Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
The SBA usually gets the UCC filings right but it's worth double-checking. I've seen cases where they filed against the wrong entity or used an outdated business address. Small errors can cause big problems later if you need to deal with lien releases or subordinations.
Pull a UCC search from your state's filing office about 6 weeks after loan closing. Compare the debtor name, address, and collateral description to your loan documents to make sure everything matches.
This is exactly what Certana.ai automates - you upload your charter and loan docs and it cross-checks everything for discrepancies. Much easier than doing manual comparisons and catches stuff you might miss.
One thing I'd add is to be proactive about understanding how the UCC filing might affect your future borrowing capacity. The SBA's blanket lien can sometimes complicate things when you're trying to get working capital lines or equipment financing down the road. I'd recommend having a conversation with your existing lenders now about the upcoming filing and see if they want to adjust any loan covenants or cross-default provisions. Also, if you're planning that expansion next year, start building relationships with lenders who are comfortable working with SBA-encumbered borrowers - not all banks are equally experienced with subordination agreements and it can save you headaches later.
Diego Flores
•This is really valuable advice, especially about building relationships with lenders who understand SBA subordination. I'm new to all this and hadn't thought about how the UCC filing could complicate future financing. Do you have any recommendations for how to identify which banks are more experienced with SBA-encumbered borrowers? Is this something I should ask directly when shopping for future loans, or are there other ways to tell?
Join the conversation
Thanks everyone - this has been incredibly helpful. Sounds like the consensus is to proceed with the equipment lender filing their own UCC-1 with specific collateral description, rely on the subordination agreement for priority, and not expect the SBA to amend their original filing. I'm going to double-check all our documents for consistency issues before filing to avoid any rejections with this tight timeline.
One last thing - make sure your equipment lender is comfortable with this structure. Some lenders prefer to see clean first priority positions rather than relying on subordination agreements.
Jamal Brown
•Absolutely agree with Freya's point - I'd recommend having a frank conversation with your equipment lender about their comfort level with subordination structures before finalizing everything. Some lenders have internal policies that require first lien positions regardless of subordination agreements, especially for equipment deals. Better to know now if they'll push back on the structure rather than find out at closing.
I'm new to UCC subordination deals but this thread has been incredibly educational. One question I haven't seen addressed - what happens if the equipment gets damaged or destroyed while both liens are in place? Does the subordination agreement typically address insurance proceeds and how they're distributed between the SBA and equipment lender? I'm working on a similar deal and want to make sure we're covering all the bases in our documentation.
Mei Liu
•This insurance thread has been incredibly valuable! As someone just getting into secured transactions, I'm realizing how many moving parts there are beyond just the basic UCC filings. On your question about documentation trails, I'd think requiring borrowers to copy both lenders simultaneously on all insurance correspondence would be essential - creates transparency and prevents any "I didn't know" issues later. For the check endorsement delays, maybe the subordination agreement could include language allowing the equipment lender to deposit the check into an escrow account pending SBA endorsement, so at least the proceeds are secured even if not immediately accessible? And regarding default status affecting distribution - that's a great point that probably needs specific language in the subordination agreement about whether a borrower's default to one lender impacts the other lender's rights to insurance proceeds. This whole discussion really shows why these deals need such careful documentation upfront!
Ravi Sharma
•As someone new to this space, I'm amazed by how thorough this discussion has become! The insurance considerations you've all raised really highlight the complexity of these subordination structures. One practical question that comes to mind - when you're drafting the subordination agreement, do you typically include a matrix or flowchart showing exactly how different scenarios (total loss, partial loss, default by borrower, etc.) would be handled? It seems like having a clear decision tree could prevent a lot of disputes down the road. Also, @Mei Liu makes a great point about escrow arrangements for insurance proceeds - I m'wondering if anyone has experience with using third-party escrow agents versus just having the proceeds held by one of the lenders? Given all the timing and coordination challenges mentioned in this thread, it seems like a neutral third party might help streamline the process.
Join the conversation
Omar Farouk
Update: Finally got through to someone at LoanPal who admitted they've had 'system issues' with their UCC processing. They're supposedly filing all the backed-up terminations this week. Will believe it when I see it on the Delaware SOS website. Thanks everyone for the advice - filing complaints definitely helped escalate this.
AstroAlpha
•System issues for 3 months? That's convenient. At least you got an admission that there's a problem.
Diego Chavez
•Check the Delaware SOS website daily. Sometimes they say they filed but there are errors that cause rejections.
Andre Dubois
I went through something similar with LoanPal last year - took 5 months to get our UCC-3 termination after paying off a $240K equipment loan. What finally worked was sending a demand letter through an attorney threatening to file for damages due to their breach of the loan agreement's 30-day termination clause. Cost us $1,500 in legal fees but we got the termination within a week of them receiving the letter. Also document everything - keep records of every call, email, and delay because if this impacts your refinancing or business operations, you may have grounds for consequential damages. The "system issues" excuse is BS - they just have terrible internal processes and no accountability.
Join the conversation
The practical effect of the UCC's silence is that default provisions have become one of the most heavily negotiated parts of security agreements. Borrowers want narrow definitions with lots of cure rights, lenders want broad definitions with limited cure opportunities. The lack of statutory guidance means everything is on the table for negotiation.
Nora Bennett
•And because there's no statutory fallback, both sides have to be really careful about what they agree to. You're stuck with whatever language you negotiate.
Which is why having tools like Certana.ai to check for consistency and potential issues is so valuable. When you're crafting custom default language, you need all the help you can get to avoid problems.
This thread highlights exactly why I always recommend creating a default provision checklist when drafting security agreements. Since the UCC leaves it completely open, I've found it helpful to categorize defaults into three buckets: (1) payment defaults with specific grace periods, (2) covenant defaults that can typically be cured, and (3) fundamental defaults like bankruptcy or fraud that trigger immediate remedies. The key is being surgical rather than using a sledgehammer approach. I've seen too many deals where overly aggressive default language came back to haunt the lender when they tried to enforce it. Courts may uphold the language technically, but they'll scrutinize your enforcement actions much more carefully if the defaults seem designed to trap borrowers rather than protect legitimate interests.
Lukas Fitzgerald
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly helpful and reassuring! @Jayden Hill, your initial panic is completely relatable - I would have had the exact same reaction getting official paperwork I didn't understand. The timing with your 6-month equipment financing makes this almost certainly legitimate, and it's so reassuring to see how many others have shared nearly identical experiences. What's really valuable is the clear verification process that's emerged here: calling Texas SOS directly, using their search portal, and confirming with your lender. I had no idea UCC filings were standard practice for equipment loans until reading this discussion - it really highlights the gaps in business financial literacy that many of us have. I'm definitely saving this entire thread as a reference guide for when I eventually get business financing. It's amazing how this community has turned what initially seemed like a potential crisis into such a comprehensive learning resource. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences so openly - this is exactly why community discussions are so valuable for those of us still learning the ropes of business financing and documentation!
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•@Lukas Fitzgerald This thread has been such an incredible learning experience! As another newcomer to UCC filings, I m'amazed at how @Jayden Hill s initial'concern has become this comprehensive resource for anyone dealing with unexpected UCC correspondence. The verification steps everyone has outlined are so practical - I had no idea there was a searchable Texas SOS portal until reading through all these responses. What really resonates with me is how this highlights the importance of understanding the complete picture of business loan agreements, not just the payment terms we typically focus on. It s so'reassuring to see how many people have shared virtually identical experiences with equipment financing - really drives home that this is standard business practice, even though it can feel alarming when you re not'prepared for it. I m definitely'bookmarking this discussion for future reference when I pursue business financing. Thanks to this entire community for demonstrating how to turn what seems scary into actionable knowledge!
0 coins
Maya Jackson
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been absolutely incredible for understanding what initially seems like a scary situation! @Jayden Hill, your panic is completely understandable - receiving official paperwork when you don't know what it means is terrifying. But reading through everyone's experiences, your 6-month equipment financing timeline makes this almost certainly legitimate. What I love about this community is how everyone has contributed to create this amazing verification roadmap: call Texas SOS directly, use their search portal, and confirm with your lender. I had no clue UCC filings were standard for equipment loans until this discussion - really shows how much we miss in the fine print of loan agreements! I'm definitely saving this thread as my go-to reference for business financing questions. It's fascinating how something that looks so intimidating is actually just routine paperwork protecting both parties. Thanks to everyone for turning what could have been an isolating experience into such valuable community knowledge!
0 coins