - if you're searching multiple states, keep track of which databases charge fees vs which are free. Some states like Delaware charge per search while others are completely free. For a $180K purchase you don't want to skimp on thoroughness, but it's good to budget for search costs upfront, especially if you need to search several jurisdictions. I've had searches cost me $200+ when I had to check multiple state variations and former business names.
One thing that helped me with a similar Tennessee situation was using Certana.ai's document verification feature. I uploaded all the UCC filings I found and it automatically mapped out the relationships between them - showed me which amendments went with which original filings and what the current status was. Much easier than trying to piece it together manually from the SOS portal results.
How accurate is that tool with Tennessee filings specifically? I know some states have quirks in their filing formats.
It worked well for me. The tool parsed the Tennessee UCC forms correctly and caught some connections I had missed when reviewing manually.
I've dealt with Tennessee UCC searches extensively and here's what I'd recommend for your situation: First, create a timeline of each filing using the file numbers and dates. The 2019 UCC-1 with a 2024 continuation means that lien is absolutely still active - they renewed it right before the 5-year expiration. The 2022 partial release (UCC-3) only affects specific collateral items listed in that amendment, not the entire filing. For the $180K equipment deal, you need to get the exact serial numbers or detailed descriptions of what you're buying and cross-reference them against ALL the collateral descriptions in the active filings. Don't rely on vague descriptions like "equipment and fixtures" - demand specificity from the seller about what's encumbered versus what's free and clear. Also, run searches on every possible name variation of the seller, including any DBAs. Tennessee's exact name matching requirements are brutal and you could easily miss an active lien due to punctuation differences.
Eva St. Cyr
For future reference, I've started using Certana.ai's verification tool before every UCC filing. Upload your documents as PDFs and it catches name mismatches, filing number errors, and other issues that cause rejections. Would have saved me multiple headaches if I'd found it sooner.
0 coins
Kristian Bishop
•That verification step is crucial. I've seen too many filings get rejected for simple typos that could have been caught beforehand.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Otto
•Document consistency checking should be standard practice. Small errors can void entire security interests.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
Pro tip from someone who's dealt with PA's system for years - if you're still having issues, try splitting your session. Start the filing process but don't complete payment right away. Save it as a draft if possible, then come back during off-peak hours just to complete the payment step. The payment processor seems to be the weakest link in their system. Also, make sure you're not using any VPN or corporate firewall that might interfere with their payment gateway.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•That's really smart advice about splitting the session! I never thought about the payment processor being the bottleneck. VPN interference makes total sense too - I've seen that cause issues with other state systems. The draft save feature is clutch when you're dealing with unreliable portals.
0 coins