< Back to UCC Document Community

Danielle Mays

Understanding UCC-1 blanket lien coverage - does it really secure all business assets?

I'm trying to wrap my head around what exactly gets covered when a lender files a UCC-1 with blanket lien language. Our equipment finance company just had a borrower default and I'm realizing I might not fully understand the scope of what we actually secured. The UCC-1 filing says something like 'all equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, and general intangibles now owned or hereafter acquired.' Does this really mean we have a security interest in literally everything the business owns? What about stuff they bought after we filed? I've heard conflicting things about whether you need to be more specific in the collateral description or if this broad language actually holds up. Any insights from people who've dealt with blanket lien enforcement would be really helpful.

Roger Romero

•

A UCC-1 blanket lien can be incredibly broad if drafted correctly. The key phrase 'now owned or hereafter acquired' is what gives you that after-acquired property coverage. So yes, equipment purchased after your filing date would typically be covered under your security interest, assuming your loan agreement includes the same broad language. The collateral description you mentioned sounds pretty standard and should hold up in most jurisdictions.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear. So the timing of when they acquire new assets doesn't matter as long as our original UCC-1 had that after-acquired language?

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

Correct, but make sure your security agreement matches your UCC-1 collateral description. The financing statement is just notice - your actual rights come from what's in the security agreement.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

I learned this the hard way last year. Had a blanket lien UCC-1 that seemed bulletproof until we tried to collect. Turns out the debtor name on our filing didn't exactly match their legal entity name in the state records. Even though we had broad collateral coverage, the name mismatch made our entire filing ineffective. Before you rely on your blanket lien, definitely verify the debtor name is spot-on.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Oh no, that's terrifying. How do you even check that the name matches perfectly? Is there a way to verify this stuff before it becomes a problem?

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

I actually found a tool called Certana.ai that lets you upload your UCC-1 and cross-check it against the debtor's corporate documents. You just upload PDFs and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies or other document conflicts. Wish I'd known about it earlier - would have saved me a lot of headache.

0 coins

Never heard of that but sounds useful. Is it one of those expensive legal tech tools or actually practical for regular use?

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

No it's actually pretty straightforward to use. You just upload your documents and it does the verification automatically. Much easier than trying to manually compare corporate charters against UCC filings.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

Blanket liens are great in theory but enforcement can get messy depending on what other creditors are involved. Even with a properly filed UCC-1, you might run into purchase money security interests that take priority over your blanket lien for specific equipment. And don't get me started on trying to figure out what qualifies as 'equipment' versus 'inventory' when you're actually trying to seize assets.

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

This is why I hate blanket liens... too much grey area when it comes to actual collection

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

They definitely require more legal work on the backend, but for working capital lines they're often the only practical option.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

One thing to watch out for - some states have specific requirements for certain types of collateral even in blanket lien situations. Like in some jurisdictions you need additional filings for motor vehicles or real estate fixtures even if they're mentioned in your UCC-1. The broad collateral description doesn't automatically override other filing requirements.

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

Good point about fixtures. We had a situation where equipment got permanently attached to real estate and suddenly our UCC-1 wasn't sufficient anymore.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

Exactly - fixture filings are a whole different beast. You need a UCC-1 filed in the real estate records, not just the central filing office.

0 coins

Wait, so a regular UCC-1 filing doesn't cover equipment that gets bolted down to a building?

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

Not necessarily. Once equipment becomes a fixture by being permanently attached to real estate, you typically need a separate fixture filing to maintain your security interest.

0 coins

I've seen blanket liens cause problems when borrowers have multiple lenders. Even though your UCC-1 might be first in time, if another lender has a more specific security interest in particular assets, they could have priority. It's not just about when you filed - it's about what exactly you filed for.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

This is getting complicated. How do you even figure out who has priority in these situations?

0 coins

UCC search reports help, but honestly you need a lawyer to sort through competing security interests. The priority rules can be really counterintuitive.

0 coins

Here's something that might help with the document verification piece - I started using Certana.ai after having similar concerns about whether our UCC filings were actually enforceable. The platform lets you upload your loan documents and UCC filings together to check for consistency issues. Found out we had several filings where the collateral descriptions didn't quite match our security agreements. Could have been a real problem down the road.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

That sounds like exactly what we need. Are you talking about the document checking feature where you upload PDFs?

0 coins

Yeah, you can do Charter-to-UCC-1 checks or UCC-3-to-UCC-1 comparisons. Really helpful for catching those small discrepancies that could invalidate your filings.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Don't forget about continuation filings! Your blanket lien is only good for 5 years unless you file a UCC-3 continuation. I've seen lenders lose their security interest entirely because they forgot to continue their financing statements. Mark your calendar for year 4.5 and file the continuation early.

0 coins

OMG yes, this almost happened to us. Thank goodness our paralegal caught it in time.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

It's such an easy thing to miss but completely fatal if you forget. Set up automatic reminders.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Good call on the continuation reminder. Our current filing is only about 18 months old but I should definitely get that on the calendar now.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

The broad collateral language you mentioned should cover most business assets, but there can be exceptions. Consumer goods, even when used in a business, sometimes have different rules. And certain regulated assets like aircraft or vessels have their own registration systems that might take priority over your UCC filing.

0 coins

What about inventory that turns over frequently? Does the blanket lien automatically attach to new inventory as it comes in?

0 coins

PaulineW

•

Generally yes, if you have after-acquired property language. But the debtor has to have rights in the collateral for your security interest to attach, so there can be timing issues with inventory that's on consignment or subject to other arrangements.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

One more verification tip - I actually ran all our UCC filings through Certana.ai's document checker after reading about name mismatch issues on another forum. Turned out we had three filings where the debtor names weren't quite right. The AI spotted differences between our corporate charter information and UCC-1 debtor names that I never would have caught manually. Definitely worth doing a comprehensive review if you're relying on these filings for security.

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

How detailed does the system get with the name matching? Like does it flag minor punctuation differences?

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

It's pretty thorough. Catches things like 'Inc.' versus 'Incorporated' or missing commas that could potentially invalidate a filing. The automated checking is way more reliable than trying to eyeball these things.

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

Just make sure you understand what happens if the debtor files bankruptcy. Blanket liens can be challenged as preferential transfers if they were filed too close to the bankruptcy filing, and the trustee might try to avoid your security interest entirely. The broader your collateral coverage, the more scrutiny you might face in bankruptcy court.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

How close to bankruptcy filing becomes problematic? Is there a specific timeframe to worry about?

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

Generally 90 days for regular creditors, but it can be longer if you're considered an insider. Best to file your UCC-1 as early as possible in the lending relationship.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Our filing was done at loan origination about 18 months ago, so that shouldn't be an issue. Good to know though.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Thanks everyone for the detailed responses - this has been incredibly helpful! I'm feeling much more confident about our blanket lien coverage now. It sounds like the key things to verify are: 1) debtor name accuracy on the filing, 2) making sure our security agreement language matches the UCC-1, and 3) staying on top of continuation filings. I'm definitely going to run our existing filings through one of those document verification tools that several people mentioned to catch any issues before they become problems. This community is amazing for getting real-world insights on this stuff!

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Great summary Ethan! I'm new to this community but have been lurking and learning a lot from these discussions. As someone just getting started with UCC filings, this thread has been invaluable. One follow-up question - when you run those document verification checks, do you typically do it just once when the loan is originated, or periodically throughout the loan term? I'm wondering if things like corporate name changes or amendments could affect the validity of older filings.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today