< Back to UCC Document Community

Dmitry Sokolov

Confused about UCC does not apply to real estate - equipment on property question

I'm working on a commercial loan where we're financing manufacturing equipment that will be installed at the borrower's facility. The equipment includes large industrial machines that will be bolted to the concrete floor but can be removed without damaging the building structure. My loan officer keeps saying UCC does not apply to real estate so we shouldn't file a UCC-1, but I'm pretty sure this equipment financing still needs UCC filing even though it's going on real property. The equipment is worth about $850K and includes CNC machines, industrial compressors, and automated assembly equipment. I've been doing SBA loans for 3 years but this is my first big equipment deal where the collateral will be permanently installed. Am I missing something about when UCC applies vs real estate law? The borrower owns the building but we're only financing the equipment itself.

Ava Martinez

•

Your loan officer is partially right that UCC doesn't cover real estate itself, but they're wrong about equipment. Even equipment installed on real property can still be personal property subject to UCC if it's not a fixture. The key test is whether removal would cause substantial damage to the building. CNC machines and compressors that are bolted down but removable are typically still personal property requiring UCC-1 filing.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

This is exactly right. I see this confusion constantly with equipment loans. Just because something sits on real estate doesn't make it real estate.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

But what about the bolting to concrete? Doesn't that make it more fixture-like? I had a similar situation with industrial ovens.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Bolting alone usually isn't enough for fixture status. The equipment has to be so integrated that removing it would damage the building's structure or purpose. Industrial equipment designed to be movable generally stays personal property.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

You definitely need UCC-1 filing for this equipment. I just closed a $1.2M equipment loan last month with similar collateral - automated manufacturing equipment bolted to warehouse floors. All personal property, all UCC filings. The real estate vs UCC confusion happens because some lenders think anything attached to a building becomes real estate, but that's not how it works legally.

0 coins

That's reassuring. Did you run into any issues with the collateral description? I'm trying to figure out how specific to get with the equipment serial numbers.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

We used a general description 'manufacturing equipment' plus an attached schedule with specific serial numbers. Worked fine, no rejection issues.

0 coins

Actually had a similar filing rejected once because I got too generic with the description. Better to be more specific upfront.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

I was dealing with this exact confusion six months ago on a $2M equipment package. Spent weeks going back and forth with our legal team about fixture vs personal property classification. Finally started using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your loan docs and UCC-1 draft together and it flags any inconsistencies between how you're describing the collateral in different documents. Saved me from a major headache when it caught that I was calling the same equipment 'fixtures' in the loan agreement but 'personal property' in the UCC filing.

0 coins

That sounds helpful. Does it check the debtor name consistency too? I'm always paranoid about getting the exact legal entity name wrong.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Yes, it cross-references debtor names across all uploaded documents. Catches those subtle differences like 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' that can cause problems.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

The debtor name accuracy is crucial. I've seen UCC filings become worthless because of minor name variations.

0 coins

Your loan officer probably just needs education on the fixture vs personal property distinction. This is basic secured transactions law - UCC Article 9 absolutely applies to personal property even when it's located on real estate. The fact that you're financing the equipment separately from the real estate makes it clear this should be treated as personal property collateral.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Exactly. The financing structure often determines the classification as much as the physical attachment.

0 coins

That makes sense. The borrower is getting a separate equipment loan from us, not rolling it into their real estate mortgage.

0 coins

Right, and that separate financing supports treating it as personal property. Document everything clearly in your loan agreement.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

I hate when loan officers make these blanket statements about UCC and real estate! Yes, UCC doesn't apply to real estate itself, but equipment is different. Even if it's bolted down, removable equipment usually stays personal property. File your UCC-1 and protect your lien position.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Seriously, this misconception causes so many problems. Basic training issue.

0 coins

I'm going to have a conversation with my loan officer about this. Need to make sure we're on the same page going forward.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

One thing to watch out for - if any of that equipment becomes permanently integrated into the building's operations (like HVAC systems or electrical infrastructure), those pieces might actually become fixtures. But CNC machines and compressors are typically still personal property even when bolted down. When in doubt, file the UCC-1 to protect yourself.

0 coins

Good point about the integration test. It's not just about physical attachment but functional integration too.

0 coins

The equipment is all production machinery, not building systems. Should be clearly personal property.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Then you're fine. File the UCC-1 and don't second-guess yourself.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

Been doing equipment financing for 15 years. Your loan officer is wrong. UCC Article 9 covers personal property even when it's located on real estate. The equipment you're describing - CNC machines, compressors, assembly equipment - these are textbook examples of personal property that require UCC-1 filing for perfection. The borrower owning the real estate doesn't change the equipment classification.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

15 years experience and you still see this confusion? That's concerning.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

Unfortunately yes. It's a persistent misconception, especially among lenders who primarily do real estate loans.

0 coins

This gives me confidence to push back on the loan officer's position. Thanks for the perspective.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

Just make sure you're filing in the right state! Since the equipment will be located at the borrower's facility, you'll need to file the UCC-1 in the state where the equipment is located, not necessarily where the borrower is organized. This trips up a lot of people on equipment loans.

0 coins

Good catch. The borrower is incorporated in Delaware but the equipment is going to their Texas facility.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

Then you'll need to file in Texas for the equipment. Delaware filing wouldn't perfect your security interest in Texas-located equipment.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

This is why I always double-check the location rules. Easy to mess up on multi-state deals.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

I actually had a similar situation where I was unsure about the fixture classification. Started second-guessing everything after our legal counsel raised questions. Ended up running all the documents through Certana.ai's verification system just to make sure our loan agreement, security agreement, and UCC-1 were all consistent in how we described the collateral. Turned out we had described the same equipment three different ways across the documents - that could have been a problem down the road.

0 coins

That's a good point about consistency across documents. I should check that our descriptions match up.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

Yeah, it's an easy thing to overlook but can cause real problems if you ever need to enforce the security interest.

0 coins

Your loan officer needs to understand that UCC Article 9 has specific rules for when equipment becomes fixtures versus staying personal property. The default assumption should be personal property unless there's clear evidence of fixture status. For removable manufacturing equipment, you're almost certainly looking at personal property requiring UCC-1 filing.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

The burden of proof is usually on showing fixture status, not the other way around.

0 coins

That's helpful context. I'll use that in my discussion with the loan officer.

0 coins

Exactly. When in doubt, file the UCC-1. You can always release it later if needed, but you can't go back and perfect retroactively.

0 coins

The fact that you're asking this question shows you understand the issues better than your loan officer. Equipment loans require UCC filings even when the equipment sits on real estate. This is fundamental secured transactions law. Don't let someone else's confusion put your lien position at risk.

0 coins

Thanks for the validation. I felt like I was taking crazy pills when the loan officer kept saying no UCC filing needed.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Trust your instincts on this one. Better to over-protect than under-protect your security interest.

0 coins

Absolutely. And document your rationale in the loan file so there's no question later about why you filed.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today