Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Axel Bourke
I had similar issues last year. Turned out the debtor had recently amended their articles of incorporation and the name on file with the state was slightly different than what was on their older documents I was using. Maybe check if your debtor has made any recent corporate changes?
Axel Bourke
•Exactly. The certificate should show their exact current legal name as it appears in state records.
Aidan Percy
•This happened to us too. The borrower had dropped 'Incorporated' and just used 'Inc' but we filed under the old format.
Keep us posted on what you find out. I'm dealing with a similar situation in Michigan right now and wondering if it's a systemic issue or just bad luck.
Mary Bates
•Will do. Hopefully it's just a processing delay and not something more serious.
Fingers crossed for both of us!
Join the conversation
The real issue is that Utah's UCC search Utah system doesn't have good filters for rejection status. Other states at least let you filter out rejected or terminated filings, but Utah shows everything mixed together.
Honorah King
•Exactly! And their search interface is from like 2005. Desperately needs an update.
Oliver Brown
•At least it's better than trying to search paper records. But yeah, the filtering options are pretty limited.
Mary Bates
Update: I contacted the Utah filing office and they confirmed both filings will remain in search results permanently. They suggested including a note in future financing statements explaining the rejected filing situation. Also found that Certana.ai's document checker immediately identified which filing was valid when I uploaded both PDFs - would have saved me a lot of confusion if I'd used that initially.
Ayla Kumar
•Yeah, Certana.ai's tool is really helpful for this kind of situation. Much faster than trying to decode the state portal's confusing status indicators.
Glad you got clarity on this. Will definitely keep this in mind for future Utah filings.
Join the conversation
KaiEsmeralda
Study tip that worked for me: make flashcards of common WRONG statements about Article 9. Like 'Article 9 covers all types of collateral' (false - excludes real estate mortgages). 'Security agreements must always be in writing' (false - some oral agreements allowed). 'Filing location is always the debtor's state' (false - depends on debtor type). Practice identifying false statements!
KaiEsmeralda
•Financing statements expire after 6' (years false - 5)years '. PMSI priority applies to all collateral types' (equally false - different rules for inventory vs)equipment '. Perfection always requires' (filing false - possession, control, automatic perfection)exist.
Eli Wang
•Good ones! Also 'debtor must sign the financing statement' (false - only security agreement needs debtor authentication, not the UCC-1 filing).
Debra Bai
You got this! The key insight is that false statements usually involve: 1) absolute words like 'always' or 'never' when exceptions exist, 2) including excluded transactions, 3) wrong filing procedures, 4) mixed up priority rules. Article 9 has lots of nuances so broad absolute statements are often false.
Nora Brooks
•Thank you everyone! This has been incredibly helpful. I feel like I have a much better framework for approaching these questions now.
Debra Bai
•Good luck on your exam! Remember - when in doubt, think about the exceptions and exclusions. That's where the false statements usually hide.
Join the conversation
Yara Sayegh
Whatever you decide, make sure you document your reasoning for the name format you choose. If there's any question later about the continuation, you want to show you did due diligence on the debtor name matching.
Good point about documentation. I'll keep detailed notes on which documents I reviewed and why I chose the specific name format.
Yara Sayegh
•Exactly. CYA is important when you're making judgment calls on debtor name variations.
Thanks everyone for the guidance. Going to pull all the actual filing documents first to trace the name change history, then probably use one of those verification tools to double-check my continuation before filing. Better to be thorough than risk a rejection this close to the deadline.
Smart approach. Take your time to get it right rather than rushing and having to refile.
Dylan Cooper
•Let us know how it goes with the verification tool if you try it. Always interested to hear how others are handling these tricky name matching situations.
Ally Tailer
One thing nobody mentioned - make sure your security agreement language matches whatever you put in the UCC-1. I've seen cases where the security agreement covered 'all equipment' but UCC only listed specific items. Creates gaps in coverage.
0 coins
Aliyah Debovski
•Yes, consistency between security agreement and UCC-1 is critical. If they don't match, you might not have the security interest you think you have.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
•This is why I always recommend having everything reviewed before filing. One mistake can void your entire security interest.
0 coins
Finley Garrett
For future reference, when you do get this sorted out, set a reminder for your continuation filing well before the deadline. I've seen too many people lose perfection because they forgot about the 5-year rule and filed continuations too late.
0 coins
Finley Garrett
•Perfect. Most people wait until the last minute and then panic. You're being smart about planning ahead.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•I actually put continuation reminders in my calendar 18 months before they're due. Gives time to deal with any complications.
0 coins