< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security dilemma: Collect early and invest vs waiting until FRA - which strategy wins financially?

I'm trying to decide the best financial strategy for my Social Security benefits. I'm currently 62 and eligible to start collecting, but I keep going back and forth on what makes the most sense. I've been looking at two scenarios: 1) Wait until my Full Retirement Age (67) to collect the full benefit amount 2) Start collecting at 62 (reduced amount), but continue working just as I would in scenario #1. The twist is that I'd bank all the SS money and invest it in an S&P 500 index fund, paying taxes on it along the way. I've heard conflicting advice about what yields better results long-term. I understand I'd take about a 30% reduction by filing early, but that's 5 years of payments I could be investing. For those who've run the numbers or actually done this, what downsides should I be considering for each approach? Are there factors beyond just the math that I should think about? My health is good, and longevity runs in my family if that matters.

Aria Khan

•

This is an excellent question, and one I've helped many people work through. The answer isn't as straightforward as some make it seem. For scenario #1 (waiting until FRA): - Pros: Larger monthly benefit for life (~30% more than early filing) - Cons: Missing 5 years of payments, opportunity cost of those funds For scenario #2 (early filing + investing): - Pros: Money in hand sooner, potential investment growth, flexibility - Cons: Permanently reduced benefit, tax implications, market risk The breakeven point is typically around age 80-82. If you live beyond that, waiting to FRA usually wins. But this assumes average market returns. Some other factors to consider: - Your other income sources and tax situation while working - The earnings test - if you're still working, SSA will withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above $21,240 (2025 limit) - Survivor benefits - if you're married, your spouse's survivor benefit is based on your benefit amount - COLA adjustments apply to your base amount, so larger base = larger COLAs The best strategy really depends on your complete financial picture, not just the SS numbers.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

This is a really thoughtul answer! I'd never considered the survivor benefit angle - that's a huge factor for married couples. One question though - if most of the SS money would be withheld anyway due to the earnings test when continuing to work, doesn't that basically destroy the whole "take early and invest" strategy? You'd only get to invest a portion of the benefit, not the whole thing.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

DON'T DO IT!!! I filed early at 62 thinking I was being smart and now I DEEPLY regret it. The reduction is PERMANENT and they don't tell you how badly it affects you later!!! The monthly check difference is WAY bigger than I expected and gets worse with every COLA increase. And don't forget about Medicare premiums that come out of your SS check - larger check means more left after Medicare!!!! The whole "invest the money" thing sounds good in THEORY but in REALITY you won't do it! Most people end up spending it, trust me. And the market can CRASH right when you need the money. I'm 72 now and would give ANYTHING to go back and wait until my FRA. Don't make my mistake!!!

0 coins

I think this rly depends on the person tho. My dad took SS early and invested all of it, never touched a penny. Now he's 78 and has wayyy more than if he'd waited. But he's super disciplined with money and never panicked during market drops.

0 coins

What you need to understand is there's no perfect answer - the Social Security Administration designed the early vs. FRA vs. delayed credits to be roughly actuarially equivalent based on average life expectancy. However, your specific situation creates some complications: 1. The earnings test will significantly reduce or eliminate your benefits while working before FRA. Any benefits withheld are recalculated at FRA, but this greatly complicates the "take early and invest" strategy. 2. Taxes - if you're still working, up to 85% of your SS benefits could be taxable, reducing the amount available to invest. 3. Market risk - the S&P 500 has historically returned about 10% annually, but that's an average with significant volatility. A market downturn early in retirement can devastate this strategy. 4. For married couples, the higher earner's benefit becomes the survivor benefit, so maximizing the higher earner's benefit provides insurance for the surviving spouse. I'd recommend using one of the specialized SS calculators like Open Social Security or Maximize My Social Security to run your specific numbers, including life expectancy, tax situation, and marital status.

0 coins

Thank you for this detailed response. I hadn't fully considered how the earnings test would affect the "take early and invest" strategy. If most of my benefits would be withheld anyway while working, that really changes the equation. I'm going to look into those calculators you mentioned. Do either of them let you model the earnings test impact specifically?

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

my neighbor started collecting at 62 and he says its the best decision he ever made. says life is too short to wait for money thats yours anyway. he went on a alaska cruise with his first check lol

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Your neighbor's experience is valid, but it's important to recognize this is a personal choice that depends on individual circumstances. The "bird in hand" approach makes sense for some people, especially those with health concerns or immediate financial needs. However, for someone specifically looking to maximize lifetime benefits who expects to live into their 80s or beyond, the math often favors waiting - especially for the higher earner in a married couple.

0 coins

I had a similar dilemma last year. Tried calling SSA for MONTHS to discuss the implications with someone who could look at my specific earnings record. Always got disconnected or waited 3+ hours. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an SSA agent in under 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent was able to run calculations based on my specific work history and showed me that in my particular case, waiting until FRA made more sense because I had some zero earning years that would drop off by working longer. Your situation might be different though.

0 coins

That's really helpful to know about. I've been trying to get through to someone at SSA to ask some specific questions about how the earnings test would apply in my situation, but I keep getting disconnected. I'll check out that service - at this point I just need to talk to someone who can look at my actual record.

0 coins

has anyone run actual numbers on this??? all i see are opinions but what do the REAL calculations show??? I'm in same boat and want to know the math not just what ppl think

0 coins

The math depends entirely on your specific benefit amounts, life expectancy, investment returns, and tax situation. But here's a simplified example: Assume: - $2,000/month at FRA (67) - $1,400/month at 62 (30% reduction) - S&P 500 returns 8% annually after inflation - 25% tax rate on SS benefits By age 80: - FRA strategy: Collected for 13 years = $312,000 - Early strategy: Collected for 18 years, invested at 8% after taxes = ~$432,000 By age 85: - FRA strategy: Collected for 18 years = $432,000 - Early strategy: After 23 years with compounding = ~$518,000 By age 90: - FRA strategy: Collected for 23 years = $552,000 - Early strategy: After 28 years with compounding = ~$612,000 This simplified model suggests early filing + investing wins, BUT it doesn't account for the earnings test while working, which would significantly alter these numbers. It also assumes disciplined investing of 100% of the benefit and no market crashes.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

Is anyone going to mention how the earnings test basically makes this question irrelevant? If you're going to continue working at a decent salary, you WON'T GET your Social Security benefits anyway until you reach FRA. The 2025 earnings limit for people under FRA is $21,240. After that, SSA withholds $1 for every $2 you earn above the limit. So if you're making $71,240+ annually, your entire benefit will be withheld until you reach FRA. Yes, they recalculate your benefit at FRA to give credit for the months benefits were withheld, but this makes the "take early and invest" strategy impossible to execute unless you're only working part-time.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical insight I was looking for! I'm planning to continue with my full-time job until 67, which pays well above that earnings limit. So essentially, I'd be filing early but not actually receiving much (if any) benefit until FRA anyway due to the earnings test. That completely changes my perspective on this decision. Thank you!

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

Dont forget about the STUPID WEP and GPO if you have a pension from non-covered employment!!! THAT will DESTROY your benefit calculations and the SSA reps NEVER mention it until its TOO LATE!!!

0 coins

That's an important consideration, but only applies to people who worked in jobs not covered by Social Security (certain government jobs, railroads, etc.) and earned pensions from that work. For most workers who've spent their careers in Social Security-covered employment, WEP and GPO don't apply. But you're right that anyone with non-covered employment should definitely factor this into their calculations.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

my sister took it early and my brother waited and they both complain all the time so maybe it doesnt matter lol. social security isnt enough money either way these days

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
7,172 users helped today