< Back to UCC Document Community

Kelsey Chin

Multifamily loan and security agreement - UCC-1 collateral description complications

Having major issues with our multifamily loan and security agreement UCC filing. We're refinancing a 48-unit apartment complex and the lender wants a UCC-1 that covers both the rental income streams and all personal property fixtures. Problem is our original security agreement from 2019 has really vague language about 'all fixtures and personal property' but doesn't specifically mention rental agreements or accounts receivable. The new lender is saying our collateral description needs to be way more specific for the UCC-1 or they won't fund. They want separate line items for rental income, security deposits, appliances, HVAC systems, and even the laundry equipment. Our attorney is charging $400/hour to review every comma and I'm wondering if there's a standard way to handle multifamily property collateral descriptions. The old UCC-1 expires in 3 months so we need to get this continuation filed anyway, but now they want to amend everything. Anyone dealt with similar multifamily collateral issues?

Multifamily collateral descriptions are tricky because you're dealing with both real estate fixtures and personal property. The rental income piece usually gets covered under 'accounts' or 'accounts receivable' in the UCC-1. For the personal property stuff like appliances and HVAC, you definitely want to be specific because generic language like 'all fixtures' can get challenged.

0 coins

That's what I'm worried about. The original security agreement just says 'all personal property' which seemed fine in 2019 but apparently standards have gotten stricter.

0 coins

Yeah the 'all personal property' thing doesn't fly anymore, especially with commercial lenders. They want line-item specificity.

0 coins

I've been through this exact scenario with a 36-unit property last year. The key is getting the collateral schedule right in your security agreement first, then making sure the UCC-1 matches exactly. Don't try to expand the collateral description in the UCC-1 beyond what's in your underlying security docs.

0 coins

So if our security agreement is vague, we can't make the UCC-1 more specific?

0 coins

Exactly. The UCC-1 can't grant more security interest than what's in the actual security agreement. You might need to amend the security agreement first.

0 coins

This is why I always tell people to get the security agreement language right from day one. Fixing it later is expensive.

0 coins

Had a similar nightmare with a multifamily refi. Ended up using Certana.ai to cross-check our security agreement against the proposed UCC-1 language. You just upload both documents and it flags any inconsistencies between them. Saved us from filing a UCC-1 that wouldn't have matched our security docs, which would have been a disaster with the lender.

0 coins

How does that work exactly? Does it actually read through the legal language?

0 coins

Yeah, it analyzes the collateral descriptions and debtor names across all your documents. Caught three mismatches we missed in our manual review.

0 coins

Never heard of this but sounds useful for complex deals like multifamily where you have so many moving parts.

0 coins

Your attorney charging $400/hour to review UCC language is nuts. Most of this stuff is pretty standard once you know the patterns. For multifamily properties, I typically see: 'all rental and lease agreements, all accounts receivable arising from rental of units, all appliances and personal property located at [address], all HVAC equipment, all laundry equipment and revenue therefrom.' Something like that.

0 coins

That's really helpful. The laundry revenue piece is something we hadn't even thought about but it's probably $2000/month.

0 coins

Don't forget security deposits! Those are accounts too and can be significant with 48 units.

0 coins

HVAC systems are usually fixtures attached to real estate though, not personal property for UCC purposes.

0 coins

Wait, I'm confused about the continuation vs amendment issue. If your UCC-1 expires in 3 months, can you file a continuation with the new collateral description or do you need to file an amendment first?

0 coins

You'd file a UCC-3 amendment to change the collateral description, then file the UCC-3 continuation to extend the time. Two separate filings.

0 coins

That's what I was afraid of. More filing fees and more complexity.

0 coins

Actually I think you can do both on the same UCC-3 form in most states. Check your state's specific form.

0 coins

The real issue here is that multifamily properties blur the line between real estate and personal property. Rental income is definitely personal property (accounts), but things like built-in appliances might be fixtures that are part of the real estate. Your lender wants a UCC-1 because they can't get a real estate mortgage on personal property, but they also want to make sure they're not missing anything that should be covered by the mortgage instead.

0 coins

So how do you decide what goes in the UCC-1 vs what's covered by the mortgage?

0 coins

Generally, if it's attached to the building permanently, it's a fixture covered by the mortgage. If it's removable or generates income separately, it goes in the UCC-1.

0 coins

This is getting complicated. Maybe just list everything and let the lawyers sort it out later?

0 coins

I work with multifamily lenders all the time and they're definitely getting more picky about collateral descriptions lately. Part of it is regulatory pressure, part of it is they've seen too many deals where the security interest wasn't properly perfected because the UCC-1 didn't match the security agreement.

0 coins

What happens if they don't match exactly?

0 coins

Worst case, the lender's security interest isn't perfected and they're unsecured in bankruptcy. That's why they're being so careful now.

0 coins

This is exactly why I always recommend getting a second opinion on UCC filings for deals over $1M.

0 coins

Just went through this with a 52-unit property. Ended up with a 3-page collateral schedule in the security agreement and a much simpler summary in the UCC-1 that referenced the security agreement. Seemed to work fine.

0 coins

Did you have any issues with the UCC-1 referencing an external document?

0 coins

No problems. The UCC allows you to reference other documents as long as the UCC-1 itself gives reasonable notice of the collateral.

0 coins

I've seen some states reject UCC-1s that just reference other documents without any description. Better to include at least a summary.

0 coins

Another thing to watch out for with multifamily properties is making sure your debtor name matches exactly across all the documents. If you have an LLC as the borrower, make sure the UCC-1 has the exact same entity name as the security agreement and the loan docs.

0 coins

Good point. Our LLC name has changed slightly since 2019 due to a state filing correction.

0 coins

That's another thing Certana.ai caught for us - slight differences in entity names across documents. Really saved us from a filing error.

0 coins

Entity name changes can be a nightmare. You might need to file an amendment just to correct the debtor name before dealing with the collateral description.

0 coins

Have you considered whether you need a fixture filing for any of this? If some of the collateral is attached to the real estate, you might need to file the UCC-1 as a fixture filing with the real estate records instead of just the regular UCC filing office.

0 coins

I hadn't thought about that. How do you know if you need a fixture filing?

0 coins

Generally if the collateral is attached to the building and would be considered a fixture under state real estate law. Think built-in appliances, HVAC systems, etc.

0 coins

Fixture filings are a whole different animal. Different forms, different filing office, different rules. Definitely talk to your attorney about this.

0 coins

UPDATE: Ended up using a document review service to make sure everything aligned properly before filing. Found several inconsistencies between our security agreement and proposed UCC-1 that could have caused problems. Filed the UCC-3 amendment and continuation together and the lender accepted it. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Glad it worked out! Which document review service did you use?

0 coins

Used Certana.ai's document checker. Just uploaded our security agreement and UCC drafts and it flagged all the mismatches. Made the whole process much smoother.

0 coins

Great to hear a success story. Multifamily UCC filings can be really tricky but sounds like you got it sorted out.

0 coins

This is a great example of why proper document coordination is so critical in multifamily financing. I've seen deals fall apart at the last minute because of UCC filing issues. One thing I'd add for anyone reading this - when you're dealing with a property that has both residential and commercial components (like ground floor retail in a multifamily building), make sure your collateral description addresses both income streams separately. The rental income from residential units might be treated differently than commercial lease payments for UCC purposes. Also, if you have any equipment leases (like the laundry machines), those lease agreements themselves can be collateral separate from the equipment and revenue. Worth double-checking that your security agreement covers all the different types of personal property and income streams you actually have.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today