< Back to UCC Document Community

Danielle Campbell

UCC-1 Filing Required for Trademark Security Agreement Collateral?

My client is entering into a trademark security agreement as part of a larger financing deal, and I'm trying to figure out the UCC filing requirements. The collateral includes registered trademarks, pending trademark applications, and associated goodwill. The lender wants to perfect their security interest but I'm getting conflicting advice on whether this needs a UCC-1 filing or if there's a separate trademark recording process. The trademarks are federally registered with the USPTO and worth about $2.8M according to our valuation. Has anyone dealt with trademark security agreement filings recently? I know there's debate about whether trademarks are covered under Article 9 or if they require federal recording, but I need to get this right since the loan closes next week. The debtor entity name on the trademark registrations matches exactly what we plan to use on the UCC-1, but I want to make sure we're not missing something critical here.

Rhett Bowman

•

Trademark security agreements are tricky because you're dealing with both federal and state law. For registered trademarks, most attorneys file both a UCC-1 at the state level AND record the security agreement with the USPTO. The UCC-1 covers the general security interest under Article 9, while the federal recording gives you priority against other trademark creditors. Make sure your collateral description specifically mentions 'trademarks, trademark applications, and all proceeds thereof' to be safe.

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

This is exactly right. We always do dual filings for trademark collateral because the law isn't settled on which takes precedence. Better to over-file than miss perfection.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Wait, doesn't the federal recording with USPTO cost like $40 per trademark? That could add up fast if there are multiple marks.

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

I just went through this nightmare 3 months ago. Filed the UCC-1 thinking that was enough, then our client's bankruptcy attorney told us we might not be perfected because trademarks could be considered 'general intangibles' that need federal recording. Had to scramble to get the USPTO recording done. The debtor name has to match EXACTLY between the trademark registration and your UCC filing - even a missing comma can cause problems.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

How long did the USPTO recording take? We're on a tight deadline here.

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

About 2-3 weeks for the recording to show up in their system, but you get priority from the filing date. Just make sure you submit everything correctly the first time because corrections take forever.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

For what it's worth, I discovered Certana.ai's document verification tool when I was dealing with a similar trademark security agreement issue. You can upload your trademark registration documents and your UCC-1 draft, and it'll instantly flag any debtor name mismatches or inconsistencies between the documents. Saved me from filing with a slightly different entity name that would have caused perfection issues. Really simple - just upload the PDFs and it does the cross-checking automatically.

0 coins

That sounds useful. Did it catch anything specific in your trademark filing?

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

Yeah, the trademark was registered to 'ABC Company, LLC' but our loan docs had 'ABC Company LLC' without the comma. Small difference but could have been a huge perfection problem.

0 coins

Those name variations are killers in UCC filings. I've seen liens get voided over punctuation differences.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Don't forget about the goodwill component! Trademark-associated goodwill is definitely covered under Article 9 as a general intangible, so your UCC-1 filing should explicitly include language about goodwill and going concern value. The collateral description should be something like 'all trademarks, service marks, trade names, trademark applications, and all goodwill associated therewith.' Also consider whether you need to include licensing agreements or trademark licensing revenue in your collateral description.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

Good point on the licensing agreements. Are those separate general intangibles or part of the trademark collateral?

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Licensing agreements are typically treated as separate general intangibles, but the income streams they generate could be considered proceeds of the trademark. I usually include both in the collateral description to be comprehensive.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

This is giving me flashbacks to my last trademark deal where everything went wrong. Filed the UCC-1 with what I thought was the correct debtor name, but it turns out the trademark was registered under a slightly different version of the company name. The whole thing got rejected and we had to start over. Make sure you pull the actual trademark certificates and compare them word-for-word with your loan documents. Even abbreviations like 'Corp' vs 'Corporation' can cause issues.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

How did you catch the name discrepancy? Did the Secretary of State reject the filing?

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

No, the filing went through initially, but when we did our due diligence review later, our paralegal noticed the names didn't match exactly. Had to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct it.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

At least you caught it before closing. I've seen deals where this wasn't discovered until the borrower defaulted and the lender realized their lien wasn't properly perfected.

0 coins

One thing that might help is checking whether your state has any specific requirements for intellectual property collateral. Some states have different rules about how to describe IP in UCC filings. Also, if these trademarks are used in multiple states, you might want to consider whether you need to file in other jurisdictions where the debtor does business. The $2.8M valuation suggests these are significant assets, so you want to make sure you're covered everywhere.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

For trademark collateral, isn't it usually sufficient to file in the debtor's state of organization? The trademarks themselves don't have a location like equipment or inventory.

0 coins

You're right for pure trademark rights, but if there's associated equipment, customer lists, or business operations in other states, you might need additional filings. Depends on how broadly the collateral is defined.

0 coins

Has anyone dealt with pending trademark applications as collateral? I assume those need to be handled differently since they're not yet registered with USPTO. Do you still need the federal recording for applications, or is the UCC-1 sufficient?

0 coins

Pending applications are trickier because there's no certificate to record against at USPTO. Most attorneys just rely on the UCC-1 filing for applications and then do the federal recording once the trademark registers.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

But what if the application gets abandoned or rejected? Do you lose your security interest?

0 coins

That's why you want your security agreement to cover 'all trademark applications and any trademarks issuing thereon.' If the application fails, you might not have much collateral value anyway.

0 coins

Quick update - I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier to double-check our documents before filing. It caught a middle initial discrepancy between our trademark registration and the UCC-1 that we completely missed. The trademark was registered to 'John A. Smith Enterprises LLC' but our corporate docs had 'John Smith Enterprises LLC.' Could have been a real problem if we hadn't caught it. Now I'm confident we're filing with the correct exact debtor name.

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

That's exactly the kind of detail that can kill a filing. Good catch!

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

How quickly did the tool flag the discrepancy? Sounds like it could save a lot of manual document comparison.

0 coins

Pretty much instantly after uploading both documents. It highlighted the name difference and showed exactly where the discrepancy was. Much faster than comparing documents manually.

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

Don't forget to consider the continuation filing timeline if this is a long-term loan. UCC-1 filings are only good for 5 years, so you'll need to file UCC-3 continuations to maintain perfection. With trademark collateral worth nearly $3M, you definitely don't want to let your perfection lapse. Mark your calendar for the continuation deadline and consider filing the continuation 6 months early to be safe.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

Good reminder. Is the 5-year rule the same for both the state UCC filing and the federal trademark recording?

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

The UCC filing follows the standard 5-year rule, but I'm not sure about the federal trademark recording duration. You'd need to check USPTO rules for that.

0 coins

Federal trademark security interest recordings don't expire like UCC filings. They stay on record indefinitely unless specifically terminated.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Final thought - make sure your security agreement includes provisions for maintaining the trademark registrations. If the debtor lets the trademarks lapse or doesn't pay renewal fees, your collateral could become worthless. Consider including language that allows the lender to step in and pay maintenance fees if the debtor defaults. Also think about whether you want the right to control trademark licensing or enforcement actions to protect the value of your collateral.

0 coins

That's a great point about trademark maintenance. How do you typically structure those provisions in the security agreement?

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Usually include a covenant requiring the debtor to maintain all trademark registrations and a default provision if they fail to do so. Also give the lender the right to cure any lapses and add those costs to the debt.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful - I'm dealing with a similar situation but with international trademarks in the mix. For the original poster, one additional consideration: if any of your trademarks have foreign counterpart registrations, you might want to include language in your security agreement covering those international rights as well. Even though you can't perfect against foreign trademarks through US filings, having them in your collateral description can help if the debtor tries to transfer or license those rights. Also, make sure your collateral description is broad enough to capture any trademark renewals or extensions that happen during the loan term - you don't want gaps in coverage if the debtor renews a trademark under a slightly different registration number.

0 coins

Jordan Walker

•

That's a really important point about international trademark rights that often gets overlooked. Even though you can't perfect against foreign marks through domestic filings, including them in the collateral description provides contractual coverage and could be crucial if the debtor has licensing agreements or tries to assign those international rights. I've seen cases where debtors moved valuable trademark licensing operations offshore specifically to avoid domestic security interests. The renewal/extension coverage is smart too - trademark registration numbers can change during renewals in some jurisdictions.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today