UCC Article 9 debtor name requirements causing filing headaches
I'm dealing with a UCC-1 filing situation that's got me second-guessing everything I thought I knew about debtor naming conventions. We're securing equipment financing for a client whose legal name on their articles of incorporation shows as 'ABC Industries, Incorporated' but their federal tax ID and bank accounts all show 'ABC Industries Inc.' without the comma. The lender's charter documents reference them as 'ABC Industries Inc' (no comma, abbreviated). I've seen filings get rejected for way less significant name discrepancies, and with UCC Article 9's strict debtor name requirements, I'm worried about perfection issues down the line. Has anyone dealt with similar punctuation and abbreviation mismatches between corporate documents when preparing UCC-1 filings? The financing is time-sensitive and I can't afford to have this bounce back from the filing office. What's the safest approach when you've got these minor but potentially critical variations across different official documents?
31 comments
Join the conversation
StarStrider
I've been through this exact scenario multiple times. The key is getting the debtor name exactly as it appears on the public organic record - that means the articles of incorporation in your case. 'ABC Industries, Incorporated' with the comma would be the safe choice for your UCC-1. The tax ID and bank account variations don't control the UCC filing name.
0 coins
Zara Malik
•This is solid advice. I learned this the hard way when a filing got rejected because I used the 'doing business as' name instead of the exact corporate name from the articles.
0 coins
Luca Marino
•Wait, but what if the lender's documents use the abbreviated version? Won't that create problems with the security agreement matching the UCC filing?
0 coins
Nia Davis
You're right to be cautious about this. I had a similar issue last month where a client's LLC documents had 'Company' spelled out but their EIN paperwork abbreviated it as 'Co.' The filing office rejected it twice before I got it right. The frustrating part is how inconsistent different states can be with these requirements.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•That's exactly what I'm worried about! Did you end up using the full 'Company' spelling from the formation documents?
0 coins
Nia Davis
•Yes, went with the formation documents version and it went through clean on the third attempt. But honestly, after dealing with multiple rejection notices, I started using a document verification tool that caught these mismatches upfront.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
Before you file anything, try uploading your articles of incorporation and draft UCC-1 to Certana.ai's document checker. It'll instantly flag any debtor name inconsistencies between documents. I wish I'd known about this tool six months ago - would've saved me from three rejected filings and a very unhappy client.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•Never heard of this service but sounds useful. Does it handle the comparison between security agreements and UCC filings too?
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•Yes, you can upload multiple PDFs and it cross-checks all the debtor names, filing numbers, and document consistency. Really simple to use.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
THIS IS WHY I HATE UCC FILINGS!!! The system is so picky about every comma and period but then you get no clear guidance on which version of a company name to use when the official documents don't match. I've had clients lose financing because of rejected filings over PUNCTUATION.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•I feel your pain. Had a deal fall through last year because the UCC-1 got rejected three times for name issues and we ran out of time on the commitment letter.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•The worst part is when you call the filing office and they can't give you a straight answer about which name version to use.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
In my experience with these situations, go with the articles of incorporation name exactly as shown, including all punctuation. Also make sure your security agreement uses the exact same debtor name format. Consistency across all documents is what matters most for perfection.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•That makes sense. So even if the lender's internal documents use the abbreviated version, the UCC filing should match the state formation documents?
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Correct. The UCC follows the 'registered organization' rules which point to the public organic record - your articles of incorporation in this case.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•This is good advice but I've seen situations where lenders require the UCC debtor name to match their loan documents exactly. Sometimes you're stuck between conflicting requirements.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
just went through this last week actually. Used the full incorporated name from the articles and it went through fine. The bank stuff doesn't matter for UCC purposes, only the legal formation documents count.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Good to know it worked for you. I'm always paranoid about these name matching issues after getting burned on a few filings.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
One thing to consider is running a UCC search using both name variations before you file. That way you can see if there are existing filings under either version and avoid potential conflicts or gaps in the perfection chain.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•Smart thinking. I hadn't considered checking for existing filings under both name formats.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•This is really important advice. I've seen situations where previous filings used different name variations and it created a mess during the audit.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
I deal with equipment financing all the time and this name consistency issue comes up constantly. What's helped me is creating a checklist that includes verifying the exact debtor name format across articles, security agreement, and UCC-1 before submitting anything. Still get nervous every time though.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•A checklist is a great idea. I might steal that approach for my own filings.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
•Happy to share the template if it helps. The key items are debtor name consistency, collateral description accuracy, and filing office requirements.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
Since you mentioned this is time-sensitive, definitely use the articles of incorporation name format and file ASAP. You can always do a UCC-3 amendment later if there are issues, but getting that initial filing date locked in is crucial for your priority position.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•You're absolutely right about the timing priority. Better to file with the articles name and amend if needed than to miss the window completely.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
•This is exactly the right approach. I've seen too many deals where people overthought the name issue and lost their priority to later filers.
0 coins
NeonNova
After reading through everyone's responses, I'm convinced the articles of incorporation name is the way to go. I actually ran both versions through Certana.ai's verification tool and it flagged the abbreviated version as potentially problematic. Going to file using 'ABC Industries, Incorporated' exactly as shown in the formation documents. Thanks everyone for the guidance - this forum always comes through when I'm second-guessing myself on UCC issues.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Glad we could help! You definitely made the right choice going with the articles name.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•Smart move using the document verification. That tool has saved me so much headache on these types of filings.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•Good luck with the filing! Hope it goes through clean on the first try.
0 coins