Need UCC-1 financing statement example with proper debtor name format
I'm preparing my first UCC-1 filing for a client's equipment loan and getting confused about the debtor name section. The borrower is "Johnson & Sons Construction LLC" but I've seen different formatting examples online. Some show the full name exactly as it appears on the articles of incorporation, others abbreviate "Limited Liability Company" to "LLC". The collateral is heavy construction equipment (excavators, bulldozers) worth about $340,000. I don't want this rejected because of a name mismatch. Can someone share a proper UCC-1 financing statement example showing how to handle LLC names correctly? Also wondering if I need to include the state of organization in the debtor name field or if that goes elsewhere. This is for filing in the state where the equipment will be located, not where the LLC was formed.
36 comments


Chloe Martin
The exact legal name is crucial - use exactly what's on the articles of incorporation. For "Johnson & Sons Construction LLC" you'd use that full name, don't abbreviate LLC to "Limited Liability Company" or vice versa. The state of organization goes in a separate field, not in the debtor name itself.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
•This is correct. I learned this the hard way when my filing got rejected because I wrote out "Limited Liability Company" when the charter just said "LLC".
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Wait, but what if the charter says "Limited Liability Company" and you put "LLC"? Is that also a rejection?
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Yes, any deviation from the exact legal name can cause rejection. The filing system is very strict about name matching.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
For equipment financing like yours, make sure your collateral description is specific enough. "Heavy construction equipment" might be too vague. List the specific types and maybe include serial numbers if you have them available.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Good point about the collateral description. I have the equipment list with serial numbers, just wasn't sure how detailed to get in the UCC-1.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
•More detail is usually better than less. I've seen filings where vague descriptions caused problems later during enforcement.
0 coins
StarStrider
Had a similar situation last month with a client's LLC name. After getting one rejection, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You just upload the charter and your draft UCC-1 as PDFs, and it automatically cross-checks the debtor names to make sure they match exactly. Saved me from another rejection.
0 coins
AstroAce
•That sounds helpful. Did it catch anything else besides the name formatting?
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yeah, it also flagged that I had the wrong organizational ID number. The tool compared everything between the documents and highlighted the discrepancies.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•I might try that. I've been manually comparing documents but it's easy to miss small differences.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
Don't forget to check if your state requires the organizational ID number in addition to the exact legal name. Some states are more strict about this than others.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Good reminder. I'll check the state requirements for organizational ID numbers.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•In my experience, including the org ID even when not required helps prevent potential issues down the line.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
ugh why is this so complicated?? I just want to file a simple lien and there's like 50 different rules about names and numbers
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•I know it seems overwhelming but getting it right the first time saves a lot of headaches later. The rules exist to make sure the public record is clear and searchable.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•I guess but it feels like the system is designed to trip you up on technicalities
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
For what it's worth, most state filing offices have example forms on their websites. They're usually pretty good templates to follow for formatting.
0 coins
AstroAce
•I did look at the state examples but they were pretty basic. Nothing showing how to handle the specific LLC name formatting question I had.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•True, the examples are often too simplified for real-world scenarios.
0 coins
NeonNova
•That's why I always double-check everything against the actual charter documents before filing.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
Just to add another perspective - I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and the name exactness rule has gotten stricter over time. Used to be more forgiving but now even punctuation differences can cause rejections.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•Really? Even punctuation? That seems excessive.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Yep. Had a filing rejected because the charter had a period after "Inc." and I forgot the period in my UCC-1. Now I'm super careful about every character.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•This is exactly why I started using verification tools. Too many small details to track manually.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
Make sure you're filing in the right state too. For LLCs it's the state of organization, not where the collateral is located (unless it's fixtures).
0 coins
AstroAce
•Wait, I thought for equipment I file where the equipment is located? This is a construction company so the equipment moves around different job sites.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
•No, for LLCs you always file where the LLC was organized, regardless of where the collateral is. The location rule applies to individuals and some other entity types.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•This is correct. State of organization for LLCs, not collateral location.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
I usually call the filing office if I have any doubts about formatting. Sometimes they can give you guidance over the phone before you submit.
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
•That's good advice but in my experience they usually just refer you back to the instructions and say they can't give legal advice.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
•Fair point. Hit or miss depending on who answers.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
One more thing about your collateral description - since it's construction equipment that moves between job sites, you might want to be clear that it's not fixtures. Don't want any confusion about whether this should be a fixture filing.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Good point. The equipment definitely isn't attached to any real estate, it's mobile equipment that moves to different projects.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•Yeah, describe it as "mobile construction equipment" or similar to make it clear it's not fixtures.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
•Exactly. Better to be explicit about mobility than risk someone thinking it needs a fixture filing.
0 coins