< Back to IRS

Scarlett Forster

Pro-Rata Rule Confusion: Managing Multiple Roth IRAs & Traditional IRA Transfers

Hey everyone, I'm in a bit of a mess with this whole pro-rata rule between traditional and Roth IRAs. Just found out about this rule last week and now I'm wondering how badly I messed things up. Here's what happened: 1. January 2024: Rolled an old 401(k) worth about $94,500 into a Traditional IRA at Fidelity 2. February 2024: Rolled another old 401(k) worth roughly $137,200 into that same Traditional IRA 3. By end of 2024, that Traditional IRA balance was around $218,000 4. January 2024: Did a backdoor Roth IRA contribution of $7,000 for myself into my existing Roth IRA; year-end balance was about $63,000 5. January 2024: Did a backdoor Roth IRA contribution of $7,000 for my spouse into her existing Roth IRA; year-end balance was about $63,800 6. June 2025: Did another backdoor Roth IRA contribution of $7,500 for myself; 2025 year-end balance around $79,200 7. June 2025: Did another backdoor Roth IRA contribution of $7,500 for my spouse; 2025 year-end balance around $79,600 8. By December 31, 2025, the Traditional IRA balance had grown to roughly $250,000 So basically I've been doing backdoor Roth contributions for both me and my spouse over the past two years while also maintaining this Traditional IRA. My tax guy is telling me I need to withdraw the Roth IRA money because I was over the AGI limits in 2023, 2024, and 2025. But I thought the whole point of backdoor Roth conversions was to get around those income limits? He's also saying something about maxing out my 401(k) and my spouse's 403(b) being part of the problem, which I've never heard before. I'm totally confused because my AGI has actually been below the IRS limits for all the years in question. I thought I understood this stuff pretty well, but now I'm completely lost. Would really appreciate any help or insight!

Arnav Bengali

•

The backdoor Roth strategy is perfectly legal, but you've run into the pro-rata rule trap, which is a common misunderstanding. The pro-rata rule comes into play because you have pre-tax money in a Traditional IRA while attempting backdoor Roth conversions. Here's what's happening: When you do a backdoor Roth, you're supposed to make a non-deductible contribution to a Traditional IRA first, then convert it to a Roth. But the IRS looks at ALL your Traditional IRA money as one pool - they don't care which specific dollars you're converting. The pro-rata rule means your conversion is taxed proportionally based on the ratio of non-deductible to pre-tax funds across ALL your Traditional IRAs. With $250,000 in your Traditional IRA (mostly pre-tax from 401k rollovers) and only $7,500 non-deductible contributions, about 97% of any conversion would be taxable. Your tax guy is confused though - you don't need to withdraw the Roth money. The issue isn't about income limits for direct Roth contributions; it's about the tax treatment of the backdoor conversion with existing pre-tax IRA funds. One solution would be to see if your current employer's 401(k) allows reverse rollovers - moving your Traditional IRA money back into your workplace retirement plan, which would remove it from the pro-rata calculation.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

This is really helpful, but I'm still confused about one thing. If I've already done these backdoor Roth conversions in 2024 and 2025, what's my tax situation now? Do I owe taxes on those conversions because of the pro-rata rule? And does my wife's situation get calculated separately from mine?

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Yes, you would owe taxes on most of those conversions. For example, if you contributed $7,000 non-deductible to a Traditional IRA and then converted it to Roth while having $218,000 in pre-tax Traditional IRA money, about 97% of that conversion ($6,790) would be taxable income. Your wife's situation is completely separate. The pro-rata rule applies individually, so if she doesn't have pre-tax Traditional IRA balances, her backdoor Roth conversions would work as intended with minimal tax impact. The IRS treats married couples as separate individuals for IRA purposes, even when filing jointly.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

After dealing with a very similar situation last year, I found this amazing tool that saved me hours of confusion. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my situation with multiple IRAs and the pro-rata rule. I uploaded my statements and it immediately identified the pro-rata issue with my backdoor Roth conversions. The tool explained exactly what portion of my conversion would be taxable and gave me options to minimize the tax hit. It even showed me how to properly report everything on Form 8606 which is crucial for tracking non-deductible contributions. What I found most helpful was seeing a multi-year projection of how different strategies would affect my taxes.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

That sounds promising, but does it actually work with complicated situations like this? I've got multiple 401ks, IRAs, and my spouse's accounts too. Can it handle all that or is it just a basic calculator?

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

I'm skeptical about tax tools like this. How does it handle state-specific rules? I live in California and they have some weird differences in how they treat Roth conversions compared to federal. Would it cover those nuances?

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

It definitely handles complex situations like multiple accounts. I had 3 different IRAs, a 401k, and was dealing with both my own and my spouse's accounts. The tool analyzed everything separately and together to give the full picture. It even flagged specific transactions that would trigger the pro-rata rule. For state-specific rules, it actually does address those differences. I'm in New York, and it pointed out how NY treats the conversions versus federal treatment. It covers most states including California, which as you mentioned has some specific quirks around Roth conversions. It highlighted those differences in the report it generated.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

I tried https://taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and wow - it cleared up my pro-rata confusion completely! I was in almost the exact same situation with old 401k rollovers making my backdoor Roth conversions a tax nightmare. The tool showed me that I could do a reverse rollover of my Traditional IRA funds into my current employer's 401k, which would eliminate the pro-rata issue completely. I had no idea this was even an option! It saved me from potentially paying thousands in unexpected taxes. The Form 8606 walkthrough was super helpful too since that form is notoriously confusing. Just sharing since it actually worked for me and my situation was almost identical to what you're describing.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

I spent 6 months trying to reach someone at the IRS to answer questions about my pro-rata situation and kept hitting endless hold times. Finally tried https://claimyr.com after my CPA recommended it and got through to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent confirmed that I didn't need to withdraw my Roth contributions - I just needed to properly report the taxable portion of my conversion on my tax return using Form 8606. They also confirmed that my spouse's situation was completely separate from mine for pro-rata calculations, which was a huge relief.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

How does this Claimyr thing actually work? Do they just sit on hold for you, or do they somehow have special access to the IRS? Seems kinda strange that they could get through when nobody else can.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

Yeah right... an IRS agent actually gave helpful tax advice? I've spent hours on the phone with them and never got a straight answer about anything. Sounds like a scam to me. Why would you need a service to call the IRS when you can just do it yourself?

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

They don't have special access - they use an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent answers, you get a call connecting you directly to that agent. It's basically just saving you from having to stay on hold for hours. I was skeptical at first too, which is why I watched their demo video before trying. The IRS agents are indeed helpful if you can actually reach them, which is the hard part. They won't do complex tax planning, but they absolutely can confirm procedures and requirements like reporting pro-rata conversions correctly on Form 8606. I specifically asked about the need to withdraw Roth funds and they clarified this common misconception.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

I'm eating crow here. After dismissing Claimyr in my earlier comment, I decided to try it out of desperation. Got through to an IRS agent in about 25 minutes after spending literally WEEKS trying on my own. The agent confirmed exactly what others here have said - I don't need to withdraw anything from my Roth accounts. I just need to properly report the taxable portion of the conversion on Form 8606. The agent walked me through how the pro-rata calculation works and confirmed that my wife's IRAs don't affect my calculation (and vice versa). They also explained that maxing out 401k/403b plans has absolutely nothing to do with backdoor Roth eligibility - your tax guy is mixing up different concepts there. The income limits only affect direct Roth contributions, not backdoor conversions. My accountant had me all worked up for nothing!

0 coins

One option nobody has mentioned yet is to consider a "mega backdoor Roth" if your current 401k plan allows after-tax contributions beyond the standard pre-tax/Roth limits. This could be a way to get more money into Roth accounts without dealing with the pro-rata issues. For your existing situation, you need to carefully track your non-deductible contributions on Form 8606 every year so you're not double-taxed later. Any accountant who confuses backdoor Roth strategies with income limits for direct contributions might not be familiar enough with these strategies.

0 coins

Thanks for bringing up the mega backdoor option! Does that completely bypass the pro-rata rule problem I'm dealing with? And do most employer plans allow the after-tax contributions you're talking about?

0 coins

The mega backdoor Roth bypasses the pro-rata issue because it works through your 401k, not through IRAs. The pro-rata rule only applies to IRA conversions, not to 401k rollovers. Only about 40% of employer plans allow after-tax contributions and in-plan Roth conversions needed for the mega backdoor strategy. You'd need to contact your HR or benefits department to see if your plan allows: 1) after-tax contributions beyond the standard $23,000 limit, and 2) either in-plan Roth conversions or in-service distributions of those after-tax amounts. Many large companies offer this, but smaller employers often don't.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

I'm confused why people are suggesting such complicated solutions. If your income is below the Roth IRA contribution limits as you mentioned, why not just contribute directly to your Roth IRAs instead of doing backdoor conversions?

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

I think OP meant their income was below the Traditional IRA deduction limits, not the Roth contribution limits. If their MAGI is above $214,000 (married filing jointly in 2024), they couldn't make direct Roth contributions but could still do backdoor.

0 coins

Your tax professional seems to be mixing up several different concepts here, which is unfortunately pretty common with backdoor Roth strategies. Let me help clarify what's actually happening: 1. **You don't need to withdraw anything from your Roth IRAs.** The money is already there legally - the issue is just how much tax you owed on the conversions. 2. **The pro-rata rule means you owe taxes on most of your conversions.** With $250k in pre-tax Traditional IRA money and only small non-deductible contributions, roughly 97% of each conversion was taxable income that should have been reported on your tax returns. 3. **Your spouse's situation is completely separate.** If she doesn't have pre-tax Traditional IRA balances, her backdoor Roth conversions work normally with minimal tax impact. 4. **Maxing out 401k/403b has nothing to do with this.** Your tax guy is confusing workplace retirement plan limits with IRA strategies. 5. **Income limits don't prevent backdoor conversions.** They only affect direct Roth contributions. The whole point of backdoor Roth is to get around those limits. For going forward, consider asking your current employer if their 401k accepts reverse rollovers. Moving your Traditional IRA balance back into a workplace plan would eliminate the pro-rata problem for future conversions. You'll also need to make sure Form 8606 was filed correctly for all years to track your non-deductible contributions. Might be worth getting a second opinion from a CPA who specializes in retirement planning - these strategies require specific expertise that not all tax professionals have.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I was looking for! I'm definitely going to look into the reverse rollover option with my current employer's 401k. One question though - if I do move my Traditional IRA balance back into my 401k, does that fix the pro-rata issue retroactively for the conversions I already did in 2024 and 2025, or would it only help going forward? And do I need to move ALL of my Traditional IRA money, or can I leave some and still improve the pro-rata calculation?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today