< Back to IRS

Gael Robinson

Is property damage settlement money taxable for damaged trees and land?

So we just wrapped up this lawsuit where a company destroyed our trees and damaged our property. They ended up settling with us for $20k plus a small parcel of land adjacent to our property. After our lawyer took their cut, we got a check for about $16,800. Our accountant is now telling us that the ENTIRE $20k is considered taxable income, not just what we received after legal fees. This seems really unfair since we're basically just being compensated for damage to our property, not actually "earning" anything. I'm trying to understand if this is actually correct and why property damage settlements would be taxable in the first place. Does anyone know the tax rules around property damage settlements? I thought compensation for property damage was usually non-taxable if it's just making you "whole" again.

Actually, property damage settlements can be a bit complicated for tax purposes. The general rule is that settlements for physical damage to property are usually not taxable if they don't exceed your adjusted basis in the property (basically what you paid for it plus improvements, minus depreciation). However, there are some important details to consider here. If the settlement amount is less than your basis in the damaged property (the trees and land), then it's likely not taxable. But if the settlement exceeds your basis, the excess could be taxable as a capital gain. Also, the small piece of land you received as part of the settlement would be considered property received with a basis equal to its fair market value. The legal fees are another consideration. If the settlement is non-taxable, the legal fees aren't deductible. If part of the settlement is taxable, a proportionate amount of the legal fees might offset that taxable portion.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

So wait, if the trees were on land I inherited from my grandparents 30 years ago, would I even know what the "basis" is? And does it matter if the trees were planted by me or were already there? This is confusing.

0 coins

For inherited property, your basis would be the fair market value of the property at the time you inherited it (called a "stepped-up basis"), which can be determined through an appraisal or tax records from that time. If you've owned it for 30 years, you'd use that stepped-up value as your starting point. Regarding the trees, if you planted them, your costs for purchasing and planting them would be added to your basis in the property. If they were already there when you inherited the property, their value would be included in the overall property value at inheritance time.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

I went through something similar and ended up using https://taxr.ai to figure out the tax implications of my property settlement. It was super helpful because I uploaded all my settlement documents and they analyzed exactly how much was taxable. Saved me from overpaying taxes on money that was actually just reimbursement for my property damage. Their system looks at the actual settlement agreement language and determines what portions are for physical damages vs other compensation. Really helpful for these complicated situations where normal tax software doesn't give you the right guidance.

0 coins

Liam Duke

•

Can it actually tell the difference between compensation for the property itself versus emotional distress or punitive damages? Because those parts are definitely taxed differently right?

0 coins

Manny Lark

•

I'm a bit skeptical about AI tools for tax advice. Wouldn't an actual tax attorney be better for something this specific? Did they provide any documentation you could show to the IRS if you get audited?

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

Yes, it actually does differentiate between physical property damage, emotional distress, punitive damages, and other categories. The system identified the specific language in my settlement that indicated what each portion was compensating for, which helped a lot with the tax treatment. As for documentation, they provide a detailed analysis report that explains the tax treatment of each portion of your settlement with references to the relevant tax codes and IRS rulings. It's definitely not just generic advice - it's specific to your actual settlement document language and circumstances.

0 coins

Manny Lark

•

I have to admit I was wrong about my skepticism! I decided to try https://taxr.ai with my own property damage settlement from last year (tree fell from neighbor's yard, damaged my garage). The system actually found language in my settlement agreement that my accountant missed - showing that about 60% was clearly for property restoration which isn't taxable since it was less than my basis. What impressed me was how it broke down each paragraph of the settlement agreement and explained the tax implications. My accountant had just lumped it all together as taxable income. I'm actually going to file an amended return now to get some money back!

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

If you're having trouble getting clear answers from the IRS about your settlement taxation, I'd recommend using https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. I was going in circles trying to get someone on the phone about my property settlement tax questions last year and their service got me connected in about 20 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they wait on hold with the IRS for you and then call you when an agent is ready. I found it super helpful because the IRS website info on settlements is really confusing and I needed clarification specific to my situation.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

Do they actually stay on the line with you or do they just connect you? I'm worried about giving someone else my tax details.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

Yeah right, like someone's actually going to get you through to the IRS faster. Sounds like a scam to me. I've never been able to get through no matter what time of day I call.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

They don't stay on the line during your actual conversation with the IRS. Their system just navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you, then calls you when an agent picks up. At that point, it's just you and the IRS agent talking directly. I was skeptical too until I tried it. I had been trying to get through for 3 days with no luck. With Claimyr, I got a call back in about 25 minutes and was connected directly to an IRS agent who answered my questions about my settlement taxation. It's not a scam - they just have a system that handles the hold time for you.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

I hate admitting when I'm wrong but I feel like I need to follow up here. After being super skeptical about Claimyr, I decided to try it anyway because I was desperate to talk to someone about my property damage settlement from a tree falling on my car. It actually worked! Got a call back in like 30 minutes and was talking to a real IRS person. The agent explained that I didn't need to report my insurance settlement as income since it didn't exceed my basis in the car. Saved me about $2k in taxes I was about to pay unnecessarily. Wish I'd known this years ago instead of spending hours on hold.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Another thing to consider: if part of your settlement was for the decrease in your property's overall value (beyond just the cost of the trees), that might be treated as a reduction to your basis rather than taxable income. Worth asking your accountant about that specific angle.

0 coins

Gael Robinson

•

Thanks for bringing that up! Our settlement actually did specify that about $8k was for the "diminished property value" separate from the actual tree replacement costs. The accountant didn't mention anything about basis reduction. Does that mean we might not owe taxes on that portion?

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Yes, that's exactly right! The $8k for diminished property value would typically be treated as a reduction to your basis in the property rather than as taxable income. This is because it's compensating you for a loss in value, not providing you with income. Your accountant should reconsider the tax treatment of that portion. Only amounts that exceed your original basis would potentially be taxable. Make sure to clearly point out that the settlement specifically allocated this amount for diminished property value.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

I'm curious about the piece of land you received as part of the settlement. That's considered a non-cash payment and you'll have a tax basis in that land equal to its fair market value at the time of the settlement. Did your accountant mention how to handle that part?

0 coins

Darren Brooks

•

I had something similar with a land swap after a boundary dispute. My tax guy said I needed to get an actual appraisal of the land's value at the time I received it to establish the basis. Cost me about $400 for the appraisal but worth it for the documentation.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

Your accountant may be oversimplifying this. Property damage settlements have specific tax rules that depend on several factors. The key question is whether the settlement exceeds your "adjusted basis" in the damaged property (trees and land). For the trees specifically, if they were mature trees that had been growing for years, they likely had significant value that should be part of your property's basis. The IRS generally treats compensation for destroyed timber/trees as a return of capital up to your basis, not taxable income. Given that your settlement specified $8k for "diminished property value" as mentioned in your comment, that portion should definitely reduce your basis rather than being taxable income. I'd strongly recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional who specializes in property damage settlements, because it sounds like your current accountant might not be familiar with these specific rules. Also consider getting documentation of the trees' value before destruction - this could significantly increase your basis and reduce any potential tax liability.

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm wondering though - how do you go about documenting the value of trees that were destroyed? We didn't have any appraisals done beforehand obviously, and some of these trees were probably 50+ years old. Is there a way to retroactively establish their value for tax basis purposes? Also, when you mention getting a second opinion from someone who specializes in property damage settlements, do you have any suggestions on how to find that type of specialist? I'm worried our regular accountant just isn't equipped to handle this specific situation.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today