How to Handle Taxes on a Gifted Home I Quickly Sold - Potential Tax Implications?
I'm in a bit of a situation and would really appreciate some tax advice. My mom was planning to sell her house to cover some medical expenses following her heart attack diagnosis. She initially thought she didn't have much time left and transferred the house to me using a quitclaim deed just in case the worst happened. Thankfully, she's still with us today. About 50 days after she gifted me the house, I sold it following her wishes. I've already given my mom all the money from the sale, but I'm worried about what this means for my taxes. Here are the details: - House was gifted to me about 50 days ago, valued around $470,000 - Sold it to my sister per my mom's instructions for $335,000, essentially gifting her $135,000 in equity - Also gave $80,000 to another family member (my uncle), again following my mom's wishes - My mom originally bought the property 20 years ago for approximately $88,000 and put roughly the same amount into renovations What kind of tax situation am I looking at here? Am I going to get hit with a big tax bill even though I didn't keep any of the money?
18 comments


Mateo Hernandez
You've got a complicated situation with several tax implications to consider. When you receive a gifted property, you take on the giver's cost basis (what your mom paid plus improvements) rather than the current market value. This is called "carryover basis." Based on what you've described, your mom's basis was about $176,000 ($88k purchase + $88k improvements). When you sold for $335,000, there's potentially a taxable gain of $159,000 ($335,000 - $176,000), regardless of what you did with the proceeds afterward. The fact that you sold it to your sister below market value could be considered a gift from you to her. Since you gave money to family members, you should be aware of annual gift tax exclusions ($17,000 per recipient in 2023). The most important thing is that the IRS will likely view YOU as the person who sold the property and realized the gain, even though you gave the money away. Tax liability follows the legal owner at the time of sale.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•So even though OP didn't keep any of the money, they still have to pay taxes on the gain? Does it matter that they only owned the house for 50 days? And what about the fact that they sold it below market value? Doesn't that change anything?
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•The duration of ownership doesn't change the tax treatment of the gain in this case. Whether you owned it for 50 days or 50 years, you inherited the original owner's basis and holding period for capital gains purposes. Selling below market value to a family member is viewed by the IRS as a sale at that price plus a gift of the difference. So the taxable gain is still calculated based on the actual sale price minus the carried-over basis, not the market value. The difference between market value and sale price is considered a gift from you to your sister, which may have gift tax implications if it exceeds the annual exclusion amount.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
After dealing with a similar situation with my parents' property, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which was super helpful for sorting out the basis calculation and capital gains issues. My situation was almost identical - my dad transferred property to me before passing and I sold it quickly afterward. The most confusing part for me was figuring out the adjusted basis with all the improvements over the years. The tool analyzed everything and showed exactly how the stepped-up basis rules worked in my case. It even helped document all the improvements my dad had made to strengthen my position with the IRS. You might want to check it out since family property transfers with quick sales afterward tend to get extra scrutiny from the IRS.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•How exactly does this service work? Do you just upload documents or do they connect you with an actual tax professional? I'm dealing with my parents' rental property right now and trying to figure out if I should sell or keep it after they put it in my name.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•I'm skeptical about these tax services. Wouldn't it be better to just go to a CPA who specializes in real estate? How much does it cost and is it really better than in-person advice?
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•You basically upload any documents you have - the property records, improvement receipts, gift transfer documents - and the system analyzes everything to determine your correct tax position. It's not just a document review though - it provides actual guidance on how to handle the situation on your tax forms. The real value for me was having all the proper documentation with the exact calculations ready if the IRS ever questions the transaction. It's much more affordable than most CPAs I checked with who wanted to charge me hourly for researching the same information.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
I was initially hesitant about taxr.ai like I mentioned above, but after looking into my options for handling my mom's gifted property, I decided to try it. Super glad I did! I had a complicated situation with a house my mom gifted me that I sold within 3 months. The system immediately identified that I needed to use her original basis rather than the value when gifted to me, which saved me from a major reporting error. It also helped me document all the improvement expenses properly, which reduced my taxable gain by over $45,000. What really impressed me was how it helped me understand the gift tax implications since I gave some of the proceeds to my siblings. Definitely worth checking out if you're in a similar situation with family property transfers.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
Have you tried contacting the IRS directly? I was in a somewhat similar situation and spent WEEKS trying to get through to someone who could actually help. It was beyond frustrating until I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). There's also a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was skeptical at first, but they literally got me connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. The agent walked me through exactly how to handle the reporting of a property transfer between family members and what documentation I needed to keep for my records. For a complicated situation like yours with multiple family members involved and large sums of money changing hands, I'd definitely recommend getting official guidance directly from the IRS.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Wait, what is this service exactly? Does it literally just help you skip the phone queue to talk to the IRS? How does that even work? I've been waiting on hold for literally hours trying to get answers about a similar situation.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Yeah right. Nobody gets through to the IRS quickly. This sounds like a scam to me. The IRS is notorious for long wait times and unhelpful agents even if you do get through. I don't see how any service could magically fix that.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•It's a service that uses a special callback system to navigate the IRS phone system. Instead of you waiting on hold for hours, they essentially hold your place in line and call you when they've got an agent on the line ready to talk to you. It's definitely not a scam. The service doesn't access your personal information or talk to the IRS for you - they just handle the waiting part and connect you directly once an agent is available. I was just as skeptical as you are, but when I was desperate to get answers about my property transfer situation, I tried it and was connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
I have to eat my words from my previous comment. After another frustrating morning waiting on hold with the IRS about my inherited property situation, I decided to try Claimyr in desperation. I was shocked when they actually got me through to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. The agent confirmed that in a situation like yours, you would indeed be responsible for the capital gains tax on the difference between the sales price and the original owner's basis, regardless of whether you kept the money. The agent also explained that giving the proceeds away is considered a separate transaction from the sale itself - so you could potentially have both capital gains tax AND gift tax implications. They recommended documenting everything carefully, including the fact that you were essentially acting as an intermediary following your parent's wishes.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
I think everyone is overlooking something important here. If your mother is still alive, why not just deed the property back to her and let HER sell it directly? Then she could distribute the money however she wants without you being in the middle. This would eliminate your tax liability completely since you wouldn't be the seller. I had to do something similar with my grandfather's property a few years ago - we realized the tax implications of the gift to me were bad, so we reversed it before selling.
0 coins
NebulaNova
•That would have been a good option, but it's too late now - I already sold the property about 6 months ago. I was just hoping there might be a way to avoid getting stuck with a big tax bill since I was basically just following my mom's instructions and didn't keep any of the profits.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•That's unfortunate timing. For future reference (or for anyone else reading this thread), always consult with a tax professional BEFORE making property transfers between family members. These transactions are complex and can have significant tax consequences. Since the sale has already happened, your best option now is probably to gather all documentation showing that you were acting on your mother's behalf. While this doesn't eliminate your tax liability, good documentation might help if there's ever an audit. Make sure you have the quitclaim deed, documentation of the original basis (purchase price plus improvements), the sales contract, and proof that you transferred the proceeds to your mother and other family members.
0 coins
Mei Lin
Couldn't the OP potentially argue this was a "step transaction" where they were essentially just acting as an agent for their mother? Since the mother is still alive and OP immediately gave all the money back to her and the other family members per her instructions, maybe the IRS would consider the mother the true seller?
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•The step transaction doctrine actually might work against OP in this case. The IRS could view the series of transactions (mother gifts to OP, OP sells and distributes money) as an attempt to avoid proper tax treatment. Since the legal ownership was transferred to OP before the sale, OP is technically the seller for tax purposes. The subsequent distribution of funds is considered separate. This arrangement actually creates more tax complications than if the mother had sold it directly and then gifted portions of the proceeds. What might help OP's case is documenting that they were acting under a power of attorney or as a fiduciary for their mother, but that would need to have been established properly before these transactions occurred.
0 coins