Security agreement perfection timing confusion - UCC filing order
Having some confusion about the timing between signing the security agreement and filing the UCC-1. We've got a client who wants to close on equipment financing next week, but I'm second-guessing whether we need the security agreement executed before or after the UCC filing hits the SOS system. The loan docs are ready but there's disagreement in our office about proper sequencing. Some colleagues say file first, others insist on security agreement signature before any UCC gets submitted. Equipment value is around $280k so we can't afford to mess up the perfection timing. Anyone dealt with this specific sequencing issue? State filing system shows everything as pending right now which adds to my stress level.
38 comments
Join the conversation
Mei Chen
You're overthinking this - the security agreement and UCC-1 filing work together but don't need precise timing coordination. The security agreement creates the security interest, the UCC-1 perfects it publicly. Most lenders I work with get the security agreement signed at closing and file the UCC-1 within a few days. As long as both happen reasonably close together you're protected.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•That's what I thought too but our compliance officer is being extra cautious after some issues last quarter with timing gaps.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Compliance officers always worry about timing but realistically a few days between signature and filing won't kill your perfection status.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
Actually the timing CAN matter depending on your state and the specific collateral type. For equipment financing especially, you want that UCC-1 filed as close to the security agreement execution as possible. I've seen deals where a gap of even 48 hours caused headaches when other creditors tried to jump in. Better safe than sorry with $280k on the line.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•This is exactly what I was worried about. What's your typical process for coordination?
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•We usually prepare the UCC-1 in advance, get everything ready to submit, then file within hours of the security agreement signing. Electronic filing makes this pretty straightforward now.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Same here - prep everything ahead of time then execute both parts of the process in rapid succession.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Had a similar situation last month and ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our document consistency before filing. You upload the security agreement and your prepared UCC-1 and it cross-checks that debtor names, collateral descriptions, everything matches perfectly. Caught two small discrepancies that would have caused filing issues. Really streamlined our process since we could verify everything was aligned before any timing pressure.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Interesting - how does that tool actually work with document verification?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Just upload PDFs of both documents and it automatically compares all the key fields. Takes maybe 2 minutes and gives you a detailed report of any mismatches.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
Why is everyone making this so complicated?? Security agreement first, then UCC filing. That's the logical order and I've never had problems doing it that way. The security interest gets created when the agreement is signed, then you perfect it with the UCC. Simple.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•You're right about the logical flow but the original poster is asking about timing gaps, not just the order.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•Fair point. I guess I don't usually have big gaps between the two steps so timing hasn't been an issue for me.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•The 'logical order' isn't always the most practical order when you're dealing with closing deadlines and SOS processing times.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
This whole thing is why I hate equipment financing deals. Too many moving parts, too many opportunities for screwups. Real estate is so much cleaner - just file your mortgage and you're done. Equipment UCC filings have all these debtor name issues, collateral description problems, continuation requirements...
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Equipment deals definitely have more complexity but the yields are usually better than real estate paper.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•True but is the extra yield worth the compliance headaches? Debatable.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Equipment financing keeps getting more popular despite the UCC complexities. Clients need the gear to operate.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
One thing nobody mentioned - make sure your security agreement language specifically covers the exact equipment described in your UCC-1 collateral schedule. I've seen deals where the security agreement was too broad or too narrow compared to the UCC filing and it created enforceability questions later.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Good point. We did review the collateral descriptions but I should double-check they match exactly.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Exact matching is critical. Even small wording differences can cause problems if you ever need to foreclose.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
Just went through something similar and honestly the document verification step saved us. Used one of those automated tools that compares your security agreement against your UCC-1 draft - found that we had the debtor's legal name slightly different between the two documents. Would have caused a rejection if we hadn't caught it.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Which tool did you use? This seems like something we should implement in our process.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
•Certana.ai - you just upload both PDFs and it highlights any inconsistencies. Really helpful for catching those small details that cause big problems.
0 coins
Mei Chen
•Debtor name mismatches are definitely one of the most common reasons for UCC filing rejections.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
The timing question really depends on your risk tolerance and the competitive situation. If other lenders are circling the deal, get that UCC-1 filed ASAP after the security agreement is signed. If it's a straightforward deal with an established client, a day or two gap probably won't hurt you.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•This is actually a competitive situation - client has been shopping the deal around. Sounds like we should minimize any timing gap.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•Definitely. In competitive deals I'd want everything filed within the same business day if possible.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
Your compliance officer might be worried about the gap because of potential fraudulent transfers or preference issues if the borrower has other financial problems. It's not just about perfection timing - it's about making sure the transaction looks legitimate and properly documented from start to finish.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•That makes sense - the borrower's financial situation is solid but I can see why compliance would want tight documentation timing.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Exactly. When everything happens quickly and is well-documented, it's much harder for anyone to challenge the transaction later.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•This is a really good point that gets overlooked. It's not just UCC law - it's broader commercial law concerns.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
UPDATE: Ended up coordinating everything for same-day execution and filing. Security agreement signed Tuesday morning, UCC-1 submitted Tuesday afternoon, confirmed filed Wednesday. Used the document checker someone mentioned earlier to make sure everything matched perfectly before submitting. Deal closed smoothly and everyone's happy with the timing.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Glad the verification tool worked out for you! It really does make the whole process less stressful.
0 coins
Mei Chen
•Same-day coordination is definitely the cleanest approach when you can make it work.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•Perfect execution. Your compliance officer should be satisfied with that timeline.
0 coins
Abigail Spencer
Great to see this resolved successfully! For future deals, I'd recommend establishing a standard same-day protocol - prepare all UCC documents in advance, schedule the security agreement signing for morning hours, and have someone dedicated to immediate electronic filing afterward. This approach minimizes perfection gaps and keeps compliance happy. The document verification step is becoming essential given how easy it is to catch mismatches before they cause filing rejections. Worth implementing as standard practice for any deal over $100k.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•This is really helpful advice for someone new to UCC filings. The $100k threshold makes sense as a trigger for extra verification steps. I'm curious - do most firms have dedicated staff for the filing piece, or is it usually handled by the same person managing the loan documents? Trying to understand how to set up efficient workflows.
0 coins