UCC restatement filing - do I need to refile everything or just amend existing?
I'm dealing with a corporate restructuring where our borrower is doing a UCC restatement. The original UCC-1 was filed 3 years ago with the old entity name and now they've restated their articles. I'm getting conflicting advice about whether I need to file a completely new UCC-1 with the restated entity name or if I can just do a UCC-3 amendment to change the debtor name. The collateral is the same - equipment and inventory - but the legal entity name has changed through the restatement process. Has anyone dealt with UCC restatement situations before? I don't want to mess this up and lose perfection on a $2.8M loan. The continuation isn't due until next year but I'm worried about the name change affecting our lien position.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Jasmine Hancock
UCC restatement can be tricky. Generally you'll want to file a UCC-3 amendment to change the debtor name rather than starting over with a new UCC-1. The key is making sure the amendment clearly shows the connection between the old name and the new restated name. What state are you filing in? Some states have specific requirements for entity name changes.
0 coins
James Maki
•We're in Delaware. The restatement changed the entity from 'ABC Manufacturing Corp.' to 'ABC Manufacturing Corporation' - so it's really just adding the full word instead of the abbreviation. Does that make a difference?
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•Delaware is pretty strict about exact name matches. Even that Corp vs Corporation difference could be an issue. I'd definitely recommend filing the UCC-3 amendment to be safe.
0 coins
Cole Roush
Had this exact situation last month with a restatement filing. Don't just assume an amendment will work - you need to verify the new entity name matches exactly what's on the restated articles. I made the mistake of filing the amendment before getting the certified copy of the restatement and had to refile because the name was slightly different than what the borrower told me.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
•This is why I always wait for the certified articles before doing anything. Too many times I've seen people jump the gun on amendments.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
•Agreed! The devil is in the details with entity names. One wrong comma or abbreviation and your filing gets rejected.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and restatements always make me nervous. The safest approach is usually to file both - keep the original UCC-1 active and file a new one with the restated name, then terminate the old one once you're sure the new one is properly perfected. It costs more but protects your position.
0 coins
James Maki
•That's an interesting approach. Wouldn't that create two active filings on the same collateral though? Could that cause issues down the road?
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
•Not really - you'd only have overlap for a short period. Once the new filing is confirmed, you terminate the old one. It's belt and suspenders but worth it for a $2.8M loan.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
•I like this approach too. Better safe than sorry with large loans.
0 coins
Derek Olson
Actually just dealt with something similar and found this tool called Certana.ai that really helped. You can upload your original UCC-1 and the new restatement documents and it instantly checks for name consistency issues. Saved me from filing an amendment with the wrong entity name format. Just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
James Maki
•Interesting - never heard of that. How does it work exactly? Does it actually compare the documents or just flag potential issues?
0 coins
Derek Olson
•It does actual document comparison. You upload your charter docs and UCC filings and it verifies the debtor names match exactly. Really helpful for catching those small differences that can kill a filing.
0 coins
Danielle Mays
ugh why does every state have different rules for this stuff? I swear I spend more time figuring out filing requirements than actually doing the legal work. Last week I had a restatement in Texas that required completely different forms than what I used in Florida.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•Tell me about it. And don't even get me started on the different search requirements between states.
0 coins
Danielle Mays
•Exactly! It's like they all got together and decided to make it as complicated as possible.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
Wait, I'm confused - is a restatement the same as an amendment to articles? I thought those were different things. We have a client doing some kind of corporate change and I want to make sure I'm handling the UCC side correctly.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•No, they're different. A restatement typically involves restating the entire articles of incorporation, often including name changes. An amendment just changes specific provisions.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
•Oh okay that makes sense. So with a restatement I'd definitely need to check if the entity name changed and file a UCC-3 if it did?
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•Exactly. Always compare the old and new entity names character by character.
0 coins
Niko Ramsey
For what it's worth, I've never had an issue just filing a UCC-3 amendment for entity name changes from restatements. As long as you clearly indicate the old name and new name in the amendment, most states accept it without question. Just make sure you're using the exact names from the official documents.
0 coins
Seraphina Delan
•That's been my experience too. The amendment route is usually the way to go.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
•Same here - amendment has worked every time for me.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
Just to add another data point - I tried Certana.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it actually caught an issue I would have missed. The borrower's restatement had a slight punctuation change that wasn't obvious from just reading the documents. Would have caused problems if I'd filed the amendment without catching it.
0 coins
James Maki
•That's exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about. Those tiny differences can be killer.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
•Yeah, it's worth checking these things electronically rather than trying to spot the differences manually. Too easy to miss small changes.
0 coins
Micah Trail
One thing to consider is timing. If your borrower is in the middle of the restatement process, make sure you wait until it's officially filed with the state before doing your UCC amendment. I've seen people file amendments based on draft restatements that ended up being different from the final version.
0 coins
James Maki
•Good point. The restatement was filed last week so we should be good there. Just waiting on the certified copy now.
0 coins
Micah Trail
•Perfect. Once you have that certified copy you'll know exactly what name to use in your amendment.
0 coins
Nia Watson
Update: Thanks everyone for the advice. I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned to double-check the name differences and filed a UCC-3 amendment. The system accepted it without any issues. The name change was more significant than I initially thought - there were some punctuation differences I hadn't noticed. Glad I caught those before filing.
0 coins
Derek Olson
•Great to hear it worked out! Those little details can really trip you up.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
•Glad you got it sorted. UCC restatement issues always make me nervous but sounds like you handled it perfectly.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•Nice work being thorough. Better to catch those differences upfront than deal with rejected filings later.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with my first restatement situation and was completely overwhelmed by the process. The advice about waiting for certified copies and using tools like Certana.ai to catch name discrepancies is exactly what I needed. Quick question - when filing the UCC-3 amendment, do you typically include both the old and new entity names in the debtor name field, or is there a specific format most states prefer?
0 coins