Social Security DRC confusion - monthly benefit doesn't increase until January despite delaying after FRA
I'm totally confused about my delayed retirement credits (DRCs) and could use some help figuring out the best strategy! My full retirement age is June 2025, but I was planning to delay starting my SS benefits until November 2025 to get some extra money. Here's what's weird - when I check the SSA Retirement Calculator online, it shows my monthly benefit amount in November will be EXACTLY the same as if I start in June. According to the calculator, my benefit doesn't increase at all until January 2026! I always thought we get an extra 2/3 of 1% for each month we delay after FRA. But this makes it look like I'd be giving up 5 months of payments for absolutely no increase? Am I missing something here? Not sure if I should: 1) Just start collecting at my FRA in June 2025 2) Wait until November as planned (but get no increase?) 3) Request retroactive benefits back to my FRA if I do wait 4) Hold off completely until January 2026 when the calculator shows an increase This is a lot of money at stake and I'm really confused about how the DRCs are actually applied to my payments. Any insights would be massively appreciated!
17 comments
Yara Sayegh
You've discovered something important about how Social Security actually processes Delayed Retirement Credits (DRCs). You're right that you earn 2/3 of 1% for each month you delay beyond FRA, but there's a catch in how they're applied. Delayed Retirement Credits are only applied to your benefit amount once per year, in January of the year after you earn them. So even though you're earning DRCs from June-December 2025, they won't actually show up in your payment amount until January 2026. This is why the calculator shows no increase until January - that's the actual SSA policy, even though it's not well publicized. It's one of those quirks in the system that can affect your claiming strategy.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Thank you for explaining! That definitely wasn't clear to me at all. So I'd be earning the DRCs during those months but just not seeing them in my payments right away? Do they at least pay them retroactively in January or are those months just at the lower amount forever?
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
the ssa website is right. my brother went thru this last year. its pretty stupid but thats how they do it. u earn the credits each month but they only add them to ur check in january of next yr. nobody tells u this stuff!
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Thanks for confirming! Really frustrating they don't make this clearer on their website. Did your brother feel like it was still worth waiting those extra months even though the increase didn't show up right away?
0 coins
Paolo Longo
What you're encountering is called the "DRC computation lag" and it's a frustrating but standard part of how SSA operates. Let me break this down carefully: 1) You DO earn DRCs for each month you delay beyond FRA (2/3% per month, or 8% per year) 2) BUT these credits are only processed and added to your benefit amount once per year in January 3) This creates a lag where you've earned the credits but don't see them in your payments yet Financially speaking, there are two main approaches to consider: Option A: If you need the income now, start at FRA or claim retroactively if you've already passed FRA. You won't lose any money you're entitled to either way. Option B: If you can afford to wait until January 2026, you'll get the highest possible monthly amount from the beginning of your benefit period. The total lifetime value depends on your life expectancy and financial needs. There's no one-size-fits-all answer here.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•THIS IS RIDICULOUS!! the ssa takes OUR money for DECADES and then makes us jump through hoops to get what we're OWED!! why should we have to wait for them to "process" increases that we've EARNED?? its OUR money!!! 😡
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
Update: I just called SSA again today and got through to someone after trying for TWO DAYS. They verified what you all are saying - the DRCs accumulate monthly but only get applied to my benefit in January 2026. So frustrating! The agent couldn't really tell me which option was "best" financially, just that it depends on my situation. I'm leaning toward just starting at my FRA in June since waiting until November seems pointless if I don't see any increase until January anyway. Still feels like I'm missing something though...
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Have you tried calculating the actual numbers? If your monthly benefit at FRA is $2,500, waiting from June to January would earn you 7 months of DRCs. That's 7 × (2/3)% = 4.67% increase, making your January benefit about $2,617. So the question is: Would you rather have $2,500 × 7 months = $17,500 in 2025, or permanently receive an extra $117 per month for the rest of your life starting in January 2026? If you live more than 150 months (12.5 years) after January 2026, waiting would give you more money in total. Everyone's situation is different, but running the actual numbers can help make your decision clearer.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•I spent HOURS trying to get someone at Social Security to explain this to me last year. It's so frustrating! I finally had success using Claimyr (claimyr.com) to get through to an agent quickly. They have a service that gets you connected to a real person at SSA in under 20 minutes. Saved me days of busy signals and disconnections. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU Whether you start at FRA or wait, at least you'll be able to talk to someone to confirm your decision. For me, it was worth it to clear up my confusion.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
This scenario comes up frequently, and there's an important nuance many people miss. When you receive your DRCs in January 2026, you'll get the INCREASED amount moving forward, but you WON'T receive retroactive adjustments for the months you received benefits in 2025. In financial terms, consider three options: 1) Start at FRA (June 2025): Receive 7 payments in 2025 at the lower amount, then the regular COLA-adjusted amount in 2026 (no DRCs) 2) Start in November 2025: Receive 2 payments in 2025 at the lower amount, then the DRC-increased amount from January 2026 onward (for 5 months of delay) 3) Wait until January 2026: Receive no payments in 2025, but get the full 7 months of DRCs applied from your first check For most people with average life expectancy, option 1 or 3 makes the most mathematical sense. Option 2 is usually the least favorable from a pure numbers perspective.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Thank you so much for breaking it down like this! This really clarifies my options. I'm leaning toward option 1 now (starting at FRA) since I could use the cash flow this year, and it sounds like option 2 is basically the worst choice. I appreciate everyone's help figuring this out!
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
dont forget about TAXES!! if ur still working while waiting for SS u might end up paying more tax on ur benefits when u do take them. my sister waited and ended up with a higher benefit but got pushed into a higher tax bracket and now pays tax on 85% of her SS, completely wiped out the benefit of waiting!!
0 coins
Paolo Longo
•This is partially correct but needs clarification. Taxation of Social Security benefits is based on your combined income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of your Social Security benefits). If your combined income is: - Below $25,000 (single) or $32,000 (married filing jointly): 0% of benefits are taxable - Between $25,000-$34,000 (single) or $32,000-$44,000 (married): up to 50% of benefits are taxable - Above $34,000 (single) or $44,000 (married): up to 85% of benefits are taxable The higher benefit from waiting wouldn't push you into a higher taxation tier by itself - it's your other income that typically determines this. But it's definitely something to consider in your overall financial planning.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
my neighbor said he just askd for 6 months retroactive benefits when he applied at 67 and got a lump sum payment. maybe thats better than waiting??
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•This is another valid option! If you're past your FRA, you can request retroactive benefits for up to 6 months (but not going before your FRA month). The trade-off is that your monthly benefit amount will be calculated as if you claimed in that earlier month - so you'd permanently give up the DRCs for those months. For example, if you apply in November 2025 and request the maximum retroactive benefits, you could get a lump sum going back to May 2025, but your ongoing monthly benefit would be calculated as if you claimed in May, not November.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
So after considering everyone's advice, I think I'm going with option 1 - starting at my FRA in June. The math makes sense, and I'd rather have the money now than wait for a slightly higher amount later. This whole DRC processing delay feels like something they should explain better on the SSA website. Without this forum, I might have waited until November thinking I'd get an immediate increase! Thanks to everyone who helped explain this confusing policy. I feel much more confident about my decision now.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•That sounds like a sensible decision for your situation. And you're absolutely right - SSA should explain this much more clearly on their website and in their publications. Most people have no idea about the January-only DRC processing until they encounter it themselves. One last tip: when you do apply, be very specific about your start month being June 2025. The default in their system sometimes applies retroactive benefits automatically if you're past FRA, which could change your start date if you're not careful when applying.
0 coins