< Back to UCC Document Community

Saleem Vaziri

UCC deposit account perfection - bank says no filing needed?

I'm dealing with a confusing situation regarding UCC perfection for deposit accounts. My company is securing a $275,000 equipment loan and the bank is telling me that deposit accounts don't require UCC-1 filings for perfection - they claim 'control' is sufficient. But I'm reading conflicting information online about when you actually need to file vs. when control alone works. The deposit account has about $180,000 that we're pledging as additional collateral along with the equipment. Has anyone dealt with this before? I don't want to mess up the perfection and have our lender come back later saying we needed a filing. The loan closes next week and I'm getting nervous about whether we're handling the UCC deposit account requirements correctly.

Kayla Morgan

•

Your bank is technically correct - deposit accounts can be perfected by control without a UCC-1 filing. Control means the secured party has the ability to direct disposition of the funds. But here's the catch: if you have OTHER collateral (like your equipment) that DOES require a UCC-1 filing, many lenders will include the deposit account on that same filing for belt-and-suspenders protection. It's not required but it's common practice.

0 coins

James Maki

•

This is exactly right. Control vs filing is one of those areas where the law allows multiple paths to perfection. The deposit account control agreement should specify who has authority over the account.

0 coins

Wait, so if they already have control, why would they also file? Seems like overkill to me. Is there some advantage to doing both?

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

The advantage is that a UCC-1 filing gives public notice to other creditors. Control is private between you and the bank. If there's ever a bankruptcy or other creditor issues, having the filing creates a clear priority date that's publicly searchable.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

I went through something similar last year with a $320K credit line. The bank insisted on BOTH control AND a UCC-1 filing that listed the deposit account. Their reasoning was that if the deposit account ever moved to a different bank, the filing would still provide notice even if the control agreement got complicated. Made sense to me - better safe than sorry when you're talking about that much money.

0 coins

That's interesting - I hadn't thought about what happens if you switch banks. Does the control agreement automatically transfer or do you have to start over?

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

You'd have to start over with a new control agreement at the new bank. That's exactly why the UCC-1 filing provides extra protection - it follows the collateral regardless of which institution holds it.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Honestly, I'd be more worried about making sure all your collateral descriptions match perfectly between your loan docs and any UCC filings. I've seen deals fall apart because the deposit account was described differently in the control agreement vs the UCC-1. Last month I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool that checks for these kinds of inconsistencies - you just upload your PDFs and it flags any mismatches between loan agreements, UCC filings, and control agreements. Saved me from a major headache when it caught a deposit account number discrepancy I would have missed.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

How does that work exactly? Do you upload all the documents at once or check them one by one?

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

You can do either - I usually upload the loan agreement and UCC-1 together, then add the deposit account control agreement. It automatically cross-references account numbers, legal entity names, and collateral descriptions. Takes like 2 minutes and gives you a report of any inconsistencies.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

This sounds too good to be true lol. Are you sure it catches everything? I'm always paranoid about automated tools missing something important.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

I was skeptical too but it's been solid. Obviously you should still review everything yourself, but it's caught several things I missed during manual review. Especially helpful for deposit account numbers and entity name variations.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

The real question is whether your loan agreement REQUIRES a UCC filing for the deposit account. Some lenders put it in the loan docs even when it's not legally necessary. Check your loan agreement's security and collateral sections - if it says 'borrower shall file UCC-1 financing statements' covering the deposit account, then you need to file regardless of what the bank says about control being sufficient.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

Good point - I need to double-check the loan agreement language. The bank person I talked to might not be familiar with what their own loan docs require.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Exactly! The loan officer might know banking regulations but not necessarily the specific terms of your loan agreement. Always check the actual contract language.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

UGH this is exactly the kind of confusion that drives me crazy about UCC filings. The rules are clear but nobody explains them properly. Deposit accounts = control OR filing. Equipment = filing required. Mixed collateral = lender's choice but usually both for safety. Why can't they just make this simpler??

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

I feel you! The whole system seems designed to confuse people. At least with equipment it's straightforward - you HAVE to file.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

The problem is that every lender has different policies. Some always file for deposit accounts, some never do. It's not really a legal issue, it's a business practice issue.

0 coins

Just make sure you understand who has 'control' and what that means practically. Control usually means the secured party can instruct the bank to freeze or transfer funds without your consent. If you're comfortable with that level of control, then you might not need the filing. But if you want to maintain more control over the account, filing might be the better option since it provides perfection without giving up as much day-to-day control.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

That's a really good point about practical control vs legal perfection. I hadn't thought about the day-to-day implications.

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

Most control agreements let you use the account normally until there's a default. But you should definitely read the fine print about what triggers the lender's right to freeze the account.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

I'm probably overthinking this but what happens if you have multiple deposit accounts? Do you need separate control agreements for each one or can you do a blanket control agreement? And if you're filing UCC-1s, do you list each account separately or can you use general language like 'all deposit accounts maintained by debtor'?

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

You can usually do blanket descriptions but some lenders prefer specific account numbers. Depends on their policies and your loan agreement requirements.

0 coins

I'd go with specific account numbers if possible. Makes it clearer for everyone involved and avoids any arguments later about which accounts were intended to be covered.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

Makes sense. Better to be overly specific than leave room for interpretation.

0 coins

One thing to consider - if you're planning to open additional deposit accounts in the future, a UCC-1 filing with broader language might be better than relying on control agreements for each new account. Control agreements have to be set up individually with each bank, but a properly drafted UCC-1 can cover after-acquired deposit accounts.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

That's a great point about after-acquired property. I always forget about that aspect of UCC filings.

0 coins

Does after-acquired language work the same way for deposit accounts as it does for equipment? I thought bank accounts were treated differently.

0 coins

It can work but it depends on the specific language in the UCC-1 and whether the underlying security agreement covers after-acquired deposit accounts. Not all lenders include that language.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

Here's my take - if your loan is closing next week and the bank says control is sufficient, just go with it. You can always file a UCC-1 later if you decide you want the extra protection. But don't hold up your loan closing over this issue. The important thing is that you HAVE perfection, whether it's through control or filing.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

This is probably the most practical advice in this thread. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good when you're under deadline pressure.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

You're right - I'm probably overthinking it. As long as we have proper perfection through the control agreement, I can always add a UCC-1 filing later if needed.

0 coins

Last thought - whatever you decide, make sure you get written confirmation from your lender about their perfection requirements. If they're saying control is sufficient, get that in writing so you're covered if questions come up later. Banks change their minds sometimes and you want to be able to point to their original guidance.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

YES! Documentation is everything. Email confirmation at minimum, but preferably something signed.

0 coins

Also make sure you understand exactly what the control agreement says about your ability to use the funds. Some are more restrictive than others.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

Good call on getting written confirmation. I'll follow up with the loan officer via email to document their position on the UCC filing requirements.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today